Professor

Chee Wong

AD
2.4
Overall Ratings
Based on 20 Users
Easiness 2.9 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (20)

1 of 2
1 of 2
Add your review...
May 5, 2020
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A+

This class is one of those classes you hear about only in myths. A class that not only emotionally scars you, brings you to your knees, and thoroughly dissuades you from ever uttering the word "laser" out loud in fear of incurring Jia Ming Liu's wrath, but also brings together the class with such solidarity that you might think for even a moment that the eleven weeks of 170A were worth it. And then Chee Wei smites you with an exam that is undoable without very specific equations that cannot be derived from first principles.

As for the reviews for this class that came before mine: I have never seen such false claims that ended up being truer than you'd like to think. It really becomes apparent halfway through the class after the midterm that the reviews weren't full of shit--they were just small pieces of the puzzle that is 170A with Chee Wei Wong.

The book is confusing. Written by Jia Ming Liu, the textbook is a mess. It has the formulas, yes, but the sheer quantity of them will overwhelm anyone going through the entire book in one quarter. One quarter is not enough time to go through 11 chapters--but Chee Wei managed to cram it all down our throats. Some concepts will be referenced without further proof or explanation without any intuitive backing, some concepts will be used time and time again without any real explanation (like why the beam waist area is what it is), and some concepts you will find nowhere online. The only way you'll manage to see these topics again is if you read Photonic Devices, also by Jia Ming Liu. I found that doing the homework and studying the material, there were absolutely no resources I could find online. Photonics is just absent from all my searches. I had to rely on only the book, the lectures, and the TA, but I came to find that even that wasn't enough.

The homework for this class was extremely light compared to other classes. It was anywhere between 2-4 problems, most of which you could find examples for in the chapter. The TA will go over the first question with you during the discussion section, so most of the time you'll only have 2-3 problems to do on your own.

The classroom setting is bleak. Sitting in those desks listening to Chee Wei drone on and on about the "simplicity" of coupling, lasers, waveguides, etc. is about as dry as you'd expect it to be when there's little to no substance beneath the poetry being waxed. You will be sitting there for 2 hours, hurriedly writing down Chee Wei's notes (he uses a chalkboard), wondering what the superscript of his exponential may be and never receiving a solid answer. His graphs and diagrams are actually pretty awesome and informative. Pay attention to his diagrams. Go to the book for equations; it's more likely they'll be written correctly there.

A word of consideration: Go to the class for intuition or if you're a masochist. Read the book and tattoo the equations on your body if you hope to pass the class.

Now, the part everyone's been waiting for: the exams.

How are the exams? They are a testament to how well you can memorize and regurgitate equations seen throughout the class, your homework, and the topics not covered in the lecture but definitely covered in the book (with very little detail). Chee Wei spent the majority of the class lecturing about concepts. What he did not go over was problem solving. With homework described as maybe 3 questions a week, one of which being done for you, it's no surprise that everyone tanked the midterm. The name of the game was "Who has written down all of the necessary equations and examples in the book?" The average was a rough ~60/100. The highest score was a natural 80. Between you and me, that guy must've written down the exact example needed to solve the question everyone missed. Chee Wei later scaled the exam down, but it didn't matter how much you studied or thought you knew the concepts. If you didn't have the exact equations you needed, or have seen the EXACT problem in the book, you would've gotten a fat 0 on that question. Luckily, the TA and Chee Wei decided to give us credit for just writing our names down and spitting out "related" formulas, so there's that.

The final exam was online and was not proctored due to the COVID19 issue. It was open-book (partially because the entire class rioted following the midterm and kept grovelling to the TA and Chee Wei to do something about our despair, and partially because Chee Wei isn't the madman we thought him to be by the end of the class). It was nowhere near as difficult as the midterm because of this. You still would've needed to study and pay close attention to his lectures, but at least the factor of not having the equations in reach was filtered out.

I ended up getting a pretty decent grade in the class relative to my classmates, which is probably why I got an A+. He does curve, apparently, no matter what the TA says about not curving.

