- Home
- Search
- H Samy Alim
- ANTHRO 4
AD
Based on 72 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Would Take Again
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Professor Alim is truly a nice guy. He always came to class super happy, always in a good mood. But honestly, for a GE, the workload was pretty intense. Huge amounts of readings assigned every week. The midterm and final were easy, given that the final had a study guide, but originally our exams were not suppose to be like that. He changed it up because he really enjoyed the class. The effort for the readings were condensed because the TAs were super helpful. If Wesley Wilson is still a TA, definitely recommend taking him. Extra credit was provided, twice if I remember correctly and two essays were assigned. Alim's lectures could improve. His slides are were chunks of text and he doesn't upload. However, lectures can be fun because guests are brought in to present their research and they were always refreshing.
Anthropology 4 was a really interesting class content-wise. Professor Alim is also a very fun-loving professor, however, his slides can be an absolute nightmare to read. He literally copies chunks from the readings and places it onto the slides. Readings were informative and interesting, and the guest lecturers were truly the highlight of this course. His midterm and final were both multiple choice, and relatively easy, however, one must really put in the effort to study the material. This is because, both the midterm and final are very detail oriented based on the reading material. The ethnographic paper was also quite a lot of fun to do.
This class is now called Anthro 4. Alim was a very knowledgeable and compassionate professor. He really cared about engaging and teaching his students. He brought in tons of guest lecturers that were equally interesting. But the class material seemed repetitive to me. It focused raciolinguistics but the majority of the quarter was spent talking about African American vernacular and its effects and left out other racial groups. The tests were not difficult if you study for them and there was opportunity for extra credit. If you try at all you can get an A.
I feel that the below reviews are somewhat unfair. This class is now called Anthro 4.
Professor Alim is very passionate about raciolinguistics, and so, as is his prerogative, he made it the focus of his class. He is very good about making us feel like colleagues, rather than lowly undergraduates, and makes an effort to keep it interesting. He invites leaders in their fields to come speak to us, including Boots Riley, director of Sorry To Bother You, whose panel was extra credit. His midterm was 25 multiple choice questions, which were pretty easy but if you get 3 wrong its already a B. He changes slides super fast, which is kind of annoying, but the TA's were very helpful during discussion to clarify things. There are a LOT of readings, but as an anthro major, i'm used to it. Alim is at the forefront of the raciolinguistic field and I feel lucky to have been in his class.
Hmm, it's really surprising to me that some people write in such strongly negative reviews for Prof. Alim; ie "avoid at all costs". I would recommend ignoring those reviews, as I had a really great experience with the class, and its hard for me to believe that people actually feel that way. This class truly changed my perspective on the world in a really meaningful way, and I still think about things I learned in the class all the time. Alim is a really cool person who cares about student learning and making the class fun. The lectures had lots of variety in media--ie youtube videos, films, etc. This class was not easy, and doing the readings and going to lecture really was necessary, but if you work hard to understand the concepts and examples, you should do fine on the exams. I definitely recommend this professor, and will try to take him again if he teaches another class in the future. My grade: A+.
At first I was not a big fan of this class but as time progressed I started to enjoy it more. It seems overwhelming at first with all of the readings but I realized later that professor alim did not expect students to know every little detail. Nice teacher and nice TA's at least the guys, the girl TAs scared me a bit. Overall good class.
this was a great class! it focused on language inequality, which turned out to be a really interesting subject. a lot of assigned reading but you didnt have to do it all. if you go to lecture and skim the readings, you should be fine. alim is a really nice/cool guy who cares about the students. he's very open to talk to you during office hours, which you should talk advantage of for sure. pretty easy class and a lot of fun.
This guys was an amazing professor. He is very concerned with a students grade. He also has lots of people come during the lecture within linguistic anthropology to get you interested in the field. There is lots of reading and hw to turn in every week. But you get attendance points. He also gives you a paper to write about 6 pages this is just to help bring up your grade since they really dont focus on details as much. The final was also an autobiographical essay. He also gave us an extra 2%. He is really approachable and really helpful but you must go to lecture to do well in the class. If you got to lecture you will get a B and higher at the very least if not you will be lost in the class and the reading. But he its a fun class, so help fun during his celebrations of knowledge.
Very repetitive. Way too much reading. Horribly done lectures in which he reads his slides verbatim. Ends up being a class about African American Vernacular instead of a general linguistic anthro class. Though, it is definitely very easy. Don't have to do the readings and can still get an A no problem. Honestly though, He could have taught us the concepts that it took him a quarter to teach in 2-3 weeks. Bad class that I wouldn't recommend to anyone. He's a cool guy and I like him a lot. I likely got an A in the class too. But seriously, avoid this class if you can.
Prof tries too hard to be cool. Apart from that, there are too many reading assignments that are coupled with the stupidest assignments known to UCLA's campus: 3-2-1s, in which (for every single reading assignment) you must provide 3 important facts, 2 interesting facts, and 1 question. WTF? I thought I was done with this high school BS. If you are interested in taking a class alllllll about racial inequality in America, go for it. Otherwise, this class is boring and repetitive, with a long arduous midterm graded by obnoxious TAs. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. ever.
