Henry Sivak
Department of Geography
AD
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 11 User s
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

AD

Reviews (4)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 29, 2009

Since his lectures did not align with the reading, the readings tended to be unclear. But fortunately, he is an approachable guy and so I attended many of his office hours to clarify what was said in class and was able to get an A. His midterm and final are formatted the same way and the questions themselves are not tricky.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 20, 2009

Took Political Geography in Spring 09. Readings were on the heavy side but not impossible, but you did have to read since the lectures were structured around them. Sivak is approachable, nice guy but as a lecturer, he's a bit unclear. I think it's the way he explains things but I typically walked out of the lecture, having a rough concept of what's he's talking about but never entirely sure. Definitely go to lecture, or else you won't be able to study for the tests. He breaks down his lectures, which helps, and roughly connects it back to the reading but I think you really need a firm grasp of urban planning or general geography in order to call this an easy class. The tests are in-class essays, which limits how many he can assign. He's a fair grader, but there's no curve. If you take this class, be ready to go to every lecture, take notes, and do the readings.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 18, 2009

This class was hard! Prof. Sivak is a very awkward guy but a great professor overall. There are a lot of readings in which he expects you to know the key points well. The lectures are well organized and insightful.

I thought I could half-ass this class and get an A but I ended up with a B overall. This isn't a class for slackers.I hated the readings and I hated all the materials he expected us to know. It was like 5 classes in one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 11, 2009

Geog 140: Political Geography

Man I hate politics. I hated doing readings for this class and I hated going to lecture. But I got an A on the midterm and a B on a paper that I turned in two days late with a 10% reduction, meaning I probably got an A on it. It wasn't me--the TA was Rob and he is a really approachable guy who grades easy and Sivak seems to grade easy as well. I didn't do much reading (basically at all, except for the paper), but I did go to about 75% of the lectures and focused my studying on that. His exams were the same for both the midterm and final. Blue book essays, pick two out of 5 or 6 topics, so as long as you are solid on a few key points and authors/readings, you're good for the exams. He set the midterm and final in class, though, so that means you have 50 minutes to write two essays. The paper was 35%, the midterm 25%, and the final 40%. Sivak himself is awkward in lecture, yes--but the 50 minute time limit makes him (and the topic of politics) bearable, and going to lecture is most definitely worth your while.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 29, 2009

Since his lectures did not align with the reading, the readings tended to be unclear. But fortunately, he is an approachable guy and so I attended many of his office hours to clarify what was said in class and was able to get an A. His midterm and final are formatted the same way and the questions themselves are not tricky.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 20, 2009

Took Political Geography in Spring 09. Readings were on the heavy side but not impossible, but you did have to read since the lectures were structured around them. Sivak is approachable, nice guy but as a lecturer, he's a bit unclear. I think it's the way he explains things but I typically walked out of the lecture, having a rough concept of what's he's talking about but never entirely sure. Definitely go to lecture, or else you won't be able to study for the tests. He breaks down his lectures, which helps, and roughly connects it back to the reading but I think you really need a firm grasp of urban planning or general geography in order to call this an easy class. The tests are in-class essays, which limits how many he can assign. He's a fair grader, but there's no curve. If you take this class, be ready to go to every lecture, take notes, and do the readings.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 18, 2009

This class was hard! Prof. Sivak is a very awkward guy but a great professor overall. There are a lot of readings in which he expects you to know the key points well. The lectures are well organized and insightful.

I thought I could half-ass this class and get an A but I ended up with a B overall. This isn't a class for slackers.I hated the readings and I hated all the materials he expected us to know. It was like 5 classes in one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 11, 2009

Geog 140: Political Geography

Man I hate politics. I hated doing readings for this class and I hated going to lecture. But I got an A on the midterm and a B on a paper that I turned in two days late with a 10% reduction, meaning I probably got an A on it. It wasn't me--the TA was Rob and he is a really approachable guy who grades easy and Sivak seems to grade easy as well. I didn't do much reading (basically at all, except for the paper), but I did go to about 75% of the lectures and focused my studying on that. His exams were the same for both the midterm and final. Blue book essays, pick two out of 5 or 6 topics, so as long as you are solid on a few key points and authors/readings, you're good for the exams. He set the midterm and final in class, though, so that means you have 50 minutes to write two essays. The paper was 35%, the midterm 25%, and the final 40%. Sivak himself is awkward in lecture, yes--but the 50 minute time limit makes him (and the topic of politics) bearable, and going to lecture is most definitely worth your while.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.6
Overall Rating
Based on 11 Users
Easiness 2.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.1 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!