Every single lecture after the midterm, especially those leading up to the final, was filled with our prayers to Jia Ming Liu and Chee Wei to have mercy on us. Every Friday during my discussion section, the students rioted against the helpless TA who could only watch as we spiralled into insanity, before succumbing to the same effects himself. I don't think I'll ever forget the unity of the class from the midterm onwards. It was an interesting dynamic, made possible only because 170A had driven us to the brink.

Through all the negative things I had to say, I wouldn't say that 170A was all that bad. It was a horror story come to life for a lot of the people concerned with grades and learning, but all things considered, I was able to take away some topics from the class. Not all, but some. I'd say that of the 11 chapters we covered, I have a decent understanding of half of them, a very shaky understanding in a fourth of them, and little to no qualitative understanding of the remaining. The primary concern for the students was that we would not take anything away from this class to help further our knowledge in this field, and many of my classmates have agreed that 170A with Chee Wei will not prepare you well for any other photonics-related class unless you are Jia Ming Liu's soulmate and can somehow perfectly understand his textbook without ten odd years on hand to memorize it.

If nothing else, take away from this class the friendships you make along the way. Get phone numbers. Talk to your seatmates. Get real comfy not knowing what the hell Chee Wei wants from you. Talk to Chee Wei--he's not a bad person and he can be quite nice/entertaining. It's a wild ride.

(Unless Chee Wei actually took into account our screams for deliverance despite "no previous year having this many issues" and the subsequent quarters of 170A will be filled with sunshine and rainbows.)

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
April 16, 2021
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A

As other reviews already described, this class could go 3 ways : (1) You mastered ECE 2 and are capable to understand everything by readying the book and teaching yourself (since the professor dopant know how to teach). (2) You somewhat know what's going on in the class and try to cheat your way up to end of the class. (3) You're lost as everyone else in class and don't know what going on as this class is one of the hardest core course, and you just hope for a good curve to pass the class. Overall I wont recommend this professor and I advise every ECE student to avoid him cause there are better professors for this course that are able to teach, answer your questions, and care about what they're doing.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Feb. 4, 2019
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: B+

EE 2 is supposed to be hard. Professor Wong makes EE 2 ridiculously easy.

Everything taught in this class was straight from the textbook. Lectures were a waste of time. You should go to lectures if you do not want to read the textbook.

The midterm was easy, where the median was around a 95%.

The final was extremely difficult, with the median around a 60%.

Homework is extremely light. If you do not care about learning and want an easy A, then take this class. You will get nothing out of taking this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
April 3, 2019
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: N/A

By far the most useless class I have ever taken at this school. If you do not plan on going into photons nor E&M, then this class has absolutely zero relevance to what you want to do. People take this class because it's the easiest of all the electives you could pick from.

The professor tries to cover 11 chapters in this class, which is too much material. You don't actually learn anything.

The homework is very, very light and takes only 30 minutes a week. If you took EE 2 with Professor Wong, it is 100% the same format.

The midterm had one question for each chapter. The final had one question for each chapter after the midterm material. You do get cheat sheets in the class. The problem with the exams: if you have the equations/knowledge on your cheat sheet, you'll get the question right. If you do not have the equations/knowledge, you're going to get a zero on that question.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 31, 2020
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A

This class was a wild ride from start to finish. Professor Wong is a bright professor in his field, but his teaching is a bit of a whirlwind to keep up with. Homeworks range from 2 to 4 four problems and the workload isn't bad. The textbook we used is extremely convoluted, and there is way too much material shoved into one class. Your success on tests depends on how thorough your cheat sheets are.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 13, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: N/A

Material for this class is hard but professor Wong made the class like a joke. He's lectures our useless, he basically copy and pasted each page of the textbook in his slides and read them to us on lectures. Grading for this class is 50% hws, 25% midterm and 25% final, but don't assume this makes it easier. It doesn't matter how hard you try for hws, you can't ever get full points on it because averages for all hws are around 70-75%. He's midterm and final our really similar to his practice test so you just have to make sure you understand them. Overall you don't learn anything in this class but you will get a decent grade if you do the work.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Nov. 8, 2020
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A

