Professor

Elizabeth West

AD
2.4
Overall Ratings
Based on 35 Users
Easiness 1.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 2.7 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (35)

3 of 3
3 of 3
Add your review...
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Aug. 26, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: C+

Taken spring quarter 2020, apparently her first quarter teaching at UCLA. I had no prior advanced physics experience.
I don't know how much her teaching style will change since Spring was her first (online) quarter. She was one of the most accommodating professors online-wise: recording & posting all of her lectures, not requiring any mandatory attendance, creating a survey prior to class starting to learn of all of our circumstances and being semi-flexible with exams (at least at the end: the first midterm was a timed 2-3 hour exam and the formatting was stressful, but she became more lenient over time. The final was written 24 hr portion + 45 min (short) timed online portion to curb cheaters, since dumb@sses posted the midterm II on Chegg while it was live). Exams were challenging for sure-arguably in the right ways- but it felt like the practice exams did not always reflect what would be on the exams. Her exam questions were pretty much deviations of "standard" Physics problems: pulleys, rollercoasters, rotation, frames of reference, etc. with a twist.

She was not as accommodating with the rise of BLM protests, while almost most other professors were, so take that as you will.

Office hours: She offers generous office hours. Will answer any questions.

KUDU: The class textbook was a good foundational tool, but not exceptional by any means. It was pretty buggy. I found that the hard-to-follow proofs for derivations in the book were compensated and cleared up by West in the lecture, which I appreciated.

As for teaching, she was one of the best professors I've had. I found her lectures to be a breath of fresh air; compared to the traditional chalkboard lecturer, she made her slides and notes pretty clear and updated. I think if you are taking this class as just a requirement, the work may seem like overkill, but I liked how in-depth she went with the explanations of each proof and providing examples. This is a 5 unit class, compared to most STEM lower divs already being 4 units.

By the latter half of the course, she was unclear about the curve and made things more complicated than they needed to be. I get that she was new and her curve is unique, but this quarter was not one to experiment and test and confuse students.

I do not think she understood the Math requisites for this class, or perhaps Physics 1A disregards it as a course, but she did introduce advanced math topics (like integration/32B-worthy material). It was not too difficult but it is good (not necessary) to try to take 32A before this course since the first half of both courses are introducing vectors.

Overall, I am not sure if I would take this class again. Her accessibility and excellence as a professor were offset by the inconsistency of the course syllabus near the end of the course along with her patronizing commentary towards world events.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 22, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: B

First off, I believe this was the first class West ever taught as she does research (I think?) and is not yet a true professor, so we were her guinea pig class. Yayyyyy. I went into this class with some experience from taking AP Physics 1 and AP Physics C in high school (A in both classes although I got 2's on both AP tests). I sat in lecture (online Zoom) a few times but ended up skipping most because they were slow and I was uninterested in watching West derive equations. I felt I new the class material well enough because I was able to learn whatever I was missing through the (on average) weekly assigned problems on Kudu. Because we used Kudu, there was no textbook needed for this class. However, while the Kudu homework problems were at a difficulty of my high school physics tests, the two Midterms and Final were almost at a difficulty level of the AP tests. Hence I did not do very well lol. The professor was nice but unwilling to explicitly tell us she'd make the class easier due to the protests and Covid-19, so many students (including me) felt very stressed and disliked her due to her unsympathetic responses to us. I ended up going into the final with what I believed was a C or C- with no curve. Ended up working 15+ hours on the 24 hour final in a desperate attempt to pass the class. When I got my final exam grade back, without a curve I believe it pushed me up to a C+ about .5 percent away from a B-. But lucky for me, West curved this class so I ended with a final grade of a B. Many people in their moment of stress going into the final decided to drop this class or switch to pass/no pass, but I did not because I stubbornly did not care and was ready to take the L. Please don't worry if you have this professor. While Physics 1A is a hard class regardless of professor, and there are definitely professors easier than West, by no means does she make this class impossible. I'd say overall this class was average in difficulty in my experience. (For reference, I'm a mechanical engineering major, had to take the 20 series chem. Now THOSE were hard for me haha).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
June 9, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: N/A

Most of the class was spent going over formulas and how to derive them. I found this pretty useless because our "textbook" was decent at explaining this. I felt the class would have been better if she dedicated more time to doing relevant examples instead of focusing on the formulas. Our textbook was on Kudu. There were between 15 and 20 questions assigned each week and you have two attempts for the multiple choice and four for the fill-in questions. Some of the questions were quite challenging. The study materials she gave for the midterms and final were nothing like the actual tests. The midterm consisted of between 4 and 7 questions each with multiple parts. They were supposedly able to be completed in around 2 hours, but that was not the case for most of the class. Most students spent more than 5 hours or more on the exams. The exams were pretty challenging, and were almost nothing like the problems we had done in class or for homework. The only thing that I found helpful was the discussion. Most of the time, he would do examples to questions similar to things you would find on the tests. Now for the final. This one of the craziest experiences that I've had in a class. With the protests going on, most professors decided to opt for a no harm final or provide some other form of accommodation for the class. Dr. West's decision was to change the weight of the final by 10% depending on how you performed (final was worth more if you did better than on the midterms). Even after several emails from not only the students, but the Academic Senate as well the department chair, she would not budge on her decision. This was very frustrating, especially after all my other professors had put their students well being as the priority. The only reason she did this was because she felt we hadn't shown her that we knew the material, which doesn't even make any sense. She also began voicing her opinions about the protests, and almost criticized students who wanted to participate in the protests, which I thought was out of line. I know this class is meant to be hard, but the situations that arose could have been handled in a much better manner.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: C+
Aug. 26, 2020

