Emily Klenin
Department of Slavic
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 21, 2011

Good Professor (HNRS 166 was not listed)

RE: HNRS 166, not H189 (final course grade: A)

The name of this class should definitely be changed and dubbed as “Russian Literature” because that’s essentially what the books, essays and class topics revolved around. At the outset of the quarter, we received A LOT of tedious work as with had to outline so many parts of novels and each character, etcetera but towards the end of the class, she slowed down the heavy workload a little. But either way, every week we had an essay to submit along with reading hundreds of pages. I enjoyed the class, but my only STRONG recommendation is please allow the students to engage in discussions; Professor Klenin is very nice but she generally hijacks every discourse so we rarely spoke up after about the third week.

Overall, an interesting class if you want to dive in the world of Russian literature taught by an expert in the field.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 21, 2011

Good Professor (HNRS 166 was not listed)

RE: HNRS 166, not H189 (final course grade: A)

The name of this class should definitely be changed and dubbed as “Russian Literature” because that’s essentially what the books, essays and class topics revolved around. At the outset of the quarter, we received A LOT of tedious work as with had to outline so many parts of novels and each character, etcetera but towards the end of the class, she slowed down the heavy workload a little. But either way, every week we had an essay to submit along with reading hundreds of pages. I enjoyed the class, but my only STRONG recommendation is please allow the students to engage in discussions; Professor Klenin is very nice but she generally hijacks every discourse so we rarely spoke up after about the third week.

Overall, an interesting class if you want to dive in the world of Russian literature taught by an expert in the field.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 5 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.5 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!