Gerard C. L. Wong
Department of Bioengineering
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
48.1%
40.1%
32.1%
24.1%
16.0%
8.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

61.9%
51.6%
41.3%
31.0%
20.6%
10.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

43.5%
36.2%
29.0%
21.7%
14.5%
7.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.5%
29.6%
23.7%
17.7%
11.8%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.0%
29.2%
23.3%
17.5%
11.7%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A-
June 29, 2017

Overall, Wong tries hard to teach a fair class without excessive work. He seems like a nice guy and does not want to pressure students with too many burdens. Discussions are not mandatory, and there were only a few that were held (~2-3) to deal with homework problems. Also, Wong primary uses the chalkboard to write notes, so bring your own notebook. He uses slides as a supplement and there are some things on there that he tests you on, but they are on basic things (e.g., from LS classes with DNA) that you should already know. There is a lot of math in BE 139A, but he does not test you on deriving equations. He draws boxes around important formulas. For the final, I went through all his notes and memorized the boxed formulas. One issue is that Wong's notes are not too organized, and I just didn't feel like the class topics synchronous, but maybe that's because I am not a person who is invested in materials science and math-heavy things. I do respect Wong's work, just for the record. He is well-versed in his area and gave several insightful anecdotes in class. He is the epitome of a professor who leans more on the fair side. This class is manageable, and I recommend taking an elective with Dr. Wong, as he tries to make the experience interesting and not too stressful.

Grading scheme is as follows:

30% Homework: Based on class notes. There were a couple of discussions where the TA pretty much just went over the answers BEFORE the HW was due, so go to these! It is difficult to do the HW without going to discussion imo.

30% Group Project: Wong gives a couple of lists of papers and a group of about 3-4 students (you pick your group) presents a summary and critique of this paper using PPT with a template that Wong posts. Try to choose a paper that you feel comfortable with. It was daunting at first for me, but as I read the paper and worked with my group members, it did not turn out so bad after all, but this is just a single experience. Be prepared for questions both from classmates and from Dr. Wong.

30% Exam: Wong calls it a "midterm" even though it is given on the final day of class. Like I mentioned earlier, go over all of your notes and memorize whatever he boxes in class. I am not sure about his other classes, but again, with 139A, I feel like Wong could organize his notes somewhat since I was not sure what was exactly important and what was necessary to know in many cases as I was studying. The first few questions are short answer, followed by an exploratory longer answer, and finally you have several computational problems (this is especially where the boxed formula memorizing comes in handy)

10% Participation: Ask questions in class to the point that Wong knows your name, and I think you should be fine.

Overall, this class was on the less stressful side, but PLEASE never take this for granted. Always take your work seriously, and you will go far.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: A-
June 29, 2017

Overall, Wong tries hard to teach a fair class without excessive work. He seems like a nice guy and does not want to pressure students with too many burdens. Discussions are not mandatory, and there were only a few that were held (~2-3) to deal with homework problems. Also, Wong primary uses the chalkboard to write notes, so bring your own notebook. He uses slides as a supplement and there are some things on there that he tests you on, but they are on basic things (e.g., from LS classes with DNA) that you should already know. There is a lot of math in BE 139A, but he does not test you on deriving equations. He draws boxes around important formulas. For the final, I went through all his notes and memorized the boxed formulas. One issue is that Wong's notes are not too organized, and I just didn't feel like the class topics synchronous, but maybe that's because I am not a person who is invested in materials science and math-heavy things. I do respect Wong's work, just for the record. He is well-versed in his area and gave several insightful anecdotes in class. He is the epitome of a professor who leans more on the fair side. This class is manageable, and I recommend taking an elective with Dr. Wong, as he tries to make the experience interesting and not too stressful.

Grading scheme is as follows:

30% Homework: Based on class notes. There were a couple of discussions where the TA pretty much just went over the answers BEFORE the HW was due, so go to these! It is difficult to do the HW without going to discussion imo.

30% Group Project: Wong gives a couple of lists of papers and a group of about 3-4 students (you pick your group) presents a summary and critique of this paper using PPT with a template that Wong posts. Try to choose a paper that you feel comfortable with. It was daunting at first for me, but as I read the paper and worked with my group members, it did not turn out so bad after all, but this is just a single experience. Be prepared for questions both from classmates and from Dr. Wong.

30% Exam: Wong calls it a "midterm" even though it is given on the final day of class. Like I mentioned earlier, go over all of your notes and memorize whatever he boxes in class. I am not sure about his other classes, but again, with 139A, I feel like Wong could organize his notes somewhat since I was not sure what was exactly important and what was necessary to know in many cases as I was studying. The first few questions are short answer, followed by an exploratory longer answer, and finally you have several computational problems (this is especially where the boxed formula memorizing comes in handy)

10% Participation: Ask questions in class to the point that Wong knows your name, and I think you should be fine.

Overall, this class was on the less stressful side, but PLEASE never take this for granted. Always take your work seriously, and you will go far.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.7 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!