All Ratings and Reviews for Mark S Goorsky

Ratings

Bad
Overall 4.6
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 2.1
Easy
Heavy
Workload 1.8
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 4.6
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 4.6
Helpful
AD
1 of 2

Reviews

MAT SCI 122, taken Winter 2019 Submitted June 26, 2019 Grade Received: A-

I feel like this class is a bit overrated in the MSE department, but it is still a very solid elective. The midterm is similar to previous years, so just make a few MSE upperclassmen friends and it should be a cakewalk.

Finals weeks was extremely stressful though splitting time between a long term paper, a surprise take home final, and the actual final. I ended up not studying for the final because I was so burned out from doing the take home and term paper alongside my other classes. Goorsky is one of the better MSE professors, but I think that even he can get really boring and monotonous. Taking EE2 or MSE120 before this class makes the subjects pretty redundant even though they provide the actual fundamentals behind the concepts in MSE 122. I only recommend this class because the other MSE electives are much worse (other than MSE 111).

Course not listed Submitted Jan. 11, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

Great Professor, interactive and made class enjoyable!

Course not listed Submitted March 10, 2001 Grade Received: N/A

Awseome...take as many classes as you can with this guy..it is easy to learn difficult materials from this guy and he's so not boring.

MAT SCI 104 Submitted Aug. 23, 2011 Grade Received: N/A

Excellent lecturer. Enough said.

MAT SCI 110 Submitted Feb. 4, 2015 Grade Received: N/A

He is really good, I've had so many crappy classes but goorsky really inspired me and mse is awesome! He explains concepts very well and taught us the potential of x rays!

MAT SCI 104 Submitted Sept. 3, 2013 Grade Received: N/A

Honestly, he has been the best lecturer I've had so far at UCLA. He made my first Materials Engineering course very fun and interesting. He is very knowledgeable about the material and would often make great analogies to help us grasp different concepts.

If you are a 1st year Materials Engineer I would recommend taking MSE 104 with Goorsky over summer. The class size is really small, he is helpful, curves well, and you gain a solid foundation with the subject. I ended up with an A.

MAT SCI 104, taken Summer 2015 Submitted May 20, 2016 Grade Received: A

YOU SHOULD TAKE THIS CLASS WITH GOORSKY. All I have to say is that it is a huge missed opportunity if you take 104 with any other professor. This was the best MSE class I ever took besides his 110 class. HIGHEST RECOMMENDATION

MAT SCI 110L, taken Fall 2014 Submitted June 2, 2016 Grade Received: A+

Take this class with MSE 110....it definitely helps!!!

Course not listed Submitted March 13, 2002 Grade Received: N/A

Best professor in the department! Does a good job of breaking down difficult topics into something very understandable without sacrificing detail.

MAT SCI 104, taken Summer 2017 Submitted Aug. 18, 2017 Grade Received: A

Goorsky is fucking awesome. He's one of the few teachers to have been recognized as a distinguished teacher and he won the award last year in 2016. Also he let us play with liquid nitrogen after we made ice cream, try finding a teacher that does that.

MSE 104 is an introductory class where you will cover crystallography, mechanical properties, mechanical failure, processing materials, phase diagrams, ceramics, polymers, solid state in the realm of electrical and optical properties, and a little bit of composites and nanotech.

It's a lot of info, but it serves to introduce you to the topics and some key concepts for going forward. He uses an introductory book and complementary slides that come with it, but 80% of the time the slides throw useless formulas that Goorsky doesn't care about, so you'll see him skipping through a lot of the slides (he uploads them online so don't freak out).

On the surface, he can seem incredibly boring because he might appear as though he's reading slides to you and he fumbles around with using powerpoint. So when we got to phase diagrams and the information got a little muddled, lots of people weren't paying attention and those days were kinda dull in class, he even called out students in the back for not paying attention. However, if you want to see the true power of this man, you need to start asking him questions. He knows his shit SO well that he will always give you a satisfying answer to a question, and he always considers it. He'll tell you stories that relate to it and in general when he starts rambling things get very interesting.

I imagine you're taking this class because A) you're a mechanical engineer or B) you're materials engineer/chemistry materials . It really pissed me off to see the Mech E's sleeping in the back of the class not really paying attention nor giving him the respect he deserves. Goorsky is truly fantastic.

He's a bit scary in the start just because he'll ask super obtuse questions, but that's his style which is very different than some other teachers I've had. He'll be the one asking you the questions so you can draw the answer out on your own, which works surprisingly well.

My absolute favorite part of the class are discussion sections (or recitations as he calls it). Here, Goorsky, or the TA will do demonstrations for you. These demonstrations included making ice cream with liquid nitrogen, breaking glass, looking over 3D models for crystal structures etc. People wouldn't go, which is disappointing since they were pretty fun, but more importantly, he had a question on the final that asked about the demos done in discussion, so make sure to attend and pay attention.

My biggest problem with the class though was the pacing, but I think that's just dependent on what year you're taking it. The first week he had a conference so we had one lecture that week, and then he had another big event, so he uploaded online lectures for us to watch, and towards the end when we got to smaller topics he started ending lectures early. It was really awkward and all that dead time could have condensed the class into 6 weeks.

The most work you'll need to do is the homework problem sets, and those only cover computational elements of the test, plus a bit of conceptual stuff you should know.

Basically to succeed, just make sure to engage in the class and pay attention to what he says and pay attention the demos. The tests at the test bank are incredibly similar to the ones he gives you, if not recycled, and in general are pretty easy. His first quiz he made 1/3 of it a group quiz where we worked together to identify crystal structures. The 2nd quiz had a couple application based questions. He curves up, not down, the TA was super nice (at least in the summer I did it).

Sit down, pay attention and have fun. I very much look forward to MSE 110 with him.

1 of 2
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!