Taking this course before 101B was a huge mistake. 101B derives modes and waveguides, and while 170A covers them, they don’t do it from a fundamental level, which makes it extremely hard to grasp when they move on to coupling and reflectors and other stuff. I would also recommend taking 163A beforehand as well since they cover some topics much more clearly, that you end up using in photonics (like periodic structures, couplers, and resonators), and they seem to do it from a more understandable microwave perspective. Without these, I felt like I simply couldn’t understand what was going on. This gives you the best chance of understanding things without getting lost in the sauce for literally 10 weeks and getting clapped by a DBR reflector. If you only have 101A you basically just have to buckle up and just learn which equations to use regardless of their meaning, and get ready because there’s like 200 of them. Also, the textbook gives no helpful explanations of anything, so when something prof. says doesn’t make sense, you better just take it as gospel and accept it.
Professor Chee Wei is a really nice and approachable person though, it’s just that students go into his class ill prepared due to the reputation of the course and the lack of prerequisites.
I actually think this class is worth learning. Lasers are extremely interesting, and the material is a fascinating extension of 101B and 163A but without the preparation of those two classes, the class becomes extremely difficult.
If you skip those two courses, taking this course is equivalent to opening up a textbook and skipping the first 3/4ths of the book and trying to learn from there, and it’s a frustrating experience.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 21, 2021
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A

Taking this class with Professor Wong means that you are choosing to self study the material. As other people have stated, the lectures are literally the same as the book which is Donald A Neamen's Semiconductor Physics (4th edition) which he uses for this course. The slides consist of pictures taken directly from the book and what he says in the lectures, you can directly find in the book. If you are planning on taking this class, I would suggest skipping the lectures and watching Jordan Edmund's lectures on YouTube instead.

The material for this class is extremely dense and you will not be able to understand from reading the book and Professor Edmund's were much more useful in making sense of what the book was saying. I would also like to say that the material in the book is extremely intimidating as each chapter involves deriving dense equations (e.g. Chapter 2 derives the Schrodinger equation) but luckily with Professor Wong you only need to know how to apply the final equations for the homework or tests.

The workload for this class is extremely light, only slightly more than ECE1 which is a seminar with a weekly paragraph writeup. There's one homework assignment every week and there are only 3-4 book problems for each problem set. The book problems themselves are quite difficult even though the TA does the first problem in the homework set during discussion. I would expect a 70-80% average on the homework assignments as they do not give partial credit and every problem has subtle nuances that you're likely to miss. Even though the workload is light, I found this unhelpful for learning the material as practice problems were the only way to fully understand the material.

I found the midterm to be challenging and the final to be extremely challenging even though I did well on both. Both are extremely similar to the book problems. I would say the midterm/final consists of the average hard problem at the end of each chapter. From what I could tell, there is also no partial credit on questions and a silly mistake will lose you all the credit for the problem so be extremely careful in your work. The average for the midterm was 78% and the final should be around 60% although he hasn't released stats for the final.

Grading is 49% homework, 1% course survey, 25% midterm, and 25% final and there is apparently a curve for this class although it was either extremely small or people did better than expected this quarter so it was negligible. Office hours were not useful as the two times I showed up the professor was not in his zoom, however the TA was quite helpful when I emailed him several times.

As for my opinion on the course overall, I personally would still take it since the workload is very low, but for you it depends on how capable you are of self studying the material. I know taking it with a different professor would mean a much higher workload and much more difficult tests so it's really up to you as to what you want. I did find the course material somewhat useless because unless you're directly going into semiconductor production/manufacture, you'll be using none of the equations or math you learn about in a practical setting. The high level concepts are much more useful and they can be reasonably covered in an hour or two of lecture.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
April 6, 2018
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: A

It’s all about cheating! This professor ignores cheating! If you want to learn something don’t take this class. If you want a good grade and have some sort of cheating skills definitely take it.

Helpful?

1 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 14, 2019
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A

Professor Wong is without a doubt one of the most engaging and efficient lecturers I've had. I recommend you to NOT skip his lectures as they are super useful. I leave every lecture wanting to learn more about semiconductors. The TA's were spectacular as well, and they truly made use of the discussion sections. Homework was also super useful and the midterm and final both presented very good questions and thoroughly tested our knowledge of the subject. Overall, I definitely recommend everyone take Professor Wong's class and you will truly appreciate it.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A+
May 5, 2020

This class is one of those classes you hear about only in myths. A class that not only emotionally scars you, brings you to your knees, and thoroughly dissuades you from ever uttering the word "laser" out loud in fear of incurring Jia Ming Liu's wrath, but also brings together the class with such solidarity that you might think for even a moment that the eleven weeks of 170A were worth it. And then Chee Wei smites you with an exam that is undoable without very specific equations that cannot be derived from first principles.

