Allison McComb
Department of Education
AD
2.6
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
55.8%
46.5%
37.2%
27.9%
18.6%
9.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

65.2%
54.3%
43.4%
32.6%
21.7%
10.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

54.6%
45.5%
36.4%
27.3%
18.2%
9.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 19, 2014

The first time she taught EDU 92F, it was honestly very disorganized. She's probably better now, I'll give her that but she was never available because she was so involved in other ORL related activities. Teaching was not her priority the quarter I took it or it was just rough because again, it was her first time. She is a nice person but I personally didn't feel inspired by this class like everyone said I would with the previous professor who taught it. She's nice though and the course is not terrible. The people are really nice and the class is easy. Easy A for sure. There are TAs that grade your papers and then "discussion leaders" that were students who had previously taken the course. Hopefully this class has improve a lot but I honestly didn't feel that I enjoyed it that much. The best part was discussion leaders and my classmates. Lecture never inspired me.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Aug. 19, 2014

The first time she taught EDU 92F, it was honestly very disorganized. She's probably better now, I'll give her that but she was never available because she was so involved in other ORL related activities. Teaching was not her priority the quarter I took it or it was just rough because again, it was her first time. She is a nice person but I personally didn't feel inspired by this class like everyone said I would with the previous professor who taught it. She's nice though and the course is not terrible. The people are really nice and the class is easy. Easy A for sure. There are TAs that grade your papers and then "discussion leaders" that were students who had previously taken the course. Hopefully this class has improve a lot but I honestly didn't feel that I enjoyed it that much. The best part was discussion leaders and my classmates. Lecture never inspired me.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.6
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.6 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!