Save yourself a quarter of agony and just take musicology or something.

Do not take this class if you are a south campus major looking for an easy GE. The material was uninteresting to me and the professor's lectures are extremely boring. You need to go to class because it is not bruincasted and the paintings she talks about are on the exam. It is a shitload of memorization for the midterm and final, and they are graded pretty harsh. The final is FOUR ESSAYS!!!!! There was one short paper that seemed relatively easy but it is graded very harshly. Also very TA dependent, mine was not helpful at all and graded the paper very harsh.

I love art and was really excited to take an Art History class at UCLA -- however, I was extremely disappointed at how difficult and arbitrary the grading is. The TAs purposely made the class way harder than it needed to be. I got a B+ on my paper and then later saw it posted on the examples of an A paper, which basically means the best grade you could get on that assignment was a B+. Professor Wilson is clearly very knowledgeable, but her style of lecturing tends to go on tangents and makes it difficult to discern what information is important to know for the exams. If you're looking for an easy GE, this is not the class for you.

Wilson is unyielding in her opinions of art and architecture (admittedly I am too and do not fault her for this), so it's difficult to formulate your own interpretations of works. She is more interested in features of architecture than paintings or sculpture. The lectures are a bit tiresome, but that could be because they're in a dark lecture hall. The readings are honestly more interesting than lectures because they introduced me to a variety of perspectives on European art. The TAs were wonderful! Very helpful and nice. Though this is a heavy work load, I enjoyed the class.

If you are a STEM major looking for an art course to satisfy your GEs, DO NOT take this class. This class is not supposed to require prior experience, which was exactly my situation, but it put me behind everyone else in the class by so much. Perhaps its just the logical STEM major in me, but this class made no sense to me and was extremely frustrating all quarter long. I do think Professor Wilson is kind and patient and wants the best for her students, but personally, I found her lectures to be contradictory and her tests to be insane: about 30 minutes to write an essay that should be beautiful & fully cohesive. I actually think I am a pretty good writer, just unfamiliar with writing about the material, and I struggled a lot, so if you are not a good writer, and if you don't like "interpreting" and "exploring" and "analyzing" art, maybe do yourself a favor and look for other classes.

But if you are a North Campus student, this might be a great class for you! The instructors I encountered were all pretty friendly, so you might find this class fantastic. I took this class with North Campus friends and they seemed to really enjoy it.

I wouldn't recommend this class for an easy GE, and if you don't like art history, do not take this class. You need to go to lecture in order to do well on exams. I didn't think lecture was too bad, but I was also slightly interested in the content, and I think if I didn't like it I would not be able to sit through class. You don't really need to do the reading, I never did it and just went to lecture which covered a lot of the exam material, but it also goes over material from lecture. The midterm and final exams were also very difficult and a TON of writing and memorization. I think Prof. Bronwen means well and wants to help out her students, but this class is mainly designed only for art history people.

yeah I'm that stem major who took this class as a GE and took that L. I think this class could be easy if you're knowledgeable with the Bible figures symbolisms and know how to write essays. but if you're not familiar with Christianity and/or essay writing makes you stay up until 4am procrastinating in pain, be ready to drop.

Readings were pretty useless and I wasted a lot of time trying to slog through those only to give up halfway through the quarter. Lectures were pretty boring and Professor Wilson would bring up a lot of interesting points about an art piece and then just never mention/expand upon those points again. Exams felt like AP Lit or Lang tests (a part of my life I would much rather forget) because of all the on-demand essays. I was really excited for this class at the beginning of the quarter because I like art history, but by the end it was just painful.

If you're already familiar with analyzing art or have some historical knowledge about the Renaissance era, the class will be much less challenging. But even without prior knowledge, if you attend (and take notes on) every lecture, participate in discussions, and do all the reading, you can do well. That said, the lectures are a little dry, and I personally skipped a few towards the end since I knew I can access the recordings later.

The class was graded on two comparison essays, a research project, and a final, which is another two comparison essays. It may sound like a light workload, but this meant I barely had any opportunities to learn from practice, so make sure to go to TA office hours to maximize your opportunities for feedback. The final project prompt was worded very vaguely - Prof. Wilson had to send 3 clarification emails and also clarify the requirements multiple times in lecture. No rubric was given, either.

All things considered, I did enjoy the course content. I've never given much thought to art before, so it was very eye-opening to see how other people synthesized the social, political, and even personal contexts around a work of art and produce unique and meaningful interpretations.

I've always liked history classes so I found the class to be interesting, but I do know that a lot of students found it to be very boring. Where this class turns out to be difficult is that your grade is almost entirely based on papers analyzing art pieces, this should be fine but they actually graded very harshly, at least my TA did. I got stuck with this class freshman fall quarter because all the other AGEs were full, so my advice is if you don't absolutely have to take this class then don't. The professor was very nice and I do feel that I learned quite a bit, but not worth it for that harsh grading.