PHILOS 21

Skepticism and Rationality

1 of 1
Professor Most Helpful Review
1 of 1

PROFESSORS

Andrew Hsu See Full Profile

Overall 3.1 Easiness 2.2 Workload 3.0 Clarity 2.8 Helpfulness 3.2

Most Helpful Review

SO BORING. Goes on extreme tangents. Can't be straightforward and answer a question. Thank goodness the material is interesting and my TA was helpful.

Dec. 10, 2011
Sean Kelsey See Full Profile

Overall 3.7 Easiness 1.3 Workload 1.2 Clarity 4.3 Helpfulness 4.8

Most Helpful Review

This class destroyed my soul.

The lectures are very boring. I had to scotch tape my eyeballs open to stop from falling asleep after 20 minutes. The grading is ridiculous. I could go on forever about how this class was a bad experience and made me want to drop out of college, but in short, there are other ways to fill the pre-rec requirement that it fulfills, don't take this class.

Dec. 26, 2005
AD
AD
Hans Lottenbach See Full Profile

Overall 4.0 Easiness 2.0 Workload 1.0 Clarity 4.2 Helpfulness 4.0

Most Helpful Review

As a senior philosophy major, I took 21 for fun (yeah, I'm a bit of a loser) this past quarter with Lottenbach. It's a relatively easy class if you already know your stuff as a philosophy major (finding/formulating/analyzing arguments, writing philosophy papers and exams, philosophers, etc.), but it is a difficult class for those with little philosophy background because Lottenbach is a rather poor lecturer. Don't get me wrong, the man is a genius, but he says "uh" "right" and "so" about 237 times each per lecture which can get distracting, and, more importantly, he takes the most roundabout ways to answer the simplest of question (which my non-major friends found confusing), making it difficult to understand some of the material. I guess it also depends on your TA, go for James or Mandel, those guys rock.

In addition, Lottenbach assigns rather obscure authors (Descartes was the only commonly known one we read), so if you're looking for a good introductory course so you can sound smart and talk about those philosophers all your friends know only by name, this isn't it. Lottenbach's expectations are certainly not high, but his lectures are rather boring, his answers to questions obtuse, his speech distracting, and his assignments obscure. All in all, not the most difficult class on paper, but rather hard given Lottenbach's style, especially if you aren't a major. Like I said though, he's a genius, so if you want to put up with his downsides to learn from someone who's read all the material in French, Latin, Greek, German, Italian, or English and basically seems to literally know everything, then take him, but be warned, Lottenbach's speech and way of answering questions makes things hard.

June 20, 2004
Sherrilyn Roush Full Profile > N/A Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness
No reviews have been written yet.
Sherrilyn Roush See Full Profile

Overall N/A Easiness N/A Workload N/A Clarity N/A Helpfulness N/A

Most Helpful Review
No reviews have been written yet.
1 of 1

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!