PSYCH 127
Abnormal Psychology
Description:
Units:
Units:
2 of 2
Most Helpful Review
Good lecturer. Her class is interesting. She gets a little confused on her own ideas from time to time and has to start her sentences over - happens often. Midterms and finals very tricky, even though she says they are not. Everyone I knew from class was in the B range. I heard the other professor that teaches this class is even harder in his grading, so for that reason I recommend Repetti, otherwise I would move on. If I would have to rate her as a professor, I would give her a B-
Good lecturer. Her class is interesting. She gets a little confused on her own ideas from time to time and has to start her sentences over - happens often. Midterms and finals very tricky, even though she says they are not. Everyone I knew from class was in the B range. I heard the other professor that teaches this class is even harder in his grading, so for that reason I recommend Repetti, otherwise I would move on. If I would have to rate her as a professor, I would give her a B-
Most Helpful Review
Yee is a pretty good lecturer. She is not amazing, but she is interesting enough to keep your attention. She also explains the material reasonably. Her tests, however, are absurd. I studied all the important stuff like how the psychopathologies work, diagnosis, treatment and subtypes. Studying the important stuff, however, got me a C. I expected questions like 'how does schizoprenia work', 'how do you treat mania', or 'how can one differentiate various anxiety disorders'. Rather, there were questions like 'in the video you saw in class, what disease did mary have?' (this was an actual question that appeared on a test.) Given that we saw multiple videos and I didnt take notes on the names of the patients, I could only guess. It was funny how the test covered so much irrevelent stuff that I am sure a Clinical Psychologist with a PHD would not have gotten an A without memorizing unimpotant bulletpoints. Furthermore she is not very helpful. I missed a week of school with 103 fever and had to miss a test, and Yee would not let me make it up or do anything about it. Lastly, if she is co-teaching with Repetti I recommend you not take the course. Repetti is the worst and most unhelpful teacher I have ever had.
Yee is a pretty good lecturer. She is not amazing, but she is interesting enough to keep your attention. She also explains the material reasonably. Her tests, however, are absurd. I studied all the important stuff like how the psychopathologies work, diagnosis, treatment and subtypes. Studying the important stuff, however, got me a C. I expected questions like 'how does schizoprenia work', 'how do you treat mania', or 'how can one differentiate various anxiety disorders'. Rather, there were questions like 'in the video you saw in class, what disease did mary have?' (this was an actual question that appeared on a test.) Given that we saw multiple videos and I didnt take notes on the names of the patients, I could only guess. It was funny how the test covered so much irrevelent stuff that I am sure a Clinical Psychologist with a PHD would not have gotten an A without memorizing unimpotant bulletpoints. Furthermore she is not very helpful. I missed a week of school with 103 fever and had to miss a test, and Yee would not let me make it up or do anything about it. Lastly, if she is co-teaching with Repetti I recommend you not take the course. Repetti is the worst and most unhelpful teacher I have ever had.
AD
2 of 2
