Giancarlo Fernando Cornejo Salinas
Department of Women's Studies
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 30, 2023

This class was listed as Queer-of-Color and Transgender-of-Color Theories and Imaginaries. This class had really long but interesting readings. The discussions we had in class were not the best, maybe due to the fact that not many people did the readings or Professor Cornejo is not that good at facilitating discussion. He has a lot of potential, though, and I see he is very passionate and knowledgeable about the subject. The class had minimal work with a 4-page keyword essay, a group presentation on the readings, and an extension of the keyword essay from 4 to 6 pages due finals week. I think if we had smaller group discussions on the readings and then discussed the readings as a class, the class would feel more engaging. Overall not a bad class, considering this was Professor Cornejo's first time teaching an undergraduate class at UCLA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Dec. 30, 2023

This class was listed as Queer-of-Color and Transgender-of-Color Theories and Imaginaries. This class had really long but interesting readings. The discussions we had in class were not the best, maybe due to the fact that not many people did the readings or Professor Cornejo is not that good at facilitating discussion. He has a lot of potential, though, and I see he is very passionate and knowledgeable about the subject. The class had minimal work with a 4-page keyword essay, a group presentation on the readings, and an extension of the keyword essay from 4 to 6 pages due finals week. I think if we had smaller group discussions on the readings and then discussed the readings as a class, the class would feel more engaging. Overall not a bad class, considering this was Professor Cornejo's first time teaching an undergraduate class at UCLA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!