Please if I can leave you with one piece of advice is DO NOT take Professor Nathanson while at UCLA. Whether you're an Econ major or not, DO NOT take this Professor. I've been fortunate to have some really incredible Professors at UCLA, but this man should not be teaching. He has a career in Entrepreneurship, but he should not be teaching. The concepts are not explained at all, his tests are incredibly unfair (though he'll argue with you that they are) and he constantly insults his students when they ask questions that are considered "basic" or "stupid" according to him.

He took a poll at the beginning of this quarter to see what students were in his class. 75 out of 280 students were Econ majors. Professor Nathanson explained that the "majority" of the class was therefore Econ and he would teach more advanced topics and not clarify basic accounting principles because the class was "mostly Econ" despite the majority of the class being humanities and science majors with no Entrepreneurship or Accounting experience.

The midterm was not at all what he prepared us for. I studied for 2 weeks all of the in-depth terms that were in the weekly chapter assessments and the exam contained none of those concepts. The average on the midterm was a 60%, but the Professor argued with those who tried to ask questions by saying that the exam was "completely fair." Professor Nathanson also insulted all the students who needed scratch paper on the test, saying that the math was simple and those who needed scratch paper were clearly unprepared for the class and needed to go back to reviewing simple math.

If you can avoid Professor Nathanson in your time at UCLA, I would plead with you to do so. His class made many of his students insecure about their intelligence, frustrated about their grade, and hopeless with the lack of help and poor lectures. In my time at UCLA, I've never ever left a negative review, nor have I EVER contacted the department on behalf of a Professor. However, this Professor should not be teaching at UCLA.

Absolutely waste of time of a class and terrible professor. I am truly not exaggerating when I say that this class was completely useless and taught me absolutely nothing of relevance to business or entrepreneurship. There were some financial concepts such as financial statements, return on investment, and accounting but the professor did not teach those well at all, and I only understood these concepts having taken accounting courses in the past such as Mgmt 1A and B.

What added to the frustration was that this class was not only useless, but also extremely, unnecessarily expensive: we were forced to buy a $100 textbook that was completely garbage teaching us facts like "the preferred method of contact for Gen X is email and that the disadvantages of starting your own business is time commitment issues and that your company will cease to exist if you die". We were forced to buy $36 worth of material from this Zoom platform where an AI grades our discussion...$12/case study to hop on a 1 hour Zoom call filled with bugs and the Professor was an ADVISOR to the company. I'm pretty sure that is a conflict of interest, and I know that past year classes have also been used as the "beta testers" for this product and also complained, but the Professor sent out a long email calling out this anonymous reddit poster who posted about the issue "weak and timid". The professor's excuse in the email was that it was to convey the entrepreneurial concept of finding your market's willingness to pay...but that is complete bullshit because he could have made the product free and surveyed the class, or done anything. It just seems like the sleeziest cash grab to me, and I should not feel this way at an institution like UCLA.

This class was truly awful, and every Wednesday I would have to haul ass to listen to 3 hours of completely common sense, zero substance rambling by the professor who read off slides. I was taught nothing, NOTHING of value and the tests were filled with memorization based questions that you will never need in your life such as "In class the professor mentioned the 3 C's of management, what are they?" apparently Commitment, Credibility, and smt else I am not remembering. I only took this class because my class load was tough (taking Econ 104 and a CS upper div) but I'd rather have added a third class that was challenging and tough but intellectually stimulating than wasting my life taking this class that still required me to spend time memorizing absurd and useless details. I feel like the Bruinwalk reviews are somewhat negative, but nothing conveyed the extent of how goddamn awful and useless this class is. I'm also speaking as someone who scored 100% after the curve on the midterm if that adds credibility to my review and shows I am not stating this out of spite because of a bad grade or smt. This is BY FAR the worst class I have ever taken at UCLA, I am appalled that it exists.

Overall, this class was okay. I ended with a B+ after getting a C on my midterm and a B+ on the final so I can't complain. My advice to you for this class would be to study the textbook for the final and midterm (not so much on the midterm). There are also a lot of accounting concepts on the exams, so try to memorize those. I had to pay quite a bit for the class, but luckily I was able to get a refund on breakout learning because it glitched out a lot. Class can be time-consuming but manageable. Guest speakers are great. Attendance is important, but I got away with skipping one or two classes or leaving midway (I just got a friend in the class to send me the attendance code). I feel like if I had tried and studied a bit harder, I could have gotten an A, so its definitely possible, but with some work.

Lectures are super long, and a couple were incredibly boring, but a lot of them include a guest speaker and those are typically interesting. The class is easier than people say, just do all the homework, it's pretty much completion based, attend the lectures (they're mandatory), and study the textbook and slides.

