Guido Montufar Cuartas
Department of Statistics
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
18.2%
15.2%
12.1%
9.1%
6.1%
3.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.9%
27.4%
21.9%
16.4%
11.0%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 10, 2025

This is supposed to be a foundational stats course that the other upper divs build upon, and yet he has failed to convey meaningful theory to most students. The slides are copy pasted text out of the textbook and are hard to parse. Going to lecture is not valuable as he does not explain much properly. The way he sometimes responded to honest questions from students on canvas was condescending. The final lecture was review for the final, in which we failed to get through 1 question out of 7 and no one was happy. I found him to be quite friendly in office hours, but the overwhelming impression is that he is a researcher who didn't want to teach in the first place. Whether that's true, it's the vibe we got! The tests are of reasonable difficulty, but the grading scheme is very harsh. This may just be the TA, but there was little/no partial credit, so minor mistakes are costly. The TA and professor both admitted to not having communicated about grading, or really anything at all. This class is apparently not difficult or confusing when taught by other professors, so do yourself and your stats understanding a favor and avoid.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 9, 2025

This class seemed pretty standard for the most part. I feel like the professor could have been a little more engaging, but you can't really have everything you ask for I guess. I do think the participation assignment was one of the most ridiculous things I've had to do at this school—I don't understand how having a baseline of nine questions asked on a discussion post is in any way helpful. I feel like the hardest part of this class was to honestly come up with nine unique questions (like clarifying questions about material) to ask, as I felt pretty secure about most of the content. I understand having a discussion board requirement, but I feel like it should have a purpose, and this assignment just ended in the discussion board being flooded with questions like "Where is the final?" or "What day is the midterm?" just to get points, and many questions I could be interested in were buried under these.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A-
June 10, 2025

This is supposed to be a foundational stats course that the other upper divs build upon, and yet he has failed to convey meaningful theory to most students. The slides are copy pasted text out of the textbook and are hard to parse. Going to lecture is not valuable as he does not explain much properly. The way he sometimes responded to honest questions from students on canvas was condescending. The final lecture was review for the final, in which we failed to get through 1 question out of 7 and no one was happy. I found him to be quite friendly in office hours, but the overwhelming impression is that he is a researcher who didn't want to teach in the first place. Whether that's true, it's the vibe we got! The tests are of reasonable difficulty, but the grading scheme is very harsh. This may just be the TA, but there was little/no partial credit, so minor mistakes are costly. The TA and professor both admitted to not having communicated about grading, or really anything at all. This class is apparently not difficult or confusing when taught by other professors, so do yourself and your stats understanding a favor and avoid.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2025
Grade: A
June 9, 2025

This class seemed pretty standard for the most part. I feel like the professor could have been a little more engaging, but you can't really have everything you ask for I guess. I do think the participation assignment was one of the most ridiculous things I've had to do at this school—I don't understand how having a baseline of nine questions asked on a discussion post is in any way helpful. I feel like the hardest part of this class was to honestly come up with nine unique questions (like clarifying questions about material) to ask, as I felt pretty secure about most of the content. I understand having a discussion board requirement, but I feel like it should have a purpose, and this assignment just ended in the discussion board being flooded with questions like "Where is the final?" or "What day is the midterm?" just to get points, and many questions I could be interested in were buried under these.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!