This is a review for Eng 128: Postcolonial and Transnational Theory.

The course breakdown was:
10% class participation
10% participation in a "Fish Bowl" discussion
20% annotated bibliography (2 pages, graded on completion)
60% 2 papers (4-6 pages)
In addition, we brought in (ungraded) abstracts for our papers about a week before they were due

Behdad is very understanding, and as you can probably tell, a lot of the class was graded on effort/completion. The grading of the papers was done by a TA who we didn't see except for one guest lecture, but he was very fair and provided helpful comments. My favorite parts of the class were reading the novels ("A Grain of Wheat" and "Abeng") and watching the film "The Battle of Algiers." In hindsight, I think a class on postcolonial theory should be made a mandatory part of the college curriculum. It helps us understand how absolutely crippling colonialism is to a country's people - even when the colonial force officially withdraws, it doesn't do it before completely destroying the country's natural resources and morale, and it never really stops kicking it even when it's down.

Unfortunately, even with all of the pros listed above, I still found the class pretty dull. I took it to fulfill the critical theory requirement for English departmental honors (for creative writing, which should tell you how much I enjoyed theory going in), and I found most of the theoretical essays dense and confusing. Behdad also went through quite a few slides every lecture, so I was copying pages of notes every day with the only reprieve being the fishbowl (which I ironically started looking forward to just to break the monotony). I did find parts of the class interesting, but I REALLY had to see the forest for the trees.