David Weisbart
Department of Mathematics
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
49.5%
41.3%
33.0%
24.8%
16.5%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2015
Grade: A-
May 5, 2016

Absolutely horrendous. Lectures are a joke and not prepared at all. Almost everyone gets an A because he gives out a practice midterm that is similar to the test, but you inherently don't feel like you're learning anything at all along the way. Great to see this guy gone from UCLA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2014
Grade: A+
April 4, 2016

垃圾

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2015

I am sad to see Dave leave. He was a great professor who inspired students to learn for the sake of furthering one's self, not to learn to get good grades and be a bitch to college/your GPA. If more professors were like him, the school would be a better place especially for south campus classes. Great man, well progressed lectures, and such a cool and awesome dude.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 12, 2015

I have no idea why so many people praise him.

I have to say he is 100% a nice guy and he is very concerned with his students' learning, but he cannot teach well. That is a fact.

1. His lectures are extremely unorganized. He doesn't have a clear schedule and he never uses notes to have some easy numbers to work with. So many times, the class becomes an over-complicated algebra class s.

2. He does not usually talk about definitions. So the outcome is: after a whole class, you had no idea about what he talked about.

3. He covers materials that are not required and does not cover materials on Math Department's syllabus.

e.g. He skips Chapter 2.2 and the whole Chapter 8, but covers 115A material: vector space and inner products.

So after this class, everyone gets an A, but learns little.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2015
Grade: A-
May 5, 2016

Absolutely horrendous. Lectures are a joke and not prepared at all. Almost everyone gets an A because he gives out a practice midterm that is similar to the test, but you inherently don't feel like you're learning anything at all along the way. Great to see this guy gone from UCLA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2014
Grade: A+
April 4, 2016

垃圾

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 14, 2015

I am sad to see Dave leave. He was a great professor who inspired students to learn for the sake of furthering one's self, not to learn to get good grades and be a bitch to college/your GPA. If more professors were like him, the school would be a better place especially for south campus classes. Great man, well progressed lectures, and such a cool and awesome dude.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 12, 2015

I have no idea why so many people praise him.

I have to say he is 100% a nice guy and he is very concerned with his students' learning, but he cannot teach well. That is a fact.

1. His lectures are extremely unorganized. He doesn't have a clear schedule and he never uses notes to have some easy numbers to work with. So many times, the class becomes an over-complicated algebra class s.

2. He does not usually talk about definitions. So the outcome is: after a whole class, you had no idea about what he talked about.

3. He covers materials that are not required and does not cover materials on Math Department's syllabus.

e.g. He skips Chapter 2.2 and the whole Chapter 8, but covers 115A material: vector space and inner products.

So after this class, everyone gets an A, but learns little.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!