As for the reviews for this class that came before mine: I have never seen such false claims that ended up being truer than you'd like to think. It really becomes apparent halfway through the class after the midterm that the reviews weren't full of shit--they were just small pieces of the puzzle that is 170A with Chee Wei Wong.

The book is confusing. Written by Jia Ming Liu, the textbook is a mess. It has the formulas, yes, but the sheer quantity of them will overwhelm anyone going through the entire book in one quarter. One quarter is not enough time to go through 11 chapters--but Chee Wei managed to cram it all down our throats. Some concepts will be referenced without further proof or explanation without any intuitive backing, some concepts will be used time and time again without any real explanation (like why the beam waist area is what it is), and some concepts you will find nowhere online. The only way you'll manage to see these topics again is if you read Photonic Devices, also by Jia Ming Liu. I found that doing the homework and studying the material, there were absolutely no resources I could find online. Photonics is just absent from all my searches. I had to rely on only the book, the lectures, and the TA, but I came to find that even that wasn't enough.

The homework for this class was extremely light compared to other classes. It was anywhere between 2-4 problems, most of which you could find examples for in the chapter. The TA will go over the first question with you during the discussion section, so most of the time you'll only have 2-3 problems to do on your own.

The classroom setting is bleak. Sitting in those desks listening to Chee Wei drone on and on about the "simplicity" of coupling, lasers, waveguides, etc. is about as dry as you'd expect it to be when there's little to no substance beneath the poetry being waxed. You will be sitting there for 2 hours, hurriedly writing down Chee Wei's notes (he uses a chalkboard), wondering what the superscript of his exponential may be and never receiving a solid answer. His graphs and diagrams are actually pretty awesome and informative. Pay attention to his diagrams. Go to the book for equations; it's more likely they'll be written correctly there.

A word of consideration: Go to the class for intuition or if you're a masochist. Read the book and tattoo the equations on your body if you hope to pass the class.

Now, the part everyone's been waiting for: the exams.

How are the exams? They are a testament to how well you can memorize and regurgitate equations seen throughout the class, your homework, and the topics not covered in the lecture but definitely covered in the book (with very little detail). Chee Wei spent the majority of the class lecturing about concepts. What he did not go over was problem solving. With homework described as maybe 3 questions a week, one of which being done for you, it's no surprise that everyone tanked the midterm. The name of the game was "Who has written down all of the necessary equations and examples in the book?" The average was a rough ~60/100. The highest score was a natural 80. Between you and me, that guy must've written down the exact example needed to solve the question everyone missed. Chee Wei later scaled the exam down, but it didn't matter how much you studied or thought you knew the concepts. If you didn't have the exact equations you needed, or have seen the EXACT problem in the book, you would've gotten a fat 0 on that question. Luckily, the TA and Chee Wei decided to give us credit for just writing our names down and spitting out "related" formulas, so there's that.

The final exam was online and was not proctored due to the COVID19 issue. It was open-book (partially because the entire class rioted following the midterm and kept grovelling to the TA and Chee Wei to do something about our despair, and partially because Chee Wei isn't the madman we thought him to be by the end of the class). It was nowhere near as difficult as the midterm because of this. You still would've needed to study and pay close attention to his lectures, but at least the factor of not having the equations in reach was filtered out.

I ended up getting a pretty decent grade in the class relative to my classmates, which is probably why I got an A+. He does curve, apparently, no matter what the TA says about not curving.

Every single lecture after the midterm, especially those leading up to the final, was filled with our prayers to Jia Ming Liu and Chee Wei to have mercy on us. Every Friday during my discussion section, the students rioted against the helpless TA who could only watch as we spiralled into insanity, before succumbing to the same effects himself. I don't think I'll ever forget the unity of the class from the midterm onwards. It was an interesting dynamic, made possible only because 170A had driven us to the brink.

