ENGL 166
20th-Century British Fiction
Description:
Units:
Units:
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
The people here trashing Professor Colacurcio are the sort of people who don't actually give two hells about English, and are "simpletons" themselves with no idea of the texture or measure of real learning. Yes, Professor Colacurcio is old, a little scatter-brained, but to call him a bad professor -- you don't deserve to go a school like UCLA saying such a thing, frankly. If you don't want to learn, rot your brain elsewhere. Colacurcio is not the professor for you -- and indeed, UCLA is not the SCHOOL for you. Professor Colacurcio is difficult professor if 1. you want easy classes and no reading (why you're an English major at all then -- you may want to reconsider); 2. you aren't interested in history; 3. you want a snappy, hip-with-the-times lecturer who speaks the kids' lingo, yo. When I go to Professor Colacurcio's office hours I don't understand half his remarks, but that's the beauty of it. He knows so much I DON'T know. I don't understand so I ASK, and I LEARN. That's what we're here for, taking upper division classes. Easy GE, fine, but this is the major you're making a living out of, right? If you CARE about English, about this degree you're paying for, distinguished professors like Colacurcio are a blessing. We are very fortunate to have him. Fly-by-night English majors beware him; lovers of language, of history, or literature, rejoice.
The people here trashing Professor Colacurcio are the sort of people who don't actually give two hells about English, and are "simpletons" themselves with no idea of the texture or measure of real learning. Yes, Professor Colacurcio is old, a little scatter-brained, but to call him a bad professor -- you don't deserve to go a school like UCLA saying such a thing, frankly. If you don't want to learn, rot your brain elsewhere. Colacurcio is not the professor for you -- and indeed, UCLA is not the SCHOOL for you. Professor Colacurcio is difficult professor if 1. you want easy classes and no reading (why you're an English major at all then -- you may want to reconsider); 2. you aren't interested in history; 3. you want a snappy, hip-with-the-times lecturer who speaks the kids' lingo, yo. When I go to Professor Colacurcio's office hours I don't understand half his remarks, but that's the beauty of it. He knows so much I DON'T know. I don't understand so I ASK, and I LEARN. That's what we're here for, taking upper division classes. Easy GE, fine, but this is the major you're making a living out of, right? If you CARE about English, about this degree you're paying for, distinguished professors like Colacurcio are a blessing. We are very fortunate to have him. Fly-by-night English majors beware him; lovers of language, of history, or literature, rejoice.
AD
Most Helpful Review
After taking Professor Kolb, I can say that there are a lot of advantages and disadvantages to his teaching style and the way in which his course was run. He had a lot of health problems, so several classes were cancelled, sometimes without notice. Although it was a nice surprise to show up to the door and suddenly have a free 2 hours, some might view this as a liability. The department eventually enlisted another teacher, Professor Beesmeyer to help him teach the course. After learning from both Professor Kolb and Beesemeyer, I can honestly say that Kolb is one of the more brilliant professors that I have ever had at UCLA. Rather than giving us a traditional read of the texts, he really dug deep and found a lot of insightful and original things to say about the texts that he was actually able to substantiate with evidence (unlike some professors, who throw out a lot of baseless theories that make no sense). The downside to this is that often lecture consisted of him simply talking for two hours straight (which he is able to do, and do well) without following any kind of clear structure. Despite his brilliant capacity to lecture, I found that none of it helped whatsoever on the midterm, which was just a simple exam in which we answered factual questions about the texts without having to explicate them in any way. The midterm was incredibly easy, as we only needed to answer 20 out of 42 (!) questions. The final consisted of a 4-page take home paper (the prompts were quite difficult) and explicating 5 out of 18 quotations in class. We also had a paper to do, but it was cancelled because of his absences. Overall, I disagree with many raters saying that he is the best professor at UCLA, but Kolb is definitely worth taking - his class is straightforward, not stressful, and he's a charming and witty guy.
After taking Professor Kolb, I can say that there are a lot of advantages and disadvantages to his teaching style and the way in which his course was run. He had a lot of health problems, so several classes were cancelled, sometimes without notice. Although it was a nice surprise to show up to the door and suddenly have a free 2 hours, some might view this as a liability. The department eventually enlisted another teacher, Professor Beesmeyer to help him teach the course. After learning from both Professor Kolb and Beesemeyer, I can honestly say that Kolb is one of the more brilliant professors that I have ever had at UCLA. Rather than giving us a traditional read of the texts, he really dug deep and found a lot of insightful and original things to say about the texts that he was actually able to substantiate with evidence (unlike some professors, who throw out a lot of baseless theories that make no sense). The downside to this is that often lecture consisted of him simply talking for two hours straight (which he is able to do, and do well) without following any kind of clear structure. Despite his brilliant capacity to lecture, I found that none of it helped whatsoever on the midterm, which was just a simple exam in which we answered factual questions about the texts without having to explicate them in any way. The midterm was incredibly easy, as we only needed to answer 20 out of 42 (!) questions. The final consisted of a 4-page take home paper (the prompts were quite difficult) and explicating 5 out of 18 quotations in class. We also had a paper to do, but it was cancelled because of his absences. Overall, I disagree with many raters saying that he is the best professor at UCLA, but Kolb is definitely worth taking - his class is straightforward, not stressful, and he's a charming and witty guy.
Most Helpful Review
Professor Looby was once of my favorite Professors at UCLA. He is such a great guy. He is very interesting and engaged with the material that he teaches. I learned so much from his lectures. He is very very very well-spoken (seriously, I loved that) and I always found myself considering new ideas that I never would have otherwise having not taken several of his courses. Oh, and he picks great literature to read! My only regret is that I never went to office hours and got to know such a cool dude. Thanks Professor.
Professor Looby was once of my favorite Professors at UCLA. He is such a great guy. He is very interesting and engaged with the material that he teaches. I learned so much from his lectures. He is very very very well-spoken (seriously, I loved that) and I always found myself considering new ideas that I never would have otherwise having not taken several of his courses. Oh, and he picks great literature to read! My only regret is that I never went to office hours and got to know such a cool dude. Thanks Professor.
1 of 1
