Elizabeth Roth-Johnson
Department of Life Sciences
AD
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 3.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
27.2%
22.7%
18.1%
13.6%
9.1%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.6%
18.0%
14.4%
10.8%
7.2%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (7)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 13, 2020

This class took a significant amount of work, which ranged from really challenging concepts to busy work. That being said, Roth-Johnson did a great job of working within the Life Sciences framework and making sure we really understood the concepts. Her lectures were very well-organized and as engaging as you can get with cell bio, and her office hours were even more so. If you have the choice, I would definitely recommend taking LIFESCI 7A with Roth-Johnson!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: B+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Oct. 12, 2018

Taking LS 7A with Roth-Johnson was enjoyable and informative. Having taken HL Bio before in high school, I expected not to learn much in this class. LS 7A was challenging in a good way however, and helped me to realize so much more about biology. In addition, the TA's and LA's were all extremely helpful and clarified any questions I had. I would definitely take LS again with Roth-Johnson!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 26, 2018

I took LS7A with Roth-Johnson in Fall of 2017. While I have never taken the older series that was replaced by LS 1-4, the assignments in this class seemed a lot like busy work. They were not particularly difficult but took up a lot of time. In general, the 7 series will take more time than really necessary. Roth-Johnson's tests are based of of clicker questions and the practice exams on Launchpad. STUDY THOSE. Attendance is pretty much mandatory. The TAs for LS7A are really great at answering questions during lecture. Utilize them, especially if you know office hours are quite inconvenient for you. Discussion sections are pretty interesting. Most of the time the TA will guide you through answers. 10 points of extra credit were offered when I took it. Utilize them because I wish I had those 10 points during LS7B and LS7C.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: A
June 26, 2018

LS 7A with Roth-Johnson was not a difficult class at all, but as someone who prefers learning more about macro topics, LS 7A is perhaps one of the most boring classes I've taken.

The class is structured such that you learn the material before going to lecture via LauchPad, which although is quite pricey, I found actually quite helpful in learning and "force feeding" the material. Furthermore, 72 points of your total grade comes from iClicker participation, so it's important to go lecture, but you have 2 "free days" which means you can miss up to 2 lectures without any participation point penalty .

The two midterms were straightforward - they were practically a regurgitation of LaunchPad Exam questions and in-class clicker questions. Each midterm has 60 questions, and sometimes the questions are phrased very awkwardly, but by just studying the LaunchPad questions and clicker questions mentioned above, you should be set.

The final, on the other hand, was rather difficult. It is cumulative, but with an emphasis on Weeks 7-10. There are 100 questions, and unlike the midterms, I personally felt the final had a lot more application-based questions (and hence the greater difficulty).

On the plus side, the class is graded on a straight scale, so there's no need to worry about competing with other people. Yuh.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 19, 2018

Honestly no complaints. I didn't try too hard and managed to get an A. My class with her was lucky enough to be BruinCasted and I found that really helpful (especially to dip class occasionally).
I didn't need to take notes.
The tests are the one thing you have to worry about because some of the questions can be obscure, but its 100% multiple choice, so that's nice.
Super nice professor - she remembered me months later even though her class sizes are 300+.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B
June 10, 2018

I am a biology major who got a 5 on the AP test, and yet I had troubles with this course.
First of all, lectures are interesting and are exactly what you would expect. To take this course/series you have to buy an access code+textbook that costs around $100 for a 3 quarter period. This website (Launchpad) teaches you more information that the professor ever does as you have to complete readings/ review quizzes/practice exams. The course is based off a point system. There are a total of 712 points possible:
Midterm 1=90
Midterm 2= 120
Final Exam= 200
Discussion= 80 (Each week there is a 3 point quiz and 5 point worksheet)
Participation= 72 (Clickers- You can miss two days)
Launchpad Activities= 50
Pre-Class Review Questions= 50
Practice Exam Questions= 50

First, let's discuss launchpad:
-Launchpad Activities requires you read/ watch videos/ animations= Guaranteed 100% for this category
-Pre-Class Review Questions are mini-quizzes after the material is presented. You get three tries per quiz. Your score out of these sets of questions is scaled to 5 points a week- Guaranteed 100% for this category.
-Practice Exam Questions are timed tests and are supposed to mimic real exams. You are given 1 chance, and each week your score is scaled to 5 points. YOU WILL LOSE POINTS HERE BECAUSE THE QUESTIONS ARE TRICKY.

