- Home
- Search
- Casey Lynn Johnson
- MATH 135
AD
Based on 3 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
First MT was pretty manageable (average was ~85%), but second MT was extremely long and tedious (average was ~68%). The biggest complaint I have with this professor is that she does not curve or drop lowest midterm (unless you have a doctors note/ serious situation). As a result, if you did average on the second midterm like me, you're going to have to try your ass off just to clench an A-.
Really bad at teaching, but also has really high expectations. I've had bad professors before, but they normally know that they aren't the best at teaching and they curve the class. Based on her history of scores, she doesn't seem to curve too well, and it's surprising because she's probably the worst lecturer I've ever had. There are classes where I don't go to class and just use the textbook, and that's what you should do for her class. She teaches straight out of the textbook, but it's explained in the worst ways possible and I wanted to die every class. When she doesn't know how to explain something, she'll write a note like "pull from our brains" or "I won't go into specifics" and when you ask, she doesn't answer.
I don't know if she calls it her "humor" but sometimes her tone is just really condescending when you ask questions. On the last lecture, someone asked her to review something, and she said that she can't just make up numbers on the fly. Therefore, she did not elaborate on the topic. Honestly, she's just awful, and I would avoid her at all costs not just as a student but as a person. I've never felt more depressed in a class.
First MT was pretty manageable (average was ~85%), but second MT was extremely long and tedious (average was ~68%). The biggest complaint I have with this professor is that she does not curve or drop lowest midterm (unless you have a doctors note/ serious situation). As a result, if you did average on the second midterm like me, you're going to have to try your ass off just to clench an A-.
Really bad at teaching, but also has really high expectations. I've had bad professors before, but they normally know that they aren't the best at teaching and they curve the class. Based on her history of scores, she doesn't seem to curve too well, and it's surprising because she's probably the worst lecturer I've ever had. There are classes where I don't go to class and just use the textbook, and that's what you should do for her class. She teaches straight out of the textbook, but it's explained in the worst ways possible and I wanted to die every class. When she doesn't know how to explain something, she'll write a note like "pull from our brains" or "I won't go into specifics" and when you ask, she doesn't answer.
I don't know if she calls it her "humor" but sometimes her tone is just really condescending when you ask questions. On the last lecture, someone asked her to review something, and she said that she can't just make up numbers on the fly. Therefore, she did not elaborate on the topic. Honestly, she's just awful, and I would avoid her at all costs not just as a student but as a person. I've never felt more depressed in a class.
Based on 3 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.