MATH 32A
Calculus of Several Variables
Description: Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Enforced requisite: course 31A with grade of C- or better. Introduction to differential calculus of several variables, vector field theory. P/NP or letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
8 of 12
Most Helpful Review
1st midterm was very easy, 2nd was harder but fair (everyone thought it was going to be easy). the final was difficult. micheli posts the answers to all tests and homeworks. he is prompt about posting stuff, although i have to warn you that his homeworks tend to be a little long. micheli cares a lot about his students (he responds very quickly! i emailed him around 11 pm once, and he replied about 5 min. later!) he's very approachable and hilarious! I would definitely recommend him! (i took his class again the following quarter even if I didn't do so well!).
1st midterm was very easy, 2nd was harder but fair (everyone thought it was going to be easy). the final was difficult. micheli posts the answers to all tests and homeworks. he is prompt about posting stuff, although i have to warn you that his homeworks tend to be a little long. micheli cares a lot about his students (he responds very quickly! i emailed him around 11 pm once, and he replied about 5 min. later!) he's very approachable and hilarious! I would definitely recommend him! (i took his class again the following quarter even if I didn't do so well!).
AD
Most Helpful Review
He is kind of hard to understand and his writing is messy too. He's good if you understand what he is saying, but I didn't. For his tests, most of the questions aren't too hard, but he gives you many many problems so most people run out of time. If you are the kind of person who does math very fast, then take him, but if you aren't really fast then don't.
He is kind of hard to understand and his writing is messy too. He's good if you understand what he is saying, but I didn't. For his tests, most of the questions aren't too hard, but he gives you many many problems so most people run out of time. If you are the kind of person who does math very fast, then take him, but if you aren't really fast then don't.
Most Helpful Review
Fall 2017 - This review is for MATH 32A. Mou is not an interesting professor. He does not use slides are animations, preferring instead to draw out diagrams and writing on the board. This means class goes slowly, but at least if you zone out, you can just check the board for anything you missed. His tests are disproportionately dependant on proofs, and I can almost guarantee his delta-epsilon proofs will get you a poor grade on the test. However, he tries to be helpful and spends the week before the final just covering topics that students have trouble with. Overall an OK professor. Edit (6/7/2018): MATH 32A has been added as a course taught by Professor Mou. I have edited this review to be on the correct course (formerly was on MATH 170).
Fall 2017 - This review is for MATH 32A. Mou is not an interesting professor. He does not use slides are animations, preferring instead to draw out diagrams and writing on the board. This means class goes slowly, but at least if you zone out, you can just check the board for anything you missed. His tests are disproportionately dependant on proofs, and I can almost guarantee his delta-epsilon proofs will get you a poor grade on the test. However, he tries to be helpful and spends the week before the final just covering topics that students have trouble with. Overall an OK professor. Edit (6/7/2018): MATH 32A has been added as a course taught by Professor Mou. I have edited this review to be on the correct course (formerly was on MATH 170).
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2021 - Homework isn't overwhelming, and two of them are dropped at the end of the quarter. Prof. Nam gives short lectures that typically have a couple of example problems to help explain his points. The tests weren't that bad since we had 24 hours to complete them, but he wasn't very lenient on giving partial credit. Great personality and always had a positive attitude. Edit: his final was very very difficult. Made no sense.
Winter 2021 - Homework isn't overwhelming, and two of them are dropped at the end of the quarter. Prof. Nam gives short lectures that typically have a couple of example problems to help explain his points. The tests weren't that bad since we had 24 hours to complete them, but he wasn't very lenient on giving partial credit. Great personality and always had a positive attitude. Edit: his final was very very difficult. Made no sense.
AD
Most Helpful Review
Park is a really good professor. I had him for two quarters and I'd definitely recommend you take him. His class is pretty straightforward, as long as you study the practice midterms. If you don't do well, he's very helpful in office hours too. He definitely wants his students to do well, and he'll do a lot to make sure you get the grade you deserve.
Park is a really good professor. I had him for two quarters and I'd definitely recommend you take him. His class is pretty straightforward, as long as you study the practice midterms. If you don't do well, he's very helpful in office hours too. He definitely wants his students to do well, and he'll do a lot to make sure you get the grade you deserve.
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2016 - Professor Penneys is a mediocre professor. He teaches exactly out of the textbook which is not effective considering tests use problems that vary significantly with the formatting of the textbook problems. Because his lectures was mostly out of the textbook, his teaching style was mostly one-dimensional. The examples used were textbook examples and because of this, it gave little incentive to show up to lecture. His grading policy made up for this. Having the 20% quizzes,20% midterm 1, 20% midterm 2, 40% final breakdown of our grades or the second option of dropping the lowest midterm was very helpful and needed. His tests were mostly straightforward and doable. Nothing extraordinarily surprising. What I think would make me more successful in his class would be more examples in lecture that I could not find in the textbook. Overall, Penneys is a great person and all I wish out of him as an instructor is to put more effort in ensuring students' understanding of the material instead of just writing stuff down I can look up in a textbook.
Winter 2016 - Professor Penneys is a mediocre professor. He teaches exactly out of the textbook which is not effective considering tests use problems that vary significantly with the formatting of the textbook problems. Because his lectures was mostly out of the textbook, his teaching style was mostly one-dimensional. The examples used were textbook examples and because of this, it gave little incentive to show up to lecture. His grading policy made up for this. Having the 20% quizzes,20% midterm 1, 20% midterm 2, 40% final breakdown of our grades or the second option of dropping the lowest midterm was very helpful and needed. His tests were mostly straightforward and doable. Nothing extraordinarily surprising. What I think would make me more successful in his class would be more examples in lecture that I could not find in the textbook. Overall, Penneys is a great person and all I wish out of him as an instructor is to put more effort in ensuring students' understanding of the material instead of just writing stuff down I can look up in a textbook.
AD
8 of 12
