All Ratings and Reviews for Gregory Schopen

Ratings

Bad
Overall 4.3
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 3.0
Easy
Heavy
Workload 2.9
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 4.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 3.6
Helpful
AD
1 of 2

Reviews

S ASIAN 60, taken Fall 2017 Submitted Jan. 10, 2018 Grade Received: A

Professor Schopen is my favorite professor I've had thus far. He's engaging and it really shows that he does his part to make the class as good as possible. He keeps an open-ended view and gives a broad understanding of the topic. Homework is simple, to the point, and easy to score well on. Midterm and Final are identical- 3 essay questions in class. Essays are fairly straightforward and open book. Extremely glad I took this class- would absolutely look to take something with Schopen again.

Course not listed Submitted April 9, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

You don't really learn much about Buddhism except the theoretical debates about HOW to learn Buddhism. But the professor is a funny and nice person.

Course not listed Submitted April 3, 2001 Grade Received: N/A

I took Schopen for EALC60W. Prof. Schopen's style of teaching was refreshing although I felt a lot of the essay assignments were very difficult. He tells his TAs to be harsh on your first papers so don't go in expecting anything fantastic. Still, if you stick with the course you do learn a lot about Buddhism and your writing will improve. If you like philosophy/history this isn't a bad Humanities course to take.

Course not listed Submitted Jan. 22, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

Man...what a waste of time...we were writing about the study of the study of religions...too many degrees removed from reality.

Course not listed Submitted June 12, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

I just sat in Professor Schopen's class "intro to Buddhism" and was very pleased with both the way he lectures and the insights he is trying to convey.
The Professor primarily does not primarily focus on delivering informations that one could easily obtain from the course-reader (doing the readings is a MUST anyway), but on building up critical thinking regarding "Buddhism" or any other field of academical research.

Course not listed Submitted May 23, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

This guy really, really rambles in lecture. Most of the time it doesn't seem like he's taking you in any direction. Maybe this extemporaneous speaking style works for some classes, but not really for a religous studies class. He assigns a lot of reading and then really doesn't cover it very well.

Course not listed Submitted Aug. 29, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

He doesn't follow any discernable lecture format, is ill-prepared, and doesn't seem to care about students learning the material. What is more, he doesn't even pass out a syllabus, choosing rather to asign reading as he goes. Yes, he is one of the world's foremost experts on Buddhism, but that doesn't come through in his courses. He spends most of his lectures either talking about obscure details that he hasn't provided any background for, or bashing Abrahamic religions. If you're looking for a GE or a religious studies class, take something else.

Course not listed Submitted March 11, 2003 Grade Received: N/A

wow, what an awesome class!!! i really enjoyed the way there was a symbolic and philosophical side to all of the concepts and practices introduced in the class. professor schopen is awesome, and made the class very entertaining. the grading was based on weekly summaries of the class material, just one page papers, really informal, and the final, which is an in-class essay that we got the topics for a week in advance to prepare. professor schopen seemed more concerned with whether or not we learned the material, enjoyed the class, and developed an interest in the subject than he was with making it seem challenging by giving us random exams like some professors do. he is a greast guy, has an awesome sense of humor, and i enjoyed the professor and the class. take it if you can.

Course not listed Submitted Jan. 23, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

i didn't really feel that my writing improved....it's like the class had two totally separate purposes and they didn't compliment each other at all.

Course not listed Submitted June 20, 2004 Grade Received: N/A

I read Schopen's reviews today after finishing a class with him. I was astonished. He seems to get a really bad rap from the other raters here, but I loved "Intro to Buddhism". I took it both as a G.E. and because I was fascinated by Buddhism. From his dry sense of humor, to his brilliantly colored animal, flower, or holiday-themed ties, to his golden sunflower belt buckle, Schopen is a trip that everyone should go on while at UCLA. The man writes on the chalkboard in a shwooping-style-font that I've never seen before. He made up a font for chrissake! Talking to him outside of class is like doing drugs with your best friends, and you'll walk away feeling enlightened. Please take this class, even if you are jut sitting in on it. It'll be well worth your while.

1 of 2
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!