Anjali Arondekar
Department of Comparative Literature
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Useful Textbooks
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Participation Matters
  • Needs Textbook
  • Appropriately Priced Materials

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

30.4%
25.4%
20.3%
15.2%
10.1%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A-
Sept. 10, 2019

I think she is very intelligent, very gifted, and definitely knows what she's talking about. However, I think that there are a lot of things that she could improve about this class.
Good things:
- I liked the readings. They were interesting and weren't conventional "white" authors.
- discussions were LONG but engaging and interesting.
class was only an hour (ish).
Bad things:
- a lot of reading. You HAVE to do the readings for the most part because sometimes in class she'll call on random people to interpret the readings or give them their opinion (and this was so nerve-wracking, if you don't read and she calls on you, G bless).
- she is not a good lecturer. no slides or pictures are provided, and she can be unclear about the concepts she talks about. she expects you to just listen and absorb everything, but not everyone can learn that way.
- she wasn't understanding of the fact that not everybody can read the books / works all the time because we have midterms for other classes.
- she is very very opinionated. which isn't a bad thing on its own, but if you offer an interpretation of a work that she doesn't like, she'll disregard it (even though she herself said that literature itself is subjective due to the audience's variety in culture, history, and language).
- the grading. don't get less than a B on an essay cuz it could screw up your grade for the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A-
June 28, 2019

The discussion sessions are definitely way more important than the lectures, participation during discussions are a huge chunk of your grade. There are three papers in total, two for the midterms and one for the final. The midterm papers are 4 pages while the final paper is 6. The weekly readings are super important, and make sure to do them or you won't have anything to say during the discussions. Overall, I would take this class again with Professor Arondekar, she's funny and witty and the lectures were engaging and very insightful. I really liked that the materials came from all over the world, not just the west.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: S
June 10, 2019

If you're looking for a Writing II GE, literally any GE would be better!

If you want to get publicly shamed in front of an entire lecture hall for not doing a reading, this is the class for you! This professor literally did this to some students in the class and made them leave in the middle of a lecture. This is her main tactic to ensure you do A LOT of reading for each lecture.

As for the grading, it is 50% for 2 papers and 25% for participation and 25% for the final paper. The grading is all about the TA so you better pray to get a good one or you're in real trouble.

Her lectures are literally her talking for an hour with no slides or any visual aids. If you aren't an auditory learner, good luck! For those who must take this class as Comparative Literature majors, I'd look to another professor to save yourself the pain.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A-
Sept. 10, 2019

I think she is very intelligent, very gifted, and definitely knows what she's talking about. However, I think that there are a lot of things that she could improve about this class.
Good things:
- I liked the readings. They were interesting and weren't conventional "white" authors.
- discussions were LONG but engaging and interesting.
class was only an hour (ish).
Bad things:
- a lot of reading. You HAVE to do the readings for the most part because sometimes in class she'll call on random people to interpret the readings or give them their opinion (and this was so nerve-wracking, if you don't read and she calls on you, G bless).
- she is not a good lecturer. no slides or pictures are provided, and she can be unclear about the concepts she talks about. she expects you to just listen and absorb everything, but not everyone can learn that way.
- she wasn't understanding of the fact that not everybody can read the books / works all the time because we have midterms for other classes.
- she is very very opinionated. which isn't a bad thing on its own, but if you offer an interpretation of a work that she doesn't like, she'll disregard it (even though she herself said that literature itself is subjective due to the audience's variety in culture, history, and language).
- the grading. don't get less than a B on an essay cuz it could screw up your grade for the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A-
June 28, 2019

The discussion sessions are definitely way more important than the lectures, participation during discussions are a huge chunk of your grade. There are three papers in total, two for the midterms and one for the final. The midterm papers are 4 pages while the final paper is 6. The weekly readings are super important, and make sure to do them or you won't have anything to say during the discussions. Overall, I would take this class again with Professor Arondekar, she's funny and witty and the lectures were engaging and very insightful. I really liked that the materials came from all over the world, not just the west.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: S
June 10, 2019

If you're looking for a Writing II GE, literally any GE would be better!

If you want to get publicly shamed in front of an entire lecture hall for not doing a reading, this is the class for you! This professor literally did this to some students in the class and made them leave in the middle of a lecture. This is her main tactic to ensure you do A LOT of reading for each lecture.

As for the grading, it is 50% for 2 papers and 25% for participation and 25% for the final paper. The grading is all about the TA so you better pray to get a good one or you're in real trouble.

Her lectures are literally her talking for an hour with no slides or any visual aids. If you aren't an auditory learner, good luck! For those who must take this class as Comparative Literature majors, I'd look to another professor to save yourself the pain.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Useful Textbooks
    (3)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (3)
  • Participation Matters
    (3)
  • Needs Textbook
    (2)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!