Christina Bernadette Gray
Department of Architecture and Urban Design
AD
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Participation Matters
  • Would Take Again
  • Issues PTEs
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (5)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
May 4, 2017

This was a straightforward GE credit that was interesting. The professor was fair.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
July 22, 2016

I enjoyed the class and would recommend it. The lectures were good and the class wasn't too hard.

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
July 22, 2016

I recommend this class for anyone wanting to learn more about architecture but not in the architecture program. The lectures were interesting and the professor was helpful.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 29, 2016

Prof reads off sheets during lecture and is not engaging at all. TAs can grade hard so effort has to be put into reading responses. Text readings completely useless. All the tests are is memorizing a sheet they put online the week before and knowing basic knowledge about the buildings. If you can memorize basic useless years, architects, buildings and vocab, this is the class for you.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
March 21, 2016

A basic architectural history class cut at the Renaissance.

Gray's lectures are condensed versions of the textbook. Reading is a choice but if you pay attention in lecture and take care to write good notes, attend discussion weekly, and do the responses, you should be able to succeed.

What I found new was that the weekly reading responses are worth more of your grade than the midterm or final. The hardest part are the weekly readings and responses. Gray time stamps the responses so they are due Friday mornings before discussion.

Gray posts a study guide for both exams so you know which buildings to focus on memorizing. TAs were valuable in preparing for the final's essay question as the TAs provided us with practice questions that appeared on the actual final.

Overall, this class is an interesting, easy GE that isn't time-consuming.

Helpful?

3 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
May 4, 2017

This was a straightforward GE credit that was interesting. The professor was fair.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
July 22, 2016

I enjoyed the class and would recommend it. The lectures were good and the class wasn't too hard.

Helpful?

4 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
July 22, 2016

I recommend this class for anyone wanting to learn more about architecture but not in the architecture program. The lectures were interesting and the professor was helpful.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 29, 2016

Prof reads off sheets during lecture and is not engaging at all. TAs can grade hard so effort has to be put into reading responses. Text readings completely useless. All the tests are is memorizing a sheet they put online the week before and knowing basic knowledge about the buildings. If you can memorize basic useless years, architects, buildings and vocab, this is the class for you.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: N/A
March 21, 2016

A basic architectural history class cut at the Renaissance.

Gray's lectures are condensed versions of the textbook. Reading is a choice but if you pay attention in lecture and take care to write good notes, attend discussion weekly, and do the responses, you should be able to succeed.

What I found new was that the weekly reading responses are worth more of your grade than the midterm or final. The hardest part are the weekly readings and responses. Gray time stamps the responses so they are due Friday mornings before discussion.

Gray posts a study guide for both exams so you know which buildings to focus on memorizing. TAs were valuable in preparing for the final's essay question as the TAs provided us with practice questions that appeared on the actual final.

Overall, this class is an interesting, easy GE that isn't time-consuming.

Helpful?

3 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.5
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (3)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (3)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (4)
  • Participation Matters
    (4)
  • Would Take Again
    (3)
  • Issues PTEs
    (3)
  • Needs Textbook
    (3)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (3)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!