CH ENGR 113
Air Pollution Engineering
Description: Lecture, four hours; preparation, two hours; outside study, six hours. Enforced requisites: courses 101C, 102B. Integrated approach to air pollution, including concentrations of atmospheric pollutants, air pollution standards, air pollution sources and control technology, and relationship of air quality to emission sources. Links air pollution to multimedia environmental assessment. Letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
discusses a lot of cool info, but very disorganized, grading doesn't reflect effort in the class. you can do well on all of the assignments, which tend to be useful, but are worth much less points overall than the time they take up, or have a good business plan, which is also a tiny fraction of your grade but takes up so much time and is the point of the class. your grade literally comes down to the exams, whether or not the TAs like you, and how much you participate. this is BS. your grade in entrepreneurship should be based on your ability to present an effective plan and generate good ideas, not on some arbitrary theory. oh and also, his tests and what he teaches in class have no connection. lets be real, no one actually reads the book, which is expensive as hell. yes, he has a review session where he tells you what's on the test, but most of the time, the questions people get wrong NOT because of difficulty, but because of how ambiguous they are worded. also bristow is super antiquated in his thinking and ideas. very stubborn,gives all the work to his TAs. don't take this class thinking its an easy A, its really not worth it. take the other professor or do management 180. engr 112 i took, disregard the title
discusses a lot of cool info, but very disorganized, grading doesn't reflect effort in the class. you can do well on all of the assignments, which tend to be useful, but are worth much less points overall than the time they take up, or have a good business plan, which is also a tiny fraction of your grade but takes up so much time and is the point of the class. your grade literally comes down to the exams, whether or not the TAs like you, and how much you participate. this is BS. your grade in entrepreneurship should be based on your ability to present an effective plan and generate good ideas, not on some arbitrary theory. oh and also, his tests and what he teaches in class have no connection. lets be real, no one actually reads the book, which is expensive as hell. yes, he has a review session where he tells you what's on the test, but most of the time, the questions people get wrong NOT because of difficulty, but because of how ambiguous they are worded. also bristow is super antiquated in his thinking and ideas. very stubborn,gives all the work to his TAs. don't take this class thinking its an easy A, its really not worth it. take the other professor or do management 180. engr 112 i took, disregard the title
1 of 1