Professor Nathanson is literally horrible. As an Econ major I really struggled in his class. He gave no help and was really rude to all of his students. Also all the case studies had typos in it that he just ignored and the TAs continuously changed the syllabus every week so you never knew what you were supposed to do.

I honestly think that the other reviews on this page are WAY too harsh. The professor absolutely taught us important concepts. He told us exactly how to study for the exams. Sure, some of the questions were a little nit-picky and definitely require some memorization of the concepts, but I'm not sure what's really wrong with that. The comments I had read on bruinwalk prompted me to study way more intensely than I normally do, but I guess it paid off because I did fine on the exams.

The class was fairly expensive but when people complained, the professor said we could get our money back (except for the textbook cost but like textbooks are a part of college?) I honestly feel like some of these reviews are exaggerating and people just want to find something to complain about. The class met once a week for 3 hours and the homework was so manageable. It had a way lighter workload than the other courses I took that quarter.

This was also the first course I took relating to econ, accounting, or business anything and I got an A+. Hope this eases some nerves for students who don't have a choice but to take this class. I actually enjoyed it a ton!

I'd say the other reviews blow Dan's behavior way out of proportion. He's overall a great guy that's always willing to chat and cares for his student's education. Realistically I hadn't put in significant effort and came out with an A. Just study for the midterm and final using the smartbook recharge and you'll be more than fine.

Also for those claiming it was unfair, he literally decided that if you did better on the final than the midterm it would replace your grade for it, although it wasn't in the syllabus originally. Overall extremely kind and accommodating.

Overall, this class is ok. This is my first management class, so I'm not sure how it compares to others. Most of this class is based on completion, so take that as you will. Everyone did horribly on the midterm, with an average of 69%. This was because the entire thing was based off of the textbook, like 10 chapters, that we did not discuss at all in class, and the professor assured us that the midterm would focus mostly on "lecture and application," so we had no idea what to expect. Further, I lost a lot of points because all of the multiple choice questions were "select all that apply." Professor Nathanson said he had "no idea why everyone did so horribly." That being said, he did adjust the final exam to be more explicit to what was going to be on it as well as less "select all that apply."So really he did respond to our feedback despite at first being offended by it. Because everyone did so badly, he decided to use the final for both the midterm and the final grade if you did better, although he was really unclear on that policy and many people were confused.

The class itself is somewhat interesting, but if you're not into Shark Tank, it will probably feel useless. I also took it when the time was 8:30 am for 3 hours, and attendance is mandatory and he is strict about timestamps, so take that into account.

This was an easy class. But you probably won't learn much out of it. Instead of learning some technical stuff, you would learn some really broad business concepts focusing on entrepreneurship. You would probably be motivated to start a business yourself after seeing those successful guys earning crazy money. But that's it, you wouldn't learn how exactly to start a business, which seems like an MBA thing. Anyway, as long as you submit all your homework and attend all lectures, and study a little bit for the exams, an A for this class isn't unattainable.

Conclusion: don't take this class if you don't really have a passion in entrepreneurship.
Time - Though the contents in class were fun, I would not recommend taking this class. The class is once per week from 8:30 to 11:15 and the professor requires attendance for every single lecture. If you miss one lecture, you'll have to write a 3 page paper on what he taught that week.... I personally hate 3 hour lectures, especially this one is in the morning.
Class content - We read about cases and analyzed them in class but these were not the main questions in tests. Prof invited random guest speakers (A lot are entrepreneurs but most of them were just Anderson students who just started their business, I dont really think they know much about real world entrepreneurship ..... ) and tested us on details that they've mentioned.
Readings - We were required to read around 3 chapters of textbook (weekly homework also include doing questions in chapters) per week and the tests were heavily based on the readings. Prof never talked about materials in the book!
Grading - Also, I really dont like how the TAs and the professor kept changing things throughout the quarter. The grading scheme was unclear. As we had a 60% average on our midterms, the TAs said they'll curve the grades but they never did. Later, professor said if you do better in finals, final exam grade can replace midterm grades. It was so confusing. The case responses were mainly graded based on completion, but for the airbnb case, they graded us based on response quality. We were required to do the case in random group within one week (very hard to find a common meeting time, which was required).
Tests & Homework - The questions in the exams were super tricky, with a lot of questions that have multiple answers. Workload is super big (at least for me). We not only need to read the textbook, complete textbook questions, but also need to read cases and answer case questions, watch Udacity videos(some online course on entrepreneruship), watch additional videos, do group projects, and we have to write a 3-5 page single spaced paper.
Overall, I would say I put much effort in this class and enjoyed the cases but I constantly regret about taking this class throughout the quarter (thought about dropping but the sunken cost was too high since I've already did a lot of work :)))) ).