Allison Carruth
Department of English
AD
4.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 31, 2015


Carruth is a well organized, interesting lecturer/professor, has useful content on slides (she uploads them), presents complicated concepts explained clearly, and avoids filler activities during lecture. She doesn't depend on Q/A to fill lecture time, or hold you to a participation grade. She leaves room for discussion, but lecture never grinds to a halt if people are not interested in going there.

She's a lit prof who's interested in the big picture. Her lectures all focus on analyzing novels through a small set of themes and concepts, so you more or less know what to focus on while reading. All the same, none of her assignments force you to memorize her ideas, so you get plenty of freedom to either reiterate her claims or do your own thing.

The workload and assigned papers are manageable, she gives detailed feedback, and is a fair grader. In terms of grading expectations, she is extremely straightforward with all assigned work including the final.

Take a class with her if you can, she's an amazing lecturer.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 31, 2015


Carruth is a well organized, interesting lecturer/professor, has useful content on slides (she uploads them), presents complicated concepts explained clearly, and avoids filler activities during lecture. She doesn't depend on Q/A to fill lecture time, or hold you to a participation grade. She leaves room for discussion, but lecture never grinds to a halt if people are not interested in going there.

She's a lit prof who's interested in the big picture. Her lectures all focus on analyzing novels through a small set of themes and concepts, so you more or less know what to focus on while reading. All the same, none of her assignments force you to memorize her ideas, so you get plenty of freedom to either reiterate her claims or do your own thing.

The workload and assigned papers are manageable, she gives detailed feedback, and is a fair grader. In terms of grading expectations, she is extremely straightforward with all assigned work including the final.

Take a class with her if you can, she's an amazing lecturer.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!