Eran Zaidel
Department of Psychology
AD
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
April 1, 2013

This class sounded so interested on paper. However, Dr. Zaidel repeats A LOT and has an incredibly boring lecturing style. I didn't feel that I learned much because he would spend the two hour lecture going over one concept (and very poorly). He would ramble on to another unrelated topic that was not even based on science. He spent three lectures talking about one of his experiments that was not published in ANY journal just because he liked it. I quote, "I don't need science to prove my ideas are right, I know they are right." Very arrogant. I ended up doing okay in the class but I felt that I wasted my money and time. I LOVE psychology and film and dreaded every moment of this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 12, 2012

Psych 119G
He is a terrible teacher. His lectures are confusing, he rambles on about unrelated subjects so it's difficult to discern what the important topics are, and he doesn't follow his slides. His lectures are extremely unorganized. He also does not relate the readings to his lectures like he is supposed to, so he never goes over what he wants you to know. I would not recommend this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
April 1, 2013

This class sounded so interested on paper. However, Dr. Zaidel repeats A LOT and has an incredibly boring lecturing style. I didn't feel that I learned much because he would spend the two hour lecture going over one concept (and very poorly). He would ramble on to another unrelated topic that was not even based on science. He spent three lectures talking about one of his experiments that was not published in ANY journal just because he liked it. I quote, "I don't need science to prove my ideas are right, I know they are right." Very arrogant. I ended up doing okay in the class but I felt that I wasted my money and time. I LOVE psychology and film and dreaded every moment of this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 12, 2012

Psych 119G
He is a terrible teacher. His lectures are confusing, he rambles on about unrelated subjects so it's difficult to discern what the important topics are, and he doesn't follow his slides. His lectures are extremely unorganized. He also does not relate the readings to his lectures like he is supposed to, so he never goes over what he wants you to know. I would not recommend this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!