Sarah Cassie Burnett
Department of Program in Computing
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
21.7%
18.1%
14.5%
10.9%
7.2%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

40.0%
33.3%
26.7%
20.0%
13.3%
6.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 12, 2023

Only take this class with her if you have previous coding experiences. Pic 10A is supposed to be an introductory course into c++ coding. However, prof Burnett's way of teaching kind of made it hard for beginners. I've coded in java before I learned c++ with her so I knew about the basic concepts in coding and that definitely made this class a lot easier. This class mainly consisted of weekly hw and one midterm and one final. You have to name the hw the exact way she tells you to otherwise you get a 0 cuz I think they check your hw by directly inputting your file into their test case window with a set template. Midterm and final were fair. I had Nori as my TA and he was so blessed! Def be in his section if you are planning on taking this class. It helps a lot!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 8, 2023

I did not like this class. Lectures were hard to follow along with and there was little explanation given for many concepts. My friend who I took this course with and I had no programming experience in HS, so we found it quite challenging to keep up considering Burnett didn't really *explain* any of the fundamentals. She would just kind of run through code and it was up to us to figure it out.
The homework wasn't too bad in terms of task difficulty, but something that was agitating is that she would give a 0 if the file was misnamed (ie HW_1 instead of HW-1) or had a single build error in the code. I think she would also give a 0 for runtime errors, but I can't remember for sure. Also, my TA was not very helpful but I started going to the other section ~halfway through the quarter and it was a little better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
Dec. 12, 2023

Only take this class with her if you have previous coding experiences. Pic 10A is supposed to be an introductory course into c++ coding. However, prof Burnett's way of teaching kind of made it hard for beginners. I've coded in java before I learned c++ with her so I knew about the basic concepts in coding and that definitely made this class a lot easier. This class mainly consisted of weekly hw and one midterm and one final. You have to name the hw the exact way she tells you to otherwise you get a 0 cuz I think they check your hw by directly inputting your file into their test case window with a set template. Midterm and final were fair. I had Nori as my TA and he was so blessed! Def be in his section if you are planning on taking this class. It helps a lot!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
Dec. 8, 2023

I did not like this class. Lectures were hard to follow along with and there was little explanation given for many concepts. My friend who I took this course with and I had no programming experience in HS, so we found it quite challenging to keep up considering Burnett didn't really *explain* any of the fundamentals. She would just kind of run through code and it was up to us to figure it out.
The homework wasn't too bad in terms of task difficulty, but something that was agitating is that she would give a 0 if the file was misnamed (ie HW_1 instead of HW-1) or had a single build error in the code. I think she would also give a 0 for runtime errors, but I can't remember for sure. Also, my TA was not very helpful but I started going to the other section ~halfway through the quarter and it was a little better.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!