Really straightforward class. The course is graded on three problem sets and participation. The problem sets are composed of 3-4 questions and you are required to write 5-8 pages for each set. The first two problem sets are based on the Republic and the last one is based on selections of De Anima. As long as you do the readings and read the slides Crager posts online they are pretty easy and straightforward to do. There are no quizzes but I recommended attending each lecture because it really does make a difference. Crager is a cool professor but his lectures are slightly boring. Overall really straightforward class as long you keep up on everything - there are no surprises.

Professor Crager made the class very interesting. The grading is dependent on your T.A., but the assignments are basically the same as 100A.

Professor Crager is a very bright and insightful person. The class was graded on a curve, but that wasn't announced until later in the course. (I think it was supposed to be used as a motivational thing.) Attendance is optional and he released his slides on the course website. If you want to do well in this course, then just make sure to do a lot of the reading. If this is required for you, definitely take it with Crager.

Prof. Crager's class is very straightforward, and he is an incredibly intelligent guy. It's amazing to just ask him questions sometimes and hear what he says because his understanding of philosophy seems so deep and vivid. I came into this class as a non-philosophy major, so I was pretty nervous since philosophy isn't an easy subject. But his expectations are very clear, and he was very good at explaining difficult concepts, so his class wasn't very hard. I also lucked out w/ an amazing TA- if you're able to get Nefeli know that you are very lucky! Your T.A. is actually entirely responsible for your grade because your entire grade is composed of attendance/participation in section and problem sets (similar to an essay) that the TA grades.
You don't have to show up to class but you should try to make it to the majority of them because Crager goes way more in-depth than what's written in the lecture slides. Overall, if you go to every section and make an effort to communicate w/ your T.A. about the problem sets you should be able to get a good grade in this class.

Selling both “Plato - The Republic” and “Basic Works of Aristotle” (required textbooks) for super cheap! Willing to negotiate the price because I’m moving away after I graduate in June and need to get rid of these books.

(Will delete this post when books are sold so it’s still available)
Text **********

Professor Crager was extremely helpful and accommodating. His lecture materials made the actual material so easy to understand. He made time for extra office hours. 10/10

Professor Crager always gave thorough lectures with slides, he would also take questions but would take a long time to answer them. In doing that, people never had enough time to get their questions in. He was great at lecturing, but upon receiving our grades from the first assignment many students were surprised. The TA's had a much different criteria than the professor, therefore throwing off all of the students. Then, if that was not unfortunate enough, he combined the last two assignments to equal 65% of our grade which produced a lot of anxiety. I understand that this was likely because he was not used to teaching virtually therefore was not prepared. He was a great lecturer but rushed the assignments at the end which was stressful (I had TA Sahiba, she grades harsh, and does not give helpful feedback). No tests, just problem sets and participation which is earned in sections.

There was supposed to be 3 problem sets (similar to an essay), but due to poor planning, the last two problem sets were combined to be worth 65% of our grade. The class was curved (87% for an A- and 91% for an A) and he offered a chance for you to re-write the first problem set if you got below an A-. Your grade is entirely dependent upon your TA. If your TA grades harshly, sucks for you. His pre-filmed lecture videos and slides are very concise but he takes a VERY long time to answer students' questions during live lectures.

I thought this class was really interesting. At first, I was a little lost, but I would say watching the lectures he posts and the readings are very important, as well as taking notes. While the class can be kinda challenging, if you are willing to put in the effort to understand the content, it should be an easy A. The first half of the class is focused on Al-Farabi, who is a little easier to understand, and the second half is Avicenna, who has some more wild thoughts, but if you attend the discussion, it'll make it more digestible. Would take this class again!

So I'm going to be honest. i took this class during my first quarter at UCLA (I'm a first year transfer), during COVID-19, and i stopped showing up to lectures and discussions after week 3. We only had two graded assignments, both were essays, but one was worth 65% of our grade. This scared me because i fell really behind and stopped doing all the readings but I'm honestly great at working under pressure so i managed to leave the class with an A-. I can't really speak much of the professor but my TA was extremely helpful and the version of Plato's Republic that we read was easy to understand. From my experience, it's honestly an easy A just keep up with the readings and watch lectures and videos (I still managed without watching any tho, but i don't recommend it).