Professor

Todd Yeates

AD
4.3
Overall Ratings
Based on 25 Users
Easiness 1.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (25)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
March 5, 2015
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

If you are reading this, you are probably a biochem major who has been through a wide range of science classes, and maybe some general education classes and a number of writing classes if you are premed and will probably continue facing several other classes before graduation. chem 156 with yeates is one of the better taught courses. doesnt saturate you with material like mimg101, or 153c. The only better class was 110a with baugh but baugh is going to be gone for a year. yeates lectures, while mostly involve chalk board, are easy to note down and follow (Compared to writing classes where they just lecture on and on with little to no chance to catch up). It might be a challenging class, but its less work than some awful classes out there (again Im looking at you mmimg101 and hardline writing ta's)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 18, 2018
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: A-

If you are taking this class with Professor Yeates and hated CHEM 110A like I did, rest easy. This class is nowhere near as bad as CHEM 110A and it is actually fairly interesting.

Class breakdown: - Midterm 1: 100 points
- Midterm 2: 100 points
- Midterm 3/Final: 130 points
- HW (he never told us how much HW was actually worth)

Professor Yeates is a good professor. He doesn't overload you with material and presents it in a clear and concise way although most of the lectures will be almost completely from the book. Another great thing about this class was the fact that you don't have to shell out for an expensive textbook. Professor Yeates sold us his textbook on the kindle store for like $2.

The exams for this class are all pretty fair. Midterm 1 average was a 70 and Midterm 2 average was 85 (I think the second midterm was a bit too easy). Homework in this class is fairly tricky because all of them are old exam questions but there's no penalty for giving the wrong answer because all of the homework is graded for completion but the TA will take off points if it looks like you are writing random things.

CHEM 156 is one of those rare classes where the final isn't fully cumulative which was really nice. Despite it being not cumulative it was definitely more difficult than the midterms.

Overall this class was a good experience. Definitely take 156 with Yeates if you can

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 18, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A

I took this class during Spring 2020 when it was completely offered online because of COVID-19. During this quarter, Professor Yeates pre-recorded the lectures, and the only live components were the discussion sections. I found the lectures fairly helpful, though they were essentially a verbal version of the textbook (so it might help to read the textbook if you're having trouble with a concept). Discussions were helpful as the TAs went over homework problems and we were put into breakout rooms to discuss those problems.
For this quarter, Professor Yeates decided to get rid of all exams (including the final) which made the class a lot more stress-free. Our grade was based purely on weekly assignments which were due once a week, and graded on a check minus/check/check plus basis. As such, I found the class pretty straightforward. The concepts were alright; honestly I was super passionate about them as they were kind of all over the place - one week we'd learn about protein symmetry, another week we'd learn about kinetics. It seemed like just a bunch of random biochemical topics thrown into one class.
My only gripe with this class was the Python coding assignments that were on the homework. Professor Yeates assigned us coding assignments, but for someone like me with no coding experience, I didn't really understand what was going on at all. I pretty much relied on the TA to carry me through that portion of the course, but even then - I had no idea what was really going on. It would have been helpful to get more basic Python info/tutorials for people with no coding experience though.

Overall, though, this is a decent class (especially if it's being taught online) - I would recommend Yeates to the prospective chem 156 student!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 24, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A

Yeates made this class incredibly easy during the COVID-19 pandemic. All you had to do to get an A was attend discussion and do the homework assignment every week. You get most of the homework answers during your discussion section and if not, the TAs give you homework answers during office hours. This was a good and bad thing; good because it was low stress, bad because it meant you really didn't have to learn anything. I stopped keeping up with this class after week 3 when things started to pick up the pace in my other classes (AHEM Nakamoto's CHEM 154) and never caught back up to speed. So yes, I got an A in this class for putting in the work, but I barely touched the textbook, didn't watch the lectures, and put in the minimum amount of time on the homework assignments which means I didn't learn much. I know that this will hurt me down the line so I might go back and learn everything now that I've graduated and have time haha

