- Home
- Search
- Hui-shu Lee
- ART HIS 29
AD
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
The class consists of all slides with no context. Just the picture, year, and location excavated. The exam for this class requires you to memorize about 100 of the described above (and its only worth 30%). Not worth going to class and lots of reading per week. I'm a chemical engineering major and this is my busiest class.. such useless memorization and a waste of time.
Pretty hard. Should have just done the readings and not gone to class. The lectures were hard to follow and although they were put online, they were not useful to go back and refer to. Most of the material was in the reading, only a little bit was vaguely covered in class.
Couldn't understand the second professor (Lee); she was very quiet, had a strong accent, and did not put together slides that were easy to glean information from.
Made me start smoking again tbh.
I had both Lee and Faulkenhausen for this course. I'm an art history major so I didn't find the material difficult at all, but I that doesn't mean I found it interesting. Fortunately, the professors were kind and were lenient with the ongoing TA strike so grades weren't issue. However, I had difficulty paying much attention at all during lectures because I just couldn't get into it. The lectures felt sporadic and know one knew what information to focus on. I think Chinese art is so interesting (i'm chinese) but the stories could've been weaved together much better and main ideas more clearly stated to help out students more.
The class consists of all slides with no context. Just the picture, year, and location excavated. The exam for this class requires you to memorize about 100 of the described above (and its only worth 30%). Not worth going to class and lots of reading per week. I'm a chemical engineering major and this is my busiest class.. such useless memorization and a waste of time.
Pretty hard. Should have just done the readings and not gone to class. The lectures were hard to follow and although they were put online, they were not useful to go back and refer to. Most of the material was in the reading, only a little bit was vaguely covered in class.
Couldn't understand the second professor (Lee); she was very quiet, had a strong accent, and did not put together slides that were easy to glean information from.
Made me start smoking again tbh.
I had both Lee and Faulkenhausen for this course. I'm an art history major so I didn't find the material difficult at all, but I that doesn't mean I found it interesting. Fortunately, the professors were kind and were lenient with the ongoing TA strike so grades weren't issue. However, I had difficulty paying much attention at all during lectures because I just couldn't get into it. The lectures felt sporadic and know one knew what information to focus on. I think Chinese art is so interesting (i'm chinese) but the stories could've been weaved together much better and main ideas more clearly stated to help out students more.
Based on 6 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.