the sweetest prof I ever had. Don't listen to anyone that says you can't understand him literally just sit closer and you're chillin. He's so cool and pls engage and talk to him people tend to pack up early but if you take this class PLS BE NICE TO HIM and protect him at all costs 🙏. Easy class and its comprised of 2 multiple choice quizzes and an essay. Pretty straightforward and the topics are kind of common sense.

I took this as a GE and it is a pretty easy as long as you stayed on top of the lecture slides readings. I personally just did the slides before class and the readings in my free time. He quotes from the textbook a lot but I feel like reading the textbook gave me more context and examples for the concepts. Overall the concepts were pretty easy and I think that as long as you put in the work you will be good. The study guides given were useful and were things that were on the test. I got an A in the class but lowk I hate that for the essay, the prompt is super broad. Your TA is the one grading it so I would personally just go to office hours to ask if your structure and idea is good. I don't think that going to lectures were useful at all and only went bc it was "mandatory."
Here are my notes from the lecture slides and the textbook if you want to just what concepts there are
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a_DbYUOJyh9q-MhG8fVvtjnOfGiGHj3kCYzyNJoZo5Y/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.61q5xa7xdnru

This man is so sweet and lowkey so funny sometimes. You can get away with reading from the textbook but he is really interesting to talk to after class. The exams were easy but I didn't put in as much time as I should have, so they were more difficult for me. Just read the book and you'll be fine. There was barely any homework-- just discussions and maybe some quizzes. There were just 2 exams and an essay, but all very doable. Would definitely recommend him

Overall an easy GE. Not a heavy workload, but you definitely need to be well prepared for the exams because even though they are multiple-choice, the answers are very similar and it is hard to tell sometimes.

Super easy class with two multiple choice tests and one short essay. Attending lecture is basically pointless since he teaches straight from the book. I just read the chapters and that's all I needed to do well on the tests.

Nothing grand, though the class might be fun for anyone interested in sociology. The assignments were just weekly 1-page reflections on the assigned reading for the week - the reflections were graded, though I'm not 100% sure what the criteria was (the averages pretty much stabilized 90-95 by week 3). The readings were, for the most part, research papers related to the topic covered that week in SOCIOL 1. In terms of the actual class period, the professor would usually give a 30-minute talk related to the reading, then ask the class to discuss/give opinions on it. (There usually weren't many.) Notably, this class doesn't really feed back into SOCIOL 1 - it won't give you an advantage there, for instance. That being said, I thought the readings were pretty interesting - they were generally a mix of major past studies and a few of the professor's own papers, which I thought was cool.

This class is an honors seminar that's meant to be taken in conjunction with Sociology 1. The seminar only meets once a week for 50 minutes, so it's not that much of a commitment, but there was some difficulty to understanding the research articles we were supposed to read and discuss every week (the main component of the class). It was also rather hard to come up with insightful commentary to put in the one-page weekly memos, but with time one gets better at it. On the bright side, you're only required to write 6 the entire quarter so there are three weeks where you can take a break. Villarreal was good at starting conversations, but the weekly discussions were more of us shelling out our opinions one at a time to him than a discussion between peers. Overall, a valuable seminar that lets you dive a bit deeper into Sociology 1 content and gives you a good outlet to get to know the professor in a smaller setting!

Definitely take this if you need a fairly manageable GE. Villarreal does tend to read straight off the slides with minimum elaboration, but please do come to lecture anyways! He is the sweetest old man who obviously loves the topics he teaches (especially when it comes to the statistics part of it all), and he appreciates any and all student participation during lecture time. As for the two midterms, you will do fine as long as you study ALL the terms thoroughly (even ones not listed on the study guide Villareal provides), and I would highly recommend weaving through the textbook as it will list examples that may be applicable to the midterm multiple choice questions. On a final note, your enjoyment of your class will depend mostly, if not entirely on the TA you are assigned to. My TA was not very lax on grading and tended to be unaccommodating to their students, so I had little to no chances to improve my grade despite countless emails and office hours, so please keep that in mind!

This is an easy GE if you make sure to do the readings and pay attention to the terms. There's barely any homework except for a weekly discussion post and a group memo that you do during discussion sections. The professor's slides are basically completely copy and pasted from the textbook and he's hard to understand sometimes. The midterms might be confusing if you don't study the vocabulary.

I took this class to figure out if I was interested in sociology as a major or not and didn’t like it. The class was so easy that I would still recommend it as a GE, but the lectures were very boring and repetitive. The lecture slides went over the exact same stuff that the textbook did, so reading isn't super necessary. Also the professor was pretty boring and mostly read off of the slides (which were direct repeats of the textbook), and mumbled a lot. The midterm tests also had a lot of really frustratingly worded questions that were hard to do well on even if you understood the material. I also hated the essay prompt, it was very vague and simple which made it difficult to write on, also there was very little guidance on what was expected of us in the paper. The discussion sections were good, and Weinger is a great TA! He was very helpful and understanding. I learned a lot more in sections than lectures.