Edward Young
Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Is Podcasted
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Would Take Again
  • Issues PTEs

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A+
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 24, 2020

This review is for EPSSCI 106 (Physical Geochem) w Prof Young:
I took this class as a non-EPSS major, with fairly weak background in math & physics. There was some linear algebra, and quite a bit of conceptual calculus and derivations, but it was not the focus. If a non-physical science background is a big concern in taking this class, I'd say still go for it, it will be a little difficult but not impossible.

There was no real grade breakdown, the professor appears to have given grades for effort so just turn in the ~4 problem sets, midterm and final with your best attempt and you'd be set.

The prof posts pre-class notes that he makes himself (extremely useful for me as it succinctly explains key concepts and thought process in calculations exactly as he covers in class) and relevant materials e.g. textbook chapters. Bruincast and lecture notes are available as well. There is a lot of digestion to do per class as compared to many others I've taken, but that might be because I personally found it challenging to make sense of the more conceptual material. Definitely recommend first making detailed notes and then summarizing the key points of each lecture (i.e. final derivation, layman explanations for terms and objectives) and regularly use the summary to quickly 'relearn' and refresh your grasp on things.

The professor is very clear and detail-orientated, which I appreciated a lot. He defines every variable, doesn't assume you have prior knowledge of things (as the material is fundamental and it would be easy to have misconceptions or slips of mind), regularly reminds you what is going on in the middle of derivations (it's easy to lose track), and covers content in a systematic and logical manner. He also goes through examples which is extremely helpful because that's where I feel the pieces clicking together and figure out how to work through problems. Also empathetic and understanding, and accommodates for students.

In general, the class was pretty cool as the material was very fundamental and conceptual. I felt that it gave me a more solid understanding of the properties of matter, knowing what are all the variables that go into calculations and adjusted approximations for certain measurements and being able to apply it to some extent on real-life systems. I believe there is considerable overlap between this class and CHEM 110A, so taking either first would be helpful for the other in future (I'll be taking 110A after this which might make it less painful).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A+
June 24, 2020

This review is for EPSSCI 106 (Physical Geochem) w Prof Young:
I took this class as a non-EPSS major, with fairly weak background in math & physics. There was some linear algebra, and quite a bit of conceptual calculus and derivations, but it was not the focus. If a non-physical science background is a big concern in taking this class, I'd say still go for it, it will be a little difficult but not impossible.

There was no real grade breakdown, the professor appears to have given grades for effort so just turn in the ~4 problem sets, midterm and final with your best attempt and you'd be set.

The prof posts pre-class notes that he makes himself (extremely useful for me as it succinctly explains key concepts and thought process in calculations exactly as he covers in class) and relevant materials e.g. textbook chapters. Bruincast and lecture notes are available as well. There is a lot of digestion to do per class as compared to many others I've taken, but that might be because I personally found it challenging to make sense of the more conceptual material. Definitely recommend first making detailed notes and then summarizing the key points of each lecture (i.e. final derivation, layman explanations for terms and objectives) and regularly use the summary to quickly 'relearn' and refresh your grasp on things.

The professor is very clear and detail-orientated, which I appreciated a lot. He defines every variable, doesn't assume you have prior knowledge of things (as the material is fundamental and it would be easy to have misconceptions or slips of mind), regularly reminds you what is going on in the middle of derivations (it's easy to lose track), and covers content in a systematic and logical manner. He also goes through examples which is extremely helpful because that's where I feel the pieces clicking together and figure out how to work through problems. Also empathetic and understanding, and accommodates for students.

In general, the class was pretty cool as the material was very fundamental and conceptual. I felt that it gave me a more solid understanding of the properties of matter, knowing what are all the variables that go into calculations and adjusted approximations for certain measurements and being able to apply it to some extent on real-life systems. I believe there is considerable overlap between this class and CHEM 110A, so taking either first would be helpful for the other in future (I'll be taking 110A after this which might make it less painful).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Is Podcasted
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
  • Issues PTEs
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!