Through all the negative things I had to say, I wouldn't say that 170A was all that bad. It was a horror story come to life for a lot of the people concerned with grades and learning, but all things considered, I was able to take away some topics from the class. Not all, but some. I'd say that of the 11 chapters we covered, I have a decent understanding of half of them, a very shaky understanding in a fourth of them, and little to no qualitative understanding of the remaining. The primary concern for the students was that we would not take anything away from this class to help further our knowledge in this field, and many of my classmates have agreed that 170A with Chee Wei will not prepare you well for any other photonics-related class unless you are Jia Ming Liu's soulmate and can somehow perfectly understand his textbook without ten odd years on hand to memorize it.

If nothing else, take away from this class the friendships you make along the way. Get phone numbers. Talk to your seatmates. Get real comfy not knowing what the hell Chee Wei wants from you. Talk to Chee Wei--he's not a bad person and he can be quite nice/entertaining. It's a wild ride.

(Unless Chee Wei actually took into account our screams for deliverance despite "no previous year having this many issues" and the subsequent quarters of 170A will be filled with sunshine and rainbows.)

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2021
Grade: A
April 16, 2021

As other reviews already described, this class could go 3 ways : (1) You mastered ECE 2 and are capable to understand everything by readying the book and teaching yourself (since the professor dopant know how to teach). (2) You somewhat know what's going on in the class and try to cheat your way up to end of the class. (3) You're lost as everyone else in class and don't know what going on as this class is one of the hardest core course, and you just hope for a good curve to pass the class. Overall I wont recommend this professor and I advise every ECE student to avoid him cause there are better professors for this course that are able to teach, answer your questions, and care about what they're doing.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: B+
Feb. 4, 2019

EE 2 is supposed to be hard. Professor Wong makes EE 2 ridiculously easy.

Everything taught in this class was straight from the textbook. Lectures were a waste of time. You should go to lectures if you do not want to read the textbook.

The midterm was easy, where the median was around a 95%.

The final was extremely difficult, with the median around a 60%.

Homework is extremely light. If you do not care about learning and want an easy A, then take this class. You will get nothing out of taking this class.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: N/A
April 3, 2019

By far the most useless class I have ever taken at this school. If you do not plan on going into photons nor E&M, then this class has absolutely zero relevance to what you want to do. People take this class because it's the easiest of all the electives you could pick from.

The professor tries to cover 11 chapters in this class, which is too much material. You don't actually learn anything.

The homework is very, very light and takes only 30 minutes a week. If you took EE 2 with Professor Wong, it is 100% the same format.

The midterm had one question for each chapter. The final had one question for each chapter after the midterm material. You do get cheat sheets in the class. The problem with the exams: if you have the equations/knowledge on your cheat sheet, you'll get the question right. If you do not have the equations/knowledge, you're going to get a zero on that question.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: N/A
March 31, 2020

This class was a wild ride from start to finish. Professor Wong is a bright professor in his field, but his teaching is a bit of a whirlwind to keep up with. Homeworks range from 2 to 4 four problems and the workload isn't bad. The textbook we used is extremely convoluted, and there is way too much material shoved into one class. Your success on tests depends on how thorough your cheat sheets are.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: N/A
June 13, 2020

Material for this class is hard but professor Wong made the class like a joke. He's lectures our useless, he basically copy and pasted each page of the textbook in his slides and read them to us on lectures. Grading for this class is 50% hws, 25% midterm and 25% final, but don't assume this makes it easier. It doesn't matter how hard you try for hws, you can't ever get full points on it because averages for all hws are around 70-75%. He's midterm and final our really similar to his practice test so you just have to make sure you understand them. Overall you don't learn anything in this class but you will get a decent grade if you do the work.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
Nov. 8, 2020

