Herman Ooms
Department of History
AD
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 8, 2010

I have never done one of these reviews, but felt compelled to do so after taking Pr. Ooms class. Unless you are a fan of Japanese Religions or have real interest in the subject, do not take this class. He lectures are a bit dry and boring. His midterm and finals are a bit ridiculous. I ended up getting a C- on the first midterm when I got a score of B-/C+ on the essay. The essay was worth 80% of the test. In fairness, he gives you an essay every week, but expects you to "know" which terms are important. He does highlight a few, but not all. Overall I would rate the Professor as B- and the Class as B-. Not horrible, but avoid unless truly interested in the subject.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 13, 2008

Have taken both his Tokugawa and Japanese History of Religion classes. He is somewhat quiet and well, professorial in his delivery, but the information is very interesting - and so is he if you take the time to drop by office hours. A very nice guy. . Also, it turns out he's a major scholar with like five important books to his credit, so for history and Asian Studies majors, he's extra interesting.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 8, 2010

I have never done one of these reviews, but felt compelled to do so after taking Pr. Ooms class. Unless you are a fan of Japanese Religions or have real interest in the subject, do not take this class. He lectures are a bit dry and boring. His midterm and finals are a bit ridiculous. I ended up getting a C- on the first midterm when I got a score of B-/C+ on the essay. The essay was worth 80% of the test. In fairness, he gives you an essay every week, but expects you to "know" which terms are important. He does highlight a few, but not all. Overall I would rate the Professor as B- and the Class as B-. Not horrible, but avoid unless truly interested in the subject.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 13, 2008

Have taken both his Tokugawa and Japanese History of Religion classes. He is somewhat quiet and well, professorial in his delivery, but the information is very interesting - and so is he if you take the time to drop by office hours. A very nice guy. . Also, it turns out he's a major scholar with like five important books to his credit, so for history and Asian Studies majors, he's extra interesting.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!