Dynamics of Particles and Bodies

Iman Mehdipour

Dynamics of Particles and Bodies

Civil and Environmental Engineering department

Iman Mehdipour

Add Review
from 1 user

Ratings

Bad
Overall 1.0
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 2.0
Easy
Heavy
Workload 3.0
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 3.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 2.0
Helpful
AD

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Issues PTEs

Grades

Winter 2019
20.8%
17.4%
13.9%
10.4%
6.9%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD
AD
1 of 1

Reviews

Quarter Taken: Winter 2019 Submitted May 1, 2019 Grade Received: C+

Does not curve class or tests or homework. This would be okay if he designed tests to match this with a distribution around an 80 , but he does not. the tests all had an average of around a 70-72. Okay so he doesn't curve any thing so the average in the class is now a C-. His solution to this is to prove "bonus points" which are 1 point a class rewarded to usually one person who raises their hand to answer his questions the fastest. Max bonus points you can get before a test is 5 so the average is now a C+. not much better. I scored above average on every test (both midterms and the final) and still received a C+ for my final grade. Ad before you think well it must have been the hw or attendance, I got all of those points too. Its the tests.

His grading scheme doesn't make sense for the type of tests he likes to give which are tricky, non trivial questions for a really straightforward class like statics or dynamics, both of which he has taught. He refuses to fix this problem because his logic is that "we need to be challenged." Little does he know, apparently, but we take 3 other engineering classes a quarter that aren't 2 units and are actually applicable to our majors (excluding statics). So we are already challenged enough thank you very much. Don't need to stress over some high school physics course that we've learned 3 or 4 times already.

His lectures are dry, the only reason one would need to attend is to get attendance credit and maybe a bonus point if you can pay attention to his slides (which often contain mistakes and unfinished examples) for long enough.He never works examples on the board so his slides skip crucial steps in his examples. and he just reads through the steps. He clearly didn't make the slides himself, he just uses some generic department slides. He attributes our previous knowledge of this course to how well he teaches, which led to him telling us not to evaluate him at the end of the quarter because he "doesn't think it would be useful" to him.

He's a nice guy, but a stubborn and pretty below average professor. Could be a lot better for the ease of the class he is teaching. Good luck dealing with his annoying idiosyncrasies.

1 of 1

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Gives Extra Credit
  • Issues PTEs
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!