Amada Armenta
Department of Public Affairs
AD
4.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 4.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
51.2%
42.7%
34.2%
25.6%
17.1%
8.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.6%
47.2%
37.8%
28.3%
18.9%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

62.6%
52.2%
41.7%
31.3%
20.9%
10.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

83.2%
69.3%
55.5%
41.6%
27.7%
13.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.3%
46.9%
37.5%
28.1%
18.8%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

58.1%
48.4%
38.7%
29.0%
19.4%
9.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (6)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
July 4, 2023

Armenta really cares about her students and takes the time to get to know them and even learn their names, all 130 of them. The weekly assignments are clear and attainable and help you better understand lecture. Both the Professors and TAs are highly responsive to student feedback and I had a great experience.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 30, 2023

Professor Armenta was great. She was a really good lecturer, even when the material could be a tad bit boring (most of the time it was actually pretty interesting though). Didn't hate it, didn't love it, but it's required for public affairs and I liked it well enough. I definitely learned a lot about qualitative reasoning, which isn't something most people have ever used before since quantitative methods are always seen as more "scientific." Also shoutout to my TA John for being so awesome.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 11, 2023

I really loved this class! Professor Armenta is knowledgable, non intimidating, and helpful. I saw her a couple of times for office hours and she helped me out with my final project. She also didn't grade harshly at all, and discussions were well spent and engaging. I really enjoyed the interview project and how we built on it for transcribing and coding. I did not know what interview coding was before this class, but now I feel confident in it. Note that you do have small almost weekly assignments but they were usually very easy. Professor Armenta also likes to know her students and would memorize things about them that they wrote on notecards on the first day of class. Classes weren't recorded, but she posted the slides and last year's recording on the website.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Jan. 4, 2023

I loved this class! I don't think lectures were mandatory (I didn't attend), and even if they were I wouldn't mind because Professor Armenta is an engaging lecturer and the class content is interesting.

Shoutout to my TA Arjun for making the class 1000x more interesting. Definitely take it with him if you can!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A+
March 24, 2020

Professor Armenta makes a compelling case for why we need qualitative literacy to be taught to people as much as quantitative methods is. I really enjoyed this class. I think the work, activities, and topics were very unique and interesting. I would definitely recommend this class to people who aren't public affairs majors.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A+
March 24, 2020

Professor Armenta is a great lecturer. This class only met once a week and she thoroughly explained any upcoming assignments and I always left class comfortable that I could accurately complete them. The TAs were also very helpful in clearing up any misunderstandings. There is no midterm, the final is a portfolio composed of questions answered through concepts taught throughout the quarter. Her assigned readings are actually very interesting, she goes over them in class but it helps to read them ahead of time. Attendance is taken in section. The only stressful assignment during the quarter was one in which we had to conduct an hour-long interview and then transcribe it word for word. Overall a great upper-division course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
July 4, 2023

Armenta really cares about her students and takes the time to get to know them and even learn their names, all 130 of them. The weekly assignments are clear and attainable and help you better understand lecture. Both the Professors and TAs are highly responsive to student feedback and I had a great experience.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Jan. 30, 2023

Professor Armenta was great. She was a really good lecturer, even when the material could be a tad bit boring (most of the time it was actually pretty interesting though). Didn't hate it, didn't love it, but it's required for public affairs and I liked it well enough. I definitely learned a lot about qualitative reasoning, which isn't something most people have ever used before since quantitative methods are always seen as more "scientific." Also shoutout to my TA John for being so awesome.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A+
Jan. 11, 2023

I really loved this class! Professor Armenta is knowledgable, non intimidating, and helpful. I saw her a couple of times for office hours and she helped me out with my final project. She also didn't grade harshly at all, and discussions were well spent and engaging. I really enjoyed the interview project and how we built on it for transcribing and coding. I did not know what interview coding was before this class, but now I feel confident in it. Note that you do have small almost weekly assignments but they were usually very easy. Professor Armenta also likes to know her students and would memorize things about them that they wrote on notecards on the first day of class. Classes weren't recorded, but she posted the slides and last year's recording on the website.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: A
Jan. 4, 2023

I loved this class! I don't think lectures were mandatory (I didn't attend), and even if they were I wouldn't mind because Professor Armenta is an engaging lecturer and the class content is interesting.

Shoutout to my TA Arjun for making the class 1000x more interesting. Definitely take it with him if you can!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A+
March 24, 2020

Professor Armenta makes a compelling case for why we need qualitative literacy to be taught to people as much as quantitative methods is. I really enjoyed this class. I think the work, activities, and topics were very unique and interesting. I would definitely recommend this class to people who aren't public affairs majors.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A+
March 24, 2020

Professor Armenta is a great lecturer. This class only met once a week and she thoroughly explained any upcoming assignments and I always left class comfortable that I could accurately complete them. The TAs were also very helpful in clearing up any misunderstandings. There is no midterm, the final is a portfolio composed of questions answered through concepts taught throughout the quarter. Her assigned readings are actually very interesting, she goes over them in class but it helps to read them ahead of time. Attendance is taken in section. The only stressful assignment during the quarter was one in which we had to conduct an hour-long interview and then transcribe it word for word. Overall a great upper-division course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 4.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!