David MacFadyen
Department of Comparative Literature
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
38.3%
31.9%
25.5%
19.1%
12.8%
6.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 13, 2020

Didn't go to lecture after week 4, didn't do any readings. Participation in discussion is 40% of grade. 60% is 3 3 page essays that your TA edits for you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 3, 2020

Extremely easy class if you are into literature and the humanities. We studied the Bible (Old Testament), Epic of Gilgamesh, ancient Chinese and Roman poetry, all of which was very interesting. Your grade is entirely dependent upon section participation and 3 essays throughout the quarter. Each essay is no more than 3 pages. Satisfies Writing II requirement which is a plus.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A-
Sept. 20, 2019

Your grade in this class relies entirely on your TA, so go to discussion. Professor Macfayden is a nice person and funny, but his lectures felt really pointless. I stopped going after a while and only attended discussion which nobody should do but I did anyways. I did feel a little bad but I don't recall learning a single thing across all his lectures I did attend. My TA was super nice but a huge stickler for grammar and convention. She didn't like the way I write (because it sucks) so I got points taken off for it. That said, she tells you exactly what she wants changed in your rough draft so there's no reason why you shouldn't get a higher grade than I did.

Grades are decided entirely by three three page essays. You turn in a rough draft and get advice from it before you turn in the final copy. The readings were a little long but you don't actually have to read the whole thing if you are good at improv in discussion, as participation matters for your grade.

In general, it was a fine GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 13, 2020

Didn't go to lecture after week 4, didn't do any readings. Participation in discussion is 40% of grade. 60% is 3 3 page essays that your TA edits for you.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 3, 2020

Extremely easy class if you are into literature and the humanities. We studied the Bible (Old Testament), Epic of Gilgamesh, ancient Chinese and Roman poetry, all of which was very interesting. Your grade is entirely dependent upon section participation and 3 essays throughout the quarter. Each essay is no more than 3 pages. Satisfies Writing II requirement which is a plus.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A-
Sept. 20, 2019

Your grade in this class relies entirely on your TA, so go to discussion. Professor Macfayden is a nice person and funny, but his lectures felt really pointless. I stopped going after a while and only attended discussion which nobody should do but I did anyways. I did feel a little bad but I don't recall learning a single thing across all his lectures I did attend. My TA was super nice but a huge stickler for grammar and convention. She didn't like the way I write (because it sucks) so I got points taken off for it. That said, she tells you exactly what she wants changed in your rough draft so there's no reason why you shouldn't get a higher grade than I did.

Grades are decided entirely by three three page essays. You turn in a rough draft and get advice from it before you turn in the final copy. The readings were a little long but you don't actually have to read the whole thing if you are good at improv in discussion, as participation matters for your grade.

In general, it was a fine GE.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!