Professor Alim is truly a nice guy. He always came to class super happy, always in a good mood. But honestly, for a GE, the workload was pretty intense. Huge amounts of readings assigned every week. The midterm and final were easy, given that the final had a study guide, but originally our exams were not suppose to be like that. He changed it up because he really enjoyed the class. The effort for the readings were condensed because the TAs were super helpful. If Wesley Wilson is still a TA, definitely recommend taking him. Extra credit was provided, twice if I remember correctly and two essays were assigned. Alim's lectures could improve. His slides are were chunks of text and he doesn't upload. However, lectures can be fun because guests are brought in to present their research and they were always refreshing.
Anthropology 4 was a really interesting class content-wise. Professor Alim is also a very fun-loving professor, however, his slides can be an absolute nightmare to read. He literally copies chunks from the readings and places it onto the slides. Readings were informative and interesting, and the guest lecturers were truly the highlight of this course. His midterm and final were both multiple choice, and relatively easy, however, one must really put in the effort to study the material. This is because, both the midterm and final are very detail oriented based on the reading material. The ethnographic paper was also quite a lot of fun to do.
This class is now called Anthro 4. Alim was a very knowledgeable and compassionate professor. He really cared about engaging and teaching his students. He brought in tons of guest lecturers that were equally interesting. But the class material seemed repetitive to me. It focused raciolinguistics but the majority of the quarter was spent talking about African American vernacular and its effects and left out other racial groups. The tests were not difficult if you study for them and there was opportunity for extra credit. If you try at all you can get an A.
I feel that the below reviews are somewhat unfair. This class is now called Anthro 4.
Professor Alim is very passionate about raciolinguistics, and so, as is his prerogative, he made it the focus of his class. He is very good about making us feel like colleagues, rather than lowly undergraduates, and makes an effort to keep it interesting. He invites leaders in their fields to come speak to us, including Boots Riley, director of Sorry To Bother You, whose panel was extra credit. His midterm was 25 multiple choice questions, which were pretty easy but if you get 3 wrong its already a B. He changes slides super fast, which is kind of annoying, but the TA's were very helpful during discussion to clarify things. There are a LOT of readings, but as an anthro major, i'm used to it. Alim is at the forefront of the raciolinguistic field and I feel lucky to have been in his class.
Hmm, it's really surprising to me that some people write in such strongly negative reviews for Prof. Alim; ie "avoid at all costs". I would recommend ignoring those reviews, as I had a really great experience with the class, and its hard for me to believe that people actually feel that way. This class truly changed my perspective on the world in a really meaningful way, and I still think about things I learned in the class all the time. Alim is a really cool person who cares about student learning and making the class fun. The lectures had lots of variety in media--ie youtube videos, films, etc. This class was not easy, and doing the readings and going to lecture really was necessary, but if you work hard to understand the concepts and examples, you should do fine on the exams. I definitely recommend this professor, and will try to take him again if he teaches another class in the future. My grade: A+.
At first I was not a big fan of this class but as time progressed I started to enjoy it more. It seems overwhelming at first with all of the readings but I realized later that professor alim did not expect students to know every little detail. Nice teacher and nice TA's at least the guys, the girl TAs scared me a bit. Overall good class.
this was a great class! it focused on language inequality, which turned out to be a really interesting subject. a lot of assigned reading but you didnt have to do it all. if you go to lecture and skim the readings, you should be fine. alim is a really nice/cool guy who cares about the students. he's very open to talk to you during office hours, which you should talk advantage of for sure. pretty easy class and a lot of fun.
This guys was an amazing professor. He is very concerned with a students grade. He also has lots of people come during the lecture within linguistic anthropology to get you interested in the field. There is lots of reading and hw to turn in every week. But you get attendance points. He also gives you a paper to write about 6 pages this is just to help bring up your grade since they really dont focus on details as much. The final was also an autobiographical essay. He also gave us an extra 2%. He is really approachable and really helpful but you must go to lecture to do well in the class. If you got to lecture you will get a B and higher at the very least if not you will be lost in the class and the reading. But he its a fun class, so help fun during his celebrations of knowledge.
Very repetitive. Way too much reading. Horribly done lectures in which he reads his slides verbatim. Ends up being a class about African American Vernacular instead of a general linguistic anthro class. Though, it is definitely very easy. Don't have to do the readings and can still get an A no problem. Honestly though, He could have taught us the concepts that it took him a quarter to teach in 2-3 weeks. Bad class that I wouldn't recommend to anyone. He's a cool guy and I like him a lot. I likely got an A in the class too. But seriously, avoid this class if you can.
Prof tries too hard to be cool. Apart from that, there are too many reading assignments that are coupled with the stupidest assignments known to UCLA's campus: 3-2-1s, in which (for every single reading assignment) you must provide 3 important facts, 2 interesting facts, and 1 question. WTF? I thought I was done with this high school BS. If you are interested in taking a class alllllll about racial inequality in America, go for it. Otherwise, this class is boring and repetitive, with a long arduous midterm graded by obnoxious TAs. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone. ever.
Based on 72 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (35)
- Would Take Again (36)