Graciela B Gelmini
Department of Physics
AD
3.2
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Issues PTEs

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

32.0%
26.7%
21.3%
16.0%
10.7%
5.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A-
March 13, 2016

Professor Gelmini is clearly a brilliant theorist, however her teaching is not reflective of her intellect. Her lectures were long and sometimes unstimulating. She spends most of the doing math that we did not need to use for the homework or exams. Most classes were spent doing a couple different integrals or proofs that were never actually used. Literally none of her demonstrations worked. She went over very little of the physics in a conceptual sense, leaving the students little knowledge of what was going on outside of the mathematics. The tests and homework were extremely challenging and time consuming. Overall, a challenging course with a slightly out of touch professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 28, 2008

Professor Gelmini is very enthusiastic about making sure her students walk away from the class having learned something. Her tests are extremely difficult, especially in comparison to the rather straightforward homework she assigns, and I failed my first midterm, but she was more than willing to offer redemption, and to factor the weight of that midterm into my final grade, once I went and spoke with her at her office hours. She is very approachable, and is a very good *teacher* one-on-one during her office hours (I emphasize teacher because she does not merely give out answers, but expects you to work for them), although I would not recommend conversing with her via email, as she got backlogged very early into the quarter, and tended to need several reminders to get her to respond as the quarter progressed. If she teaches 1A again with the honors section, I highly recommend that any student, whether or not they are in the Honors Program, take the class, as it was a very enjoyable, and rather easy supplement to the course. Difficult tests notwithstanding, she is a very likable and great professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2015
Grade: A-
March 13, 2016

Professor Gelmini is clearly a brilliant theorist, however her teaching is not reflective of her intellect. Her lectures were long and sometimes unstimulating. She spends most of the doing math that we did not need to use for the homework or exams. Most classes were spent doing a couple different integrals or proofs that were never actually used. Literally none of her demonstrations worked. She went over very little of the physics in a conceptual sense, leaving the students little knowledge of what was going on outside of the mathematics. The tests and homework were extremely challenging and time consuming. Overall, a challenging course with a slightly out of touch professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 28, 2008

Professor Gelmini is very enthusiastic about making sure her students walk away from the class having learned something. Her tests are extremely difficult, especially in comparison to the rather straightforward homework she assigns, and I failed my first midterm, but she was more than willing to offer redemption, and to factor the weight of that midterm into my final grade, once I went and spoke with her at her office hours. She is very approachable, and is a very good *teacher* one-on-one during her office hours (I emphasize teacher because she does not merely give out answers, but expects you to work for them), although I would not recommend conversing with her via email, as she got backlogged very early into the quarter, and tended to need several reminders to get her to respond as the quarter progressed. If she teaches 1A again with the honors section, I highly recommend that any student, whether or not they are in the Honors Program, take the class, as it was a very enjoyable, and rather easy supplement to the course. Difficult tests notwithstanding, she is a very likable and great professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.2
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.4 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
  • Issues PTEs
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!