Honestly... she's probably the best you're going to get for 113. Her curve is set so that median is a high B+, pushing to an A-.

But the way she runs her classes is problematic. Her examples and lecture notes are too simple, and are designed to teach you definitions and to present formulas to solve questions with (e.g. determining if a system is linear, TI, casual, stable). The homeworks and discussion sections are designed with similar principles, but much harder.

Then you realize the goddamn midterms are EVEN HARDER, but on top of that, a large portion will usually involve proving some crazyass property and the questions related to homework and discussions make up maybe only 30% of the exam. And to nobody's surprise, the class got absolutely dumpstered.

So on the final, the focus was on stuff similar to homework questions, which is good! But the test is now 36. FUCKING. PAGES. Just endless questions (i.e. endless torture). So that's already bad design. But on top of that, because of her grading scheme, and the fact that the midterm averages were so low and unrelated to the design of her final exam, it made me realize that I totally didn't need to even take any of the midterms. That's not a good outlook on the class, just fyi.

Anyway she has an extra credit project. Do it lol.

This class, and the prof frankly, were a mess from start to finish. The book that the entire class is based on is from the 70's and is horrible at explaining the concepts taught in class, and the professor does the same along with it. Expectations for the class are extremely vague, with lessons barely correlating with any of the exams or homework. Additionally, there are two group projects that you are required to work on, and the first project was horribly explained and it took over a week to get clarification answers, with the project taking an excessive amount of man-hours with no clarity on how grading worked. Finally, as stated earlier, the homework and exams had almost nothing to do with what was taught in class, often asking very obscure questions that would often take much longer to decipher than to answer.
Summary: The book, lectures, assignments, and the class as a whole are extremely unorganized and I would recommend avoiding this class unless you have a good understanding of graph theroy previously

People have polarized opinions about this class, possibly due to the fact that the contents were quite "quirky." The homework problems were mostly proof-based, but the exam problems geared more towards application, so most students were surprised and had a hard time decipher what those problems meant. Overall, I feel like the lectures were well-explained, and the professor was super nice during office hours. What I liked the most about this class were the open ended projects that allowed us to apply the theoretical concepts on real-world problems. Even though the first project was a mess due to some floppy wordings, the overall experience was enjoyable. My only complaint was about the TA, who seldom answered questions, and was super lazy. I would recommend taking this class with this professor, but just be aware of who your TA is.

I loved this class! She's a great lecturer who explains clearly and is very willing to answer questions/repeat concepts. Her tests were interesting and very fair. Though the final exam was significantly harder than the midterm, I suspect the curving was generous for the final grades. The homework was also interesting and short with the exception of the first couple Matlab assignments, but even these were reasonable. Not to mention she has a very nice, almost motherly personality! I honestly would take her just for her personality, but the wonderfully balanced homework and tests are the icing on the cake!

Take her! If not for this class, then for something else, because I bet she'll be great for other courses, too. (And from what I heard, she has been!)

Professor teaches the concept very well intuitively no doubt about it, tests are difficult, Assigments are difficult but the grades are curved, I personally felt that sometime having test which are relatively easier can make you fall in love with subject, if not subconciously we feel, how much ever you know its hard to score in test because concepts covered in class and discussion class problems can help in solving assigments but exams will be completely out of these two. If you are someone new to LP , then they need to put in lot of effort. Sildes are great source of notes and you do not need any text book apart from that. solving statment problems and how to approach should be thought so that we can go above and beyond, if not we will still be trying how to approach and there is no scope for goingbeyond, it seems like I hate the subject to be honest the subject is simple great if you want to understand how optimization works.

One of my favorite profs in EE. Material is very well explained, homeworks are challenging (but doable), and exams are quite hard but the curve helps significantly.

Prep for exams by focusing on lecture review, and for the final make sure to study lots of different max flow/min cut problem variants.

Fragouli is such a good professor by EE standards it's honestly confusing.

This was a challenging class without having taken some of the lower divs that offer a primer on some of the topics. The class moved fairly quickly. Homeworks generally take a long time if you are doing them by yourself. I thought it was necessary to go to lecture because the notes helped a lot on the problem sets. Her lectures follow a logical progression through the topics. Overall a positive experience I definitely learned something in the process.

This is essentially a math class so the easiness/difficulty depends on your ability to grasp and apply new math concepts quickly. That being said, Ms. Fragouli is very good lecturer as every class had a logical and organized progression of topics. As long as you attend most lectures, take good notes, and do the homeworks, you should have no problems passing this class. She also essentially wrote everything that we had to learn on the board (no books needed). That being said, getting an A might be not be so easy. Her exams are math heavy in the sense that there's usually proving involved.

Overall, great lecturer, not hard to pass, but don't expect an easy A.

Professor Fragouli's lecture is very clear and explanatory. The lecture is mainly composed of proofs so her class demands a good background in calculus. From homework and exams point of view, there is a little gap between lecture and homework, that by mean the homework and exams are very tough compared to lectures; however, understanding the lecture is very vital to do the homework and the exam so if you have anything you do not understand better to ask in the class she is very welcome answering questions. Doing project is very helpful to boost your grade since it is a bonus. As overall, professor Fragouli's class is very rewarding at the end of the quarter if you have been working hard.

Fragouli is pretty straightforward with her teaching style and the material she covers. Although there can be some tricky questions, there's nothing unfair about her tests or the class in general.