Taken spring quarter 2020, apparently her first quarter teaching at UCLA. I had no prior advanced physics experience.
I don't know how much her teaching style will change since Spring was her first (online) quarter. She was one of the most accommodating professors online-wise: recording & posting all of her lectures, not requiring any mandatory attendance, creating a survey prior to class starting to learn of all of our circumstances and being semi-flexible with exams (at least at the end: the first midterm was a timed 2-3 hour exam and the formatting was stressful, but she became more lenient over time. The final was written 24 hr portion + 45 min (short) timed online portion to curb cheaters, since dumb@sses posted the midterm II on Chegg while it was live). Exams were challenging for sure-arguably in the right ways- but it felt like the practice exams did not always reflect what would be on the exams. Her exam questions were pretty much deviations of "standard" Physics problems: pulleys, rollercoasters, rotation, frames of reference, etc. with a twist.

She was not as accommodating with the rise of BLM protests, while almost most other professors were, so take that as you will.

Office hours: She offers generous office hours. Will answer any questions.

KUDU: The class textbook was a good foundational tool, but not exceptional by any means. It was pretty buggy. I found that the hard-to-follow proofs for derivations in the book were compensated and cleared up by West in the lecture, which I appreciated.

As for teaching, she was one of the best professors I've had. I found her lectures to be a breath of fresh air; compared to the traditional chalkboard lecturer, she made her slides and notes pretty clear and updated. I think if you are taking this class as just a requirement, the work may seem like overkill, but I liked how in-depth she went with the explanations of each proof and providing examples. This is a 5 unit class, compared to most STEM lower divs already being 4 units.

By the latter half of the course, she was unclear about the curve and made things more complicated than they needed to be. I get that she was new and her curve is unique, but this quarter was not one to experiment and test and confuse students.

I do not think she understood the Math requisites for this class, or perhaps Physics 1A disregards it as a course, but she did introduce advanced math topics (like integration/32B-worthy material). It was not too difficult but it is good (not necessary) to try to take 32A before this course since the first half of both courses are introducing vectors.

Overall, I am not sure if I would take this class again. Her accessibility and excellence as a professor were offset by the inconsistency of the course syllabus near the end of the course along with her patronizing commentary towards world events.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: B
June 22, 2020

First off, I believe this was the first class West ever taught as she does research (I think?) and is not yet a true professor, so we were her guinea pig class. Yayyyyy. I went into this class with some experience from taking AP Physics 1 and AP Physics C in high school (A in both classes although I got 2's on both AP tests). I sat in lecture (online Zoom) a few times but ended up skipping most because they were slow and I was uninterested in watching West derive equations. I felt I new the class material well enough because I was able to learn whatever I was missing through the (on average) weekly assigned problems on Kudu. Because we used Kudu, there was no textbook needed for this class. However, while the Kudu homework problems were at a difficulty of my high school physics tests, the two Midterms and Final were almost at a difficulty level of the AP tests. Hence I did not do very well lol. The professor was nice but unwilling to explicitly tell us she'd make the class easier due to the protests and Covid-19, so many students (including me) felt very stressed and disliked her due to her unsympathetic responses to us. I ended up going into the final with what I believed was a C or C- with no curve. Ended up working 15+ hours on the 24 hour final in a desperate attempt to pass the class. When I got my final exam grade back, without a curve I believe it pushed me up to a C+ about .5 percent away from a B-. But lucky for me, West curved this class so I ended with a final grade of a B. Many people in their moment of stress going into the final decided to drop this class or switch to pass/no pass, but I did not because I stubbornly did not care and was ready to take the L. Please don't worry if you have this professor. While Physics 1A is a hard class regardless of professor, and there are definitely professors easier than West, by no means does she make this class impossible. I'd say overall this class was average in difficulty in my experience. (For reference, I'm a mechanical engineering major, had to take the 20 series chem. Now THOSE were hard for me haha).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
PHYSICS 1A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: N/A
June 9, 2020

Most of the class was spent going over formulas and how to derive them. I found this pretty useless because our "textbook" was decent at explaining this. I felt the class would have been better if she dedicated more time to doing relevant examples instead of focusing on the formulas. Our textbook was on Kudu. There were between 15 and 20 questions assigned each week and you have two attempts for the multiple choice and four for the fill-in questions. Some of the questions were quite challenging. The study materials she gave for the midterms and final were nothing like the actual tests. The midterm consisted of between 4 and 7 questions each with multiple parts. They were supposedly able to be completed in around 2 hours, but that was not the case for most of the class. Most students spent more than 5 hours or more on the exams. The exams were pretty challenging, and were almost nothing like the problems we had done in class or for homework. The only thing that I found helpful was the discussion. Most of the time, he would do examples to questions similar to things you would find on the tests. Now for the final. This one of the craziest experiences that I've had in a class. With the protests going on, most professors decided to opt for a no harm final or provide some other form of accommodation for the class. Dr. West's decision was to change the weight of the final by 10% depending on how you performed (final was worth more if you did better than on the midterms). Even after several emails from not only the students, but the Academic Senate as well the department chair, she would not budge on her decision. This was very frustrating, especially after all my other professors had put their students well being as the priority. The only reason she did this was because she felt we hadn't shown her that we knew the material, which doesn't even make any sense. She also began voicing her opinions about the protests, and almost criticized students who wanted to participate in the protests, which I thought was out of line. I know this class is meant to be hard, but the situations that arose could have been handled in a much better manner.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 3
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!