Taking this course before 101B was a huge mistake. 101B derives modes and waveguides, and while 170A covers them, they don’t do it from a fundamental level, which makes it extremely hard to grasp when they move on to coupling and reflectors and other stuff. I would also recommend taking 163A beforehand as well since they cover some topics much more clearly, that you end up using in photonics (like periodic structures, couplers, and resonators), and they seem to do it from a more understandable microwave perspective. Without these, I felt like I simply couldn’t understand what was going on. This gives you the best chance of understanding things without getting lost in the sauce for literally 10 weeks and getting clapped by a DBR reflector. If you only have 101A you basically just have to buckle up and just learn which equations to use regardless of their meaning, and get ready because there’s like 200 of them. Also, the textbook gives no helpful explanations of anything, so when something prof. says doesn’t make sense, you better just take it as gospel and accept it.
Professor Chee Wei is a really nice and approachable person though, it’s just that students go into his class ill prepared due to the reputation of the course and the lack of prerequisites.
I actually think this class is worth learning. Lasers are extremely interesting, and the material is a fascinating extension of 101B and 163A but without the preparation of those two classes, the class becomes extremely difficult.
If you skip those two courses, taking this course is equivalent to opening up a textbook and skipping the first 3/4ths of the book and trying to learn from there, and it’s a frustrating experience.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2021
Grade: A
June 21, 2021

Taking this class with Professor Wong means that you are choosing to self study the material. As other people have stated, the lectures are literally the same as the book which is Donald A Neamen's Semiconductor Physics (4th edition) which he uses for this course. The slides consist of pictures taken directly from the book and what he says in the lectures, you can directly find in the book. If you are planning on taking this class, I would suggest skipping the lectures and watching Jordan Edmund's lectures on YouTube instead.

The material for this class is extremely dense and you will not be able to understand from reading the book and Professor Edmund's were much more useful in making sense of what the book was saying. I would also like to say that the material in the book is extremely intimidating as each chapter involves deriving dense equations (e.g. Chapter 2 derives the Schrodinger equation) but luckily with Professor Wong you only need to know how to apply the final equations for the homework or tests.

The workload for this class is extremely light, only slightly more than ECE1 which is a seminar with a weekly paragraph writeup. There's one homework assignment every week and there are only 3-4 book problems for each problem set. The book problems themselves are quite difficult even though the TA does the first problem in the homework set during discussion. I would expect a 70-80% average on the homework assignments as they do not give partial credit and every problem has subtle nuances that you're likely to miss. Even though the workload is light, I found this unhelpful for learning the material as practice problems were the only way to fully understand the material.

I found the midterm to be challenging and the final to be extremely challenging even though I did well on both. Both are extremely similar to the book problems. I would say the midterm/final consists of the average hard problem at the end of each chapter. From what I could tell, there is also no partial credit on questions and a silly mistake will lose you all the credit for the problem so be extremely careful in your work. The average for the midterm was 78% and the final should be around 60% although he hasn't released stats for the final.

Grading is 49% homework, 1% course survey, 25% midterm, and 25% final and there is apparently a curve for this class although it was either extremely small or people did better than expected this quarter so it was negligible. Office hours were not useful as the two times I showed up the professor was not in his zoom, however the TA was quite helpful when I emailed him several times.

As for my opinion on the course overall, I personally would still take it since the workload is very low, but for you it depends on how capable you are of self studying the material. I know taking it with a different professor would mean a much higher workload and much more difficult tests so it's really up to you as to what you want. I did find the course material somewhat useless because unless you're directly going into semiconductor production/manufacture, you'll be using none of the equations or math you learn about in a practical setting. The high level concepts are much more useful and they can be reasonably covered in an hour or two of lecture.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 170A
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: A
April 6, 2018

It’s all about cheating! This professor ignores cheating! If you want to learn something don’t take this class. If you want a good grade and have some sort of cheating skills definitely take it.

Helpful?

1 2 Please log in to provide feedback.
EC ENGR 2
Quarter: Spring 2019
Grade: A
June 14, 2019

Professor Wong is without a doubt one of the most engaging and efficient lecturers I've had. I recommend you to NOT skip his lectures as they are super useful. I leave every lecture wanting to learn more about semiconductors. The TA's were spectacular as well, and they truly made use of the discussion sections. Homework was also super useful and the midterm and final both presented very good questions and thoroughly tested our knowledge of the subject. Overall, I definitely recommend everyone take Professor Wong's class and you will truly appreciate it.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!