Cons: time management is bad. This is just a recent example that I remember, but there are plenty of other times: she spent 15 minutes explaining how to complete the course evaluations during lecture, but it ended up that the evaluations were pass due so that was for naught. Basically she spends too much time over explaining and over complicating things that could be said in a much more succinct manner. She’s reluctant to discuss grades and is slightly passive aggressive when it’s brung up. There was only one grade inputted and the rest were inputted the day grades were due, so the class was left in the dark about grades.

Grade breakdown:

20% discussion posts - this required a lot of elbow grease and for what. group based work

20% podcast - group based. Decently easy imo, but could vary based on the topic you’re given

10% film paper

5% final reflection paper - you gotta write about what you learned in the class and what you liked/ didn’t like in the class.

5% office hour meeting

40% final research paper - write about covid and how it impacted global regulatory systems. Prompts gonna vary per quarter I suppose.

Overall this class was fine, but it was a lot of work and combined with the bad time management and late grading left a bad taste.

I would really hope UCLA does not bring Adina on as a professor. Although she was clearly well versed in the subject matter, she did not have many of the other skills expected of a professor. She was very reluctant to have students question or debate with her and even became hostile, defensive or passive aggressive when this happened. Furthermore she did not create an environment where students were encouraged to ask questions and to interact with her outside of class. This has never been an issue for me at ucla and every professor i’ve had so far enjoys a spirited debate on the subject matter, especially if it shows that a student is thinking critically about the topics at hand. Moreover all my professors in the past have been very responsive to emails and quite friendly and welcoming in office hours and Adina was not. In her defense however this was probably an unusual experience for her because the course was online.

Adina was nice and clearly cared about what she was teaching. However, she literally only inputted one grade the entire quarter and no one knew what their final grades were going to be until the day they were actually due. This was super frustrating and I wish there was greater transparency.

Adina was willing to take 10 minute meetings with students, which really helped me with the assignments. Overall, it was a pretty chill class. However, she did not count extra credit in the final grade and graded everything on the last day possible, which left many students in the dark.

I understand that she was probably overworked (it was her and one other grader for a class of 70 students), but better time management would be good.

She knew what she was talking about to the point that she could engage the class in critical discussions. She required her students to read some interesting readings. However, in the lecture, she often talks about concepts without clearly defining them, though not always, which is problematic since many of her students were not majoring or minoring in the field, so they had no background on the topic. She is nice enough though she gets a little testy when it comes to questions she does not want to answer, as stated in other reviews, specifically when it came to grades. She waited until the last day to input grades, which left many students in the dark. While fairness is a myth, I think a good professor wants her students to succeed; yet, it did not seem to be the case here. It would have been better for her to input each assignment and forum grades separately and add feedback since some students suspect that she never included the extra credit though she says she did. While it is possible that she did, her students don't know that. We are just supposed to take her word for it, which is not in the nature of many, especially with helicopter parents breathing down on our necks. Furthermore, while she made room for students to ask questions during lectures, she did not try to go the extra mile for her students, as many other UCLA professors do. In my opinion, as a professor to be, she needs to work on being more available for her students (not only 10 minutes) instead of possibly just researching because she wasn't very helpful or accommodating, as seen with the responses of my other peers in our group chat. Many claimed that she sucked at responding to emails, among other things. If you have to take her, just actively read the material to truly understand the arguments and evidence, write summaries for all of them, ask questions about the material in class, go to the writing center, and always try to go the extra mile. Just remember its one class and that it doesn't define you.

The instructor clearly knows her stuff but does not present it in an engaging way that builds student interest. She assigned a group podcast assignment that did not contribute to our understanding of the course material whatsoever. We had a final paper about any current globalization-related topic using concepts from readings and lectures. Most of the readings were inapplicable to any globalization-related topic besides the WTO, which made it kind of hard. I managed just about to stretch it to be related to international criminal law. I'm not sure if this is the fault of the instructor or the course itself, but I feel like far more exciting aspects of globalization could have been discussed in the class.

Took this class during the TA strike and she was the least accommodating and least helpful towards students. Told us she wouldn't grade any of our previously assigned work bc it was the TA's job and not hers. In her email told us she knew that not giving us a grade for the class would impact us negatively including those on financial aid, but to take it up with the UC President instead. Wouldn't answer student emails with questions around midterm grading. if you can just avoid taking any of her classes, she doesn't care about students

Unfortunately, I would not recommend taking this class as a GE. The entire grade is based on a group project, final, midterm, and discussion participation, and as a result, there is no clarity to what your grade might be. You’re expected to memorize authors and ideas of multiple 30+ page readings, that only have like 1 key idea related to the course. While I really appreciated my TA and her discussion section, the amount of participation needed was extremely unclear. Slides discussed in lecture were extremely vague and didn’t help much in terms of the final and midterm.

I think it was an extremely interesting class that provided great insight into the major and comprised of contemporary readings , podcasts and one Q&A with professionals in the field. The discussion questions were based on readings which were interesting and fun to read! The only thing I disliked was with regard to grades and how they were handled. They could have been told to us sooner so we accordingly could plan for our finals. Also, it would be nice to have had some more time with the professor one on one and had her reply to emails a bit more regularly. Otherwise, I think the class content was pretty interesting and I'd take it again save for more transparency in grading and extra credit!

This class is not the easy GE you expect it to be. As an incoming freshman, I signed up to take this class with the hope of it being interesting and easy. It was neither. The topics, homework assignments, the readings are all super vague, boring and irrelevant to the material that you are tested on during the midterm and final exam. Lectures make it painfully difficult to stay awake as the professor talks about case studies that genuinely do nothing to further my knowledge on the greater concepts of the course. The professor is also frequently 10 minutes late to lecture. You are expected to do multiple 10-40 page readings to prepare for each class, which I simply did not have the time to get done. For the tests, the professor makes you memorize the names of these authors from readings. For studying, I memorized the names of these authors instead of actually learning about the concepts from the course, as the professor instructed. This class has the potential to be interesting with its concepts, but to be honest, this professor simply made it a complete and total let down. I did enjoy my discussion section with TA Christina Toma, so if you can take this with her, it makes it less dreadful. But in lecture, this professor just makes it a painful course to suffer through. The midterm and final also consisted of many vague and ambiguous multiple choice questions that led to poor scores and questions about content from my friends and I. As a political science major, avoid this class with this professor at all costs.