Exams:
I struggled with the exams because they were subjective and very strangely worded. They are True/ False and multiple choice but here's the kicker, if you misinterpret what a question is asking you can miss a whole section of 4 to 5 questions easily. The questions are more so applying what you know to situations that would halt or accelerate biological systems. Sometimes knowing so much information about the topics covered in class actually hurt you. The exams do not test what you know and are not a fair representation of how much effort you put into the course. In fact, 5 people from my discussion section said the reason they did so well on exams was because they did not study. Here I am, studying 10+ hours a week to make sure I understand content, and am gettng 70% on my midterms. Tread lightly.

Week 1-Chemistry of Life
Week 2-Cell Organization and Membranes
Week 3-Energy/ Enzymes and Cellular Respiration
Midterm 1
Week 4- Cellular Respiration and Photosynthesis
Week 5- Nucleic Acids and Transcription
Week 6- Proteins and Translation and Protein Sorting
Midterm 2
Week 7-Control of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Week 8- Recombinant DNA and Cell Cycle/DNA Replication
Week 9- PCR, VNTR, and Genome Variation
Week 10- DNA Mutation and Repair, and Cell Cycle/Cell Division

Helpful?

3 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 8, 2018

This review is for LIFESCI 7A. Roth-Johnson doesn't require much commitment for this course. Tests and midterms are easy as long as you have read the textbook (which you will have to do anyways because that's part of the homework). She gives extra credit, but it does not affect your overall grade much. Have a friend alert you when a clicker question goes up if you have a tendency to zone out, because they count toward your grade (correctness is not counted, only participation). Overall an easy course.

Edit (6/7/2018): LS 7A is now a course taught by Professor Roth-Johnson. I have edited this review to be on the correct course (was formerly on LS 2).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 13, 2020

This class took a significant amount of work, which ranged from really challenging concepts to busy work. That being said, Roth-Johnson did a great job of working within the Life Sciences framework and making sure we really understood the concepts. Her lectures were very well-organized and as engaging as you can get with cell bio, and her office hours were even more so. If you have the choice, I would definitely recommend taking LIFESCI 7A with Roth-Johnson!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: B+
Oct. 12, 2018

Taking LS 7A with Roth-Johnson was enjoyable and informative. Having taken HL Bio before in high school, I expected not to learn much in this class. LS 7A was challenging in a good way however, and helped me to realize so much more about biology. In addition, the TA's and LA's were all extremely helpful and clarified any questions I had. I would definitely take LS again with Roth-Johnson!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 26, 2018

I took LS7A with Roth-Johnson in Fall of 2017. While I have never taken the older series that was replaced by LS 1-4, the assignments in this class seemed a lot like busy work. They were not particularly difficult but took up a lot of time. In general, the 7 series will take more time than really necessary. Roth-Johnson's tests are based of of clicker questions and the practice exams on Launchpad. STUDY THOSE. Attendance is pretty much mandatory. The TAs for LS7A are really great at answering questions during lecture. Utilize them, especially if you know office hours are quite inconvenient for you. Discussion sections are pretty interesting. Most of the time the TA will guide you through answers. 10 points of extra credit were offered when I took it. Utilize them because I wish I had those 10 points during LS7B and LS7C.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: A
June 26, 2018

LS 7A with Roth-Johnson was not a difficult class at all, but as someone who prefers learning more about macro topics, LS 7A is perhaps one of the most boring classes I've taken.

The class is structured such that you learn the material before going to lecture via LauchPad, which although is quite pricey, I found actually quite helpful in learning and "force feeding" the material. Furthermore, 72 points of your total grade comes from iClicker participation, so it's important to go lecture, but you have 2 "free days" which means you can miss up to 2 lectures without any participation point penalty .

