Daniel H Lowenstein
Department of Honors Collegium
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
36.4%
30.3%
24.2%
18.2%
12.1%
6.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 23, 2010

He is one of the most intellectual and well-read professors I have had the privilege of meeting at UCLA. His understanding of American Political Thought astounds me, especially since his field of expertise is Election Law. Professor Lowenstein is a warm, kind-hearted, fair, and confrontational instructor and really cares about learning. Seriously, though, imagine taking a Ivy-League styled seminar at the undergraduate level from a Postgraduate scholar, who expects excellence from his students. Professor Lowenstein genuinely cares about his students actually learning something meaningful, not solely limited to the subject matter.
The readings were reasonable in terms of time and effort needed, and in terms of quality, were magnificent. The course consisted of three papers, of which he applied his own grading system he has used in the Law School. This course is far from an easy A course, which shouldn't matter. If you want to get your tuition's worth, take this class. In fact take all the classes offered by him in CLAFI. I promise you, you won't regret it. I sure don't.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 3, 2010

The class readings were exceptional. My only qualm with the class was that we didn't have the opportunity to discuss the text more amongst ourselves (students). Professor Lowenstein is an exceptionally knowledgeable professor but he would tend to hijack the conversation. I can't complain too much, though, because he certainly took it easy on us... only three 4-5 page papers for the class (no mid-term or final), and he was a fair grader (maybe even too easy, a lot of us procrastinated to the last minute on our first paper and still got good grades).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 23, 2010

He is one of the most intellectual and well-read professors I have had the privilege of meeting at UCLA. His understanding of American Political Thought astounds me, especially since his field of expertise is Election Law. Professor Lowenstein is a warm, kind-hearted, fair, and confrontational instructor and really cares about learning. Seriously, though, imagine taking a Ivy-League styled seminar at the undergraduate level from a Postgraduate scholar, who expects excellence from his students. Professor Lowenstein genuinely cares about his students actually learning something meaningful, not solely limited to the subject matter.
The readings were reasonable in terms of time and effort needed, and in terms of quality, were magnificent. The course consisted of three papers, of which he applied his own grading system he has used in the Law School. This course is far from an easy A course, which shouldn't matter. If you want to get your tuition's worth, take this class. In fact take all the classes offered by him in CLAFI. I promise you, you won't regret it. I sure don't.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 3, 2010

The class readings were exceptional. My only qualm with the class was that we didn't have the opportunity to discuss the text more amongst ourselves (students). Professor Lowenstein is an exceptionally knowledgeable professor but he would tend to hijack the conversation. I can't complain too much, though, because he certainly took it easy on us... only three 4-5 page papers for the class (no mid-term or final), and he was a fair grader (maybe even too easy, a lot of us procrastinated to the last minute on our first paper and still got good grades).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!