ENGL 182A

Specialized Studies in Colonial American Literature

1 of 2
Professor Most Helpful Review
1 of 2

PROFESSORS

Blake Allmendinger See Full Profile

Overall 2.5 Easiness 2.5 Workload 2.2 Clarity 2.5 Helpfulness 2.5

Most Helpful Review

I don't know what everyone is talking about. Sounds like some bitter students to me. I thought Blake was awesome. He cared about the subject, the class, and his students. Class was always fun, discussion was interesting, and I really feel like I walked away with some awesome knowledge. If I had any more terms left at UCLA I would totally take more classes with him. One of the best teachers the school has to offer. I'll always remember our class!

June 7, 2012
S Burrows Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
S Burrows See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
AD
AD
Michael Colacurcio Full Profile > 3.5 Overall 1.8 Easiness 1.7 Workload 3.3 Clarity 3.8 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Michael Colacurcio See Full Profile

Overall 3.5 Easiness 1.8 Workload 1.7 Clarity 3.3 Helpfulness 3.8

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Stephen Dickey See Full Profile

Overall 3.5 Easiness 2.2 Workload 2.5 Clarity 4.2 Helpfulness 4.2

Most Helpful Review

Took a seminar on the Beat generation with Professor Dickey. He is a lively, passionate, and enthusiastic speaker, and class was always entertaining. Grade consists of one-page responses to the readings each week, a student-led class discussion based on a reading/theme of your choice, and a final paper. Class was very structured for a seminar and I thoroughly enjoyed this class. Final grade was a B, but the experience was definitely worthwhile. Definitely take him! Looking forward to taking him for Shakespeare B next quarter.

March 10, 2011
Joseph Dimuro Full Profile > 3.8 Overall 1.2 Easiness 1.5 Workload 3.8 Clarity 3.5 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Joseph Dimuro See Full Profile

Overall 3.8 Easiness 1.2 Workload 1.5 Clarity 3.8 Helpfulness 3.5

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
Lawrence Grobel Full Profile > 3.8 Overall 1.5 Easiness 1.8 Workload 3.5 Clarity 4.0 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Lawrence Grobel See Full Profile

Overall 3.8 Easiness 1.5 Workload 1.8 Clarity 3.5 Helpfulness 4.0

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
AD
AD
Mitchum Huehls See Full Profile

Overall 4.8 Easiness 1.6 Workload 1.6 Clarity 4.4 Helpfulness 3.2

Most Helpful Review

While I've heard decent things about him for 173C, perhaps the seminar setting of 182C is not where his teaching style belongs. That said, I took the 182C seminar on Human Rights Literature, and his conduct of the class was perhaps further skewed by the fact that he was teaching a class he was doing his own research on. As a result, I felt that instead of allowing ample opportunity for the class to make its own discoveries, to cultivate its own interests in the material, he steamrolled us. He definitely had a direction he wanted to steer the class in, and went to great lengths to make sure we spent 3 hours working towards his personal point. To his credit, he did have moments of clarity throughout the quarter in which he made efforts to be more inclusive of what issues we were interested in addressing, but those efforts were short-lived. Throughout the quarter, I couldn't shake the feeling that Huehls is still one of those intellects with some sort of chip on his shoulder, constantly having to prove how smart he is.

Overall, though, the class wasn't bad--the material was interesting, the workload a bit heavy (especially if taking other literature courses at the same time). A novel a week in addition to secondary texts, one-page response papers (which he--oddly, IMO--let people turn in up until week 9), all culminating in a final presentation and research paper. It's a bit of work, but as long as you put in a decent amount of effort in and outside of class, you should fare well.

Dec. 27, 2008
Robert Maniquis See Full Profile

Overall 3.8 Easiness 1.8 Workload 1.8 Clarity 3.5 Helpfulness 2.8

Most Helpful Review

An excerpt on this professor form UCLA's English department website:

"Along the way, Professor Maniquis has been a shoe-shine boy, a gang member, a boy scout, a dishwasher, a golf caddie, a bowling alley pinboy, a grave digger, a coffin polisher, a hamburger slinger, an automobile worker, a plumber's assistant a human subject in band-aid experiments, a lab assistant charged with brushing hamster's teeth, an organist in a Baptist church, a truck driver, a foreman on an Oregon blackberry farm, an assistant to a private detective, a dialogue coach for several films, a script doctor, a private tutor to the fabulously rich, a translator, and the producer of orchestral music for a silent film."

Unsurprisingly, Professor Maniquis is a mysterious man who makes his free-floating lectures consistently fascinating. The richness of his experience certainly colors the method of his teaching, which can be described as stern but highly constructive. He constantly challenges you intellectually, drawing not just from personal experience but from the absolute breadth of history and culture he has read and watched in his lifetime. I cannot even imagine how vast the extent of his knowledge is. I echo the sentiment of other reviewers, that he is an "old school" professor. If you are like me, and believe the study of literature has been bogged down by increasingly esoteric and politically-charged theoretical approaches, then being "old school," being traditional, is a virtue. Overall, he will deepen your appreciation for literature and increase your curiosity for life and for thought, and I highly recommend his classes.

June 4, 2015
Christopher Mott See Full Profile

Overall 3.3 Easiness 1.5 Workload 1.5 Clarity 3.7 Helpfulness 3.8

Most Helpful Review

Great professor. Very approachable and friendly. I know that Mott isn't everyone's cup of tea but I got along with him very well, which made it easy to ask for help when writing my paper. If you're interested in a great seminar, please take English 183C.

March 31, 2012
Sianne Ngai Full Profile > 4.2 Overall 2.8 Easiness 2.2 Workload 4.2 Clarity 4.5 Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Sianne Ngai See Full Profile

Overall 4.2 Easiness 2.8 Workload 2.2 Clarity 4.2 Helpfulness 4.5

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
AD
AD
1 of 2

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!