The two midterms were straightforward - they were practically a regurgitation of LaunchPad Exam questions and in-class clicker questions. Each midterm has 60 questions, and sometimes the questions are phrased very awkwardly, but by just studying the LaunchPad questions and clicker questions mentioned above, you should be set.

The final, on the other hand, was rather difficult. It is cumulative, but with an emphasis on Weeks 7-10. There are 100 questions, and unlike the midterms, I personally felt the final had a lot more application-based questions (and hence the greater difficulty).

On the plus side, the class is graded on a straight scale, so there's no need to worry about competing with other people. Yuh.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
June 19, 2018

Honestly no complaints. I didn't try too hard and managed to get an A. My class with her was lucky enough to be BruinCasted and I found that really helpful (especially to dip class occasionally).
I didn't need to take notes.
The tests are the one thing you have to worry about because some of the questions can be obscure, but its 100% multiple choice, so that's nice.
Super nice professor - she remembered me months later even though her class sizes are 300+.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: B
June 10, 2018

I am a biology major who got a 5 on the AP test, and yet I had troubles with this course.
First of all, lectures are interesting and are exactly what you would expect. To take this course/series you have to buy an access code+textbook that costs around $100 for a 3 quarter period. This website (Launchpad) teaches you more information that the professor ever does as you have to complete readings/ review quizzes/practice exams. The course is based off a point system. There are a total of 712 points possible:
Midterm 1=90
Midterm 2= 120
Final Exam= 200
Discussion= 80 (Each week there is a 3 point quiz and 5 point worksheet)
Participation= 72 (Clickers- You can miss two days)
Launchpad Activities= 50
Pre-Class Review Questions= 50
Practice Exam Questions= 50

First, let's discuss launchpad:
-Launchpad Activities requires you read/ watch videos/ animations= Guaranteed 100% for this category
-Pre-Class Review Questions are mini-quizzes after the material is presented. You get three tries per quiz. Your score out of these sets of questions is scaled to 5 points a week- Guaranteed 100% for this category.
-Practice Exam Questions are timed tests and are supposed to mimic real exams. You are given 1 chance, and each week your score is scaled to 5 points. YOU WILL LOSE POINTS HERE BECAUSE THE QUESTIONS ARE TRICKY.

Exams:
I struggled with the exams because they were subjective and very strangely worded. They are True/ False and multiple choice but here's the kicker, if you misinterpret what a question is asking you can miss a whole section of 4 to 5 questions easily. The questions are more so applying what you know to situations that would halt or accelerate biological systems. Sometimes knowing so much information about the topics covered in class actually hurt you. The exams do not test what you know and are not a fair representation of how much effort you put into the course. In fact, 5 people from my discussion section said the reason they did so well on exams was because they did not study. Here I am, studying 10+ hours a week to make sure I understand content, and am gettng 70% on my midterms. Tread lightly.

Week 1-Chemistry of Life
Week 2-Cell Organization and Membranes
Week 3-Energy/ Enzymes and Cellular Respiration
Midterm 1
Week 4- Cellular Respiration and Photosynthesis
Week 5- Nucleic Acids and Transcription
Week 6- Proteins and Translation and Protein Sorting
Midterm 2
Week 7-Control of Gene Expression in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
Week 8- Recombinant DNA and Cell Cycle/DNA Replication
Week 9- PCR, VNTR, and Genome Variation
Week 10- DNA Mutation and Repair, and Cell Cycle/Cell Division

Helpful?

3 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2017
Grade: A
Jan. 8, 2018

This review is for LIFESCI 7A. Roth-Johnson doesn't require much commitment for this course. Tests and midterms are easy as long as you have read the textbook (which you will have to do anyways because that's part of the homework). She gives extra credit, but it does not affect your overall grade much. Have a friend alert you when a clicker question goes up if you have a tendency to zone out, because they count toward your grade (correctness is not counted, only participation). Overall an easy course.

Edit (6/7/2018): LS 7A is now a course taught by Professor Roth-Johnson. I have edited this review to be on the correct course (was formerly on LS 2).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 3.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.9 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (10)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (8)
  • Needs Textbook
    (9)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (8)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (7)
  • Would Take Again
    (7)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!