PHILOS M175
Topics in Philosophy of Religion
Description: (Same as Religion M175.) Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Requisite: course 21 or 22. Intensive investigation of one or two topics or works in philosophy of religion, such as attributes of God, arguments for or against existence of God, or relation between religion and ethics. Topics announced each term. May be repeated for credit with consent of instructor.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2025 - Genuinely the worst. Johnson is insanely disorganized in every way possible. From his notes on the board to his grading he is nothing but disorganized. Turned in weekly Reading Summaries that were never graded. Papers were graded harshly with little explanation even in office hours. Got so off his own syllabus we had to do our final paper during spring break. Pretty sure he just gave out As to avoid an uproar and student complaints that would get him fired. While I went to every lecture, they were all a waste of time. He really needs to get slides so he can stay on track. Handwriting can use some work as well. Incredibly slow to grade. Very nit picky and rude in his comments. Speaks in a very condescending way especially when considering that the way he teaches leaves you unsure of if he even understands the material that he is paid to teach. I wouldn't reccomend him or any of his classes to ANYONE even senior philosophy students.
Winter 2025 - Genuinely the worst. Johnson is insanely disorganized in every way possible. From his notes on the board to his grading he is nothing but disorganized. Turned in weekly Reading Summaries that were never graded. Papers were graded harshly with little explanation even in office hours. Got so off his own syllabus we had to do our final paper during spring break. Pretty sure he just gave out As to avoid an uproar and student complaints that would get him fired. While I went to every lecture, they were all a waste of time. He really needs to get slides so he can stay on track. Handwriting can use some work as well. Incredibly slow to grade. Very nit picky and rude in his comments. Speaks in a very condescending way especially when considering that the way he teaches leaves you unsure of if he even understands the material that he is paid to teach. I wouldn't reccomend him or any of his classes to ANYONE even senior philosophy students.
AD
1 of 1
