David Kim
Department of European Languages and Transcultural Studies
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
40.4%
33.7%
26.9%
20.2%
13.5%
6.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 7, 2026

This was a challenging course loaded with philosophical thinking. All the readings were philosophical content written by famous thinkers, such as Kant. The professor himself did an alright job explaining them, yet to understand philosophy, one has to think in a way that's obscure to begin with. I did not like the class material very much – because I am not a fan of philosophy – however, my TA was very nice to all of us. This made sections quite enjoyable and helpful to complement the confusion I felt from lectures. The midterms were multiple-choice questions + short and long essays. They were hard at first glance, but if you truly understood the content and can write clearly, you will be on track to get an A. The lecture composed of 50-60 students and is very much like a discussion. The professor invites students to contribute ideas, but it's not mandtatory to raise your hand for participation points. So if talking in class is your cup of tea, this would be fun.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
Jan. 7, 2026

This was a challenging course loaded with philosophical thinking. All the readings were philosophical content written by famous thinkers, such as Kant. The professor himself did an alright job explaining them, yet to understand philosophy, one has to think in a way that's obscure to begin with. I did not like the class material very much – because I am not a fan of philosophy – however, my TA was very nice to all of us. This made sections quite enjoyable and helpful to complement the confusion I felt from lectures. The midterms were multiple-choice questions + short and long essays. They were hard at first glance, but if you truly understood the content and can write clearly, you will be on track to get an A. The lecture composed of 50-60 students and is very much like a discussion. The professor invites students to contribute ideas, but it's not mandtatory to raise your hand for participation points. So if talking in class is your cup of tea, this would be fun.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!