Bonnie Foote
Department of English
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 17, 2009

Uggghhhh.... I could not have been more enthusiastic about taking Professor Foote's Children's Lit class, and I couldn't have been more disappointed. She had way too many books to move through, and therefore it was nearly impossible to go into any in-depth analysis on the works. Student discussion drove the class, which at times is nice, but she NEVER seemed to lecture! I felt like I was sitting there for two hours listening to other people's arbitrary opinions. The focus of the class seemed to be on children's literacy, as opposed to the deeper theories and themes that are involved in the writing of children's literature. She was an incredibly sweet, enthusiastic person-- occasionally a little snobby-- but her heart was in the right place. I hope that over the next few years she can refine the class to make it more focused.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 17, 2009

Uggghhhh.... I could not have been more enthusiastic about taking Professor Foote's Children's Lit class, and I couldn't have been more disappointed. She had way too many books to move through, and therefore it was nearly impossible to go into any in-depth analysis on the works. Student discussion drove the class, which at times is nice, but she NEVER seemed to lecture! I felt like I was sitting there for two hours listening to other people's arbitrary opinions. The focus of the class seemed to be on children's literacy, as opposed to the deeper theories and themes that are involved in the writing of children's literature. She was an incredibly sweet, enthusiastic person-- occasionally a little snobby-- but her heart was in the right place. I hope that over the next few years she can refine the class to make it more focused.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!