PUB AFF 149
International Housing Policy
Description: Lecture, three hours; discussion, one hour. Study of housing policies in diverse range of countries, contrasting those with U.S. housing policy. Examination of policies in different contexts to better understand how institutional, economic, legal, and cultural contexts shape housing policies and housing outcomes. Letter grading.
Units: 4.0
Units: 4.0
1 of 1
Most Helpful Review
Winter 2022 - Paavo is one of the best professors I have ever had at UCLA. He is super smart (and you can actually feel that through his teaching) and very approachable. Unfortunately, his office hours were full almost all the time (so you need to book in advance to get a slot to talk to him). But he is super helpful if you reach out, and I recommend dropping in his office hours at least once if you take this class. In terms of contents, I admitted that they were so much (and maybe too much) to be covered in ten weeks. We covered case studies from more than ten countries in different lessons from housing subsidy, finance, infrastructure, urban upgrading. You may struggle in the first few weeks, and everyone will do because the topics would be totally new to you. The readings were very dense, but I think they were beneficial if you got to read them. The videos, especially the professor's interview and Housing podcasts (by Luskin), were very cool and helpful for understanding. The lecture summarized the key concepts for each country that you need to know, and I think Paavo did a great job of having engaging lectures in this class. For workload, the class is definitely not a light class. There are a 15-page lengthy policy memo that you can do individually or with a partner, the revised version of that memo, and an 800-word editorial piece. You get to write a policy memo about an aspect of another country's housing policy (apart from the U.S.). The op-ed is the way to present your argument on how to adapt another country's housing policy in the U.S. For me, the writing assignments, especially the memo, were super long and took a lot of time. They were very challenging, but I had learned a lot from writing them. There is one reading presentation that you do in a group to present in a different module (need to do only once). The final exam was in-person, but the questions asked about core concepts in the class, so I think you should be fine if you study. He gave us the lists of questions beforehand, and he picked written exams based on those questions. Overall, I would recommend this class. This is one of the most favorite classes I have ever taken so far. The workload for this class is definitely not the lightest, but I'm sure you will gain something so valuable. The contents and professor were super cool. You can really see that Paavo put a lot of effort to structure this class from scratch because there is no such textbook that would comprehensively cover all the contents in this class for sure, so definitely worth taking this!
Winter 2022 - Paavo is one of the best professors I have ever had at UCLA. He is super smart (and you can actually feel that through his teaching) and very approachable. Unfortunately, his office hours were full almost all the time (so you need to book in advance to get a slot to talk to him). But he is super helpful if you reach out, and I recommend dropping in his office hours at least once if you take this class. In terms of contents, I admitted that they were so much (and maybe too much) to be covered in ten weeks. We covered case studies from more than ten countries in different lessons from housing subsidy, finance, infrastructure, urban upgrading. You may struggle in the first few weeks, and everyone will do because the topics would be totally new to you. The readings were very dense, but I think they were beneficial if you got to read them. The videos, especially the professor's interview and Housing podcasts (by Luskin), were very cool and helpful for understanding. The lecture summarized the key concepts for each country that you need to know, and I think Paavo did a great job of having engaging lectures in this class. For workload, the class is definitely not a light class. There are a 15-page lengthy policy memo that you can do individually or with a partner, the revised version of that memo, and an 800-word editorial piece. You get to write a policy memo about an aspect of another country's housing policy (apart from the U.S.). The op-ed is the way to present your argument on how to adapt another country's housing policy in the U.S. For me, the writing assignments, especially the memo, were super long and took a lot of time. They were very challenging, but I had learned a lot from writing them. There is one reading presentation that you do in a group to present in a different module (need to do only once). The final exam was in-person, but the questions asked about core concepts in the class, so I think you should be fine if you study. He gave us the lists of questions beforehand, and he picked written exams based on those questions. Overall, I would recommend this class. This is one of the most favorite classes I have ever taken so far. The workload for this class is definitely not the lightest, but I'm sure you will gain something so valuable. The contents and professor were super cool. You can really see that Paavo put a lot of effort to structure this class from scratch because there is no such textbook that would comprehensively cover all the contents in this class for sure, so definitely worth taking this!
AD
1 of 1