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 5, 2015

If you are reading this, you are probably a biochem major who has been through a wide range of science classes, and maybe some general education classes and a number of writing classes if you are premed and will probably continue facing several other classes before graduation. chem 156 with yeates is one of the better taught courses. doesnt saturate you with material like mimg101, or 153c. The only better class was 110a with baugh but baugh is going to be gone for a year. yeates lectures, while mostly involve chalk board, are easy to note down and follow (Compared to writing classes where they just lecture on and on with little to no chance to catch up). It might be a challenging class, but its less work than some awful classes out there (again Im looking at you mmimg101 and hardline writing ta's)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: A-
Dec. 18, 2018

If you are taking this class with Professor Yeates and hated CHEM 110A like I did, rest easy. This class is nowhere near as bad as CHEM 110A and it is actually fairly interesting.

Class breakdown: - Midterm 1: 100 points
- Midterm 2: 100 points
- Midterm 3/Final: 130 points
- HW (he never told us how much HW was actually worth)

Professor Yeates is a good professor. He doesn't overload you with material and presents it in a clear and concise way although most of the lectures will be almost completely from the book. Another great thing about this class was the fact that you don't have to shell out for an expensive textbook. Professor Yeates sold us his textbook on the kindle store for like $2.

The exams for this class are all pretty fair. Midterm 1 average was a 70 and Midterm 2 average was 85 (I think the second midterm was a bit too easy). Homework in this class is fairly tricky because all of them are old exam questions but there's no penalty for giving the wrong answer because all of the homework is graded for completion but the TA will take off points if it looks like you are writing random things.

CHEM 156 is one of those rare classes where the final isn't fully cumulative which was really nice. Despite it being not cumulative it was definitely more difficult than the midterms.

Overall this class was a good experience. Definitely take 156 with Yeates if you can

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
June 18, 2020

I took this class during Spring 2020 when it was completely offered online because of COVID-19. During this quarter, Professor Yeates pre-recorded the lectures, and the only live components were the discussion sections. I found the lectures fairly helpful, though they were essentially a verbal version of the textbook (so it might help to read the textbook if you're having trouble with a concept). Discussions were helpful as the TAs went over homework problems and we were put into breakout rooms to discuss those problems.
For this quarter, Professor Yeates decided to get rid of all exams (including the final) which made the class a lot more stress-free. Our grade was based purely on weekly assignments which were due once a week, and graded on a check minus/check/check plus basis. As such, I found the class pretty straightforward. The concepts were alright; honestly I was super passionate about them as they were kind of all over the place - one week we'd learn about protein symmetry, another week we'd learn about kinetics. It seemed like just a bunch of random biochemical topics thrown into one class.
My only gripe with this class was the Python coding assignments that were on the homework. Professor Yeates assigned us coding assignments, but for someone like me with no coding experience, I didn't really understand what was going on at all. I pretty much relied on the TA to carry me through that portion of the course, but even then - I had no idea what was really going on. It would have been helpful to get more basic Python info/tutorials for people with no coding experience though.

Overall, though, this is a decent class (especially if it's being taught online) - I would recommend Yeates to the prospective chem 156 student!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
CHEM 156
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
June 24, 2020

Yeates made this class incredibly easy during the COVID-19 pandemic. All you had to do to get an A was attend discussion and do the homework assignment every week. You get most of the homework answers during your discussion section and if not, the TAs give you homework answers during office hours. This was a good and bad thing; good because it was low stress, bad because it meant you really didn't have to learn anything. I stopped keeping up with this class after week 3 when things started to pick up the pace in my other classes (AHEM Nakamoto's CHEM 154) and never caught back up to speed. So yes, I got an A in this class for putting in the work, but I barely touched the textbook, didn't watch the lectures, and put in the minimum amount of time on the homework assignments which means I didn't learn much. I know that this will hurt me down the line so I might go back and learn everything now that I've graduated and have time haha

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!