F. Zapata Hoyos
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 User s
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.5 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

25.0%
20.8%
16.7%
12.5%
8.3%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: A+
June 19, 2018

Definitely take this class if you are interested in plants! If not, it is still a great class to take that will advance your understanding in phylogeny and evolution.
I personally feel the class came in three phases. The first phase focused on understanding the concept; the second phase involved some memorization; the third phase was back to understanding again and offered insights from current studies. This is a relatively new class, so the structure might change in the future, but in terms of contents it's a good mix.
The lecture was interesting and the professor gave out food for several times to reinforce concepts. Though the syllabus said the tests were straight-scale, but professor curved the midterms and had bonus point questions. I can't ganrantee this would surely happen in the future, but both the professor and the lab TA not only are approachable and patient, but also care for our learning and want us to succeed in this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2018
Grade: A+
June 19, 2018

Definitely take this class if you are interested in plants! If not, it is still a great class to take that will advance your understanding in phylogeny and evolution.
I personally feel the class came in three phases. The first phase focused on understanding the concept; the second phase involved some memorization; the third phase was back to understanding again and offered insights from current studies. This is a relatively new class, so the structure might change in the future, but in terms of contents it's a good mix.
The lecture was interesting and the professor gave out food for several times to reinforce concepts. Though the syllabus said the tests were straight-scale, but professor curved the midterms and had bonus point questions. I can't ganrantee this would surely happen in the future, but both the professor and the lab TA not only are approachable and patient, but also care for our learning and want us to succeed in this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 User s
Easiness 4.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 5.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.5 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!