Ingrid Norrmann-Vigil
Department of Linguistics
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Needs Textbook
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Participation Matters

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

58.8%
49.0%
39.2%
29.4%
19.6%
9.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: NR
March 14, 2019

This lady has her head up her ass.

Helpful?

1 3 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: P
March 9, 2019

I took her for EngComp6W and it is a HORRIBLE class. Do not take it. Her grading scheme is ridiculous as the entire class is based on a linguistic analysis research paper that requires you to know everything about the field of linguistics in Week 2, or she’ll completely destroy your grade by Week 7. She grades rough drafts incredibly hard (30% of your final grade) and harshly criticizes students’ papers and ideas when little to no advice or lessons were taught on the features we were supposed to analyze. She is a rude and unapproachable professor who wants her class to be a 20+ hour commitment in your life despite everyone taking it as a desperate Writing 2 requirement. She is rude to students in office hours and in class, and provides nothing but criticism and scrutiny when you ask for help. I’ve never felt the need to write a review about a professor before, but considering she doesn’t allow for teacher evaluations, I felt like people needed to know how awful this class was before they try to enroll in it.

Helpful?

1 3 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Summer 2018
Grade: A
Jan. 26, 2019

Workload is so FUCKING intense. Like unreal at times. However, material is very interesting and can be pretty thought provoking. Take class at your own risk!

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Summer 2016
Grade: NR
March 14, 2019

This lady has her head up her ass.

Helpful?

1 3 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: P
March 9, 2019

I took her for EngComp6W and it is a HORRIBLE class. Do not take it. Her grading scheme is ridiculous as the entire class is based on a linguistic analysis research paper that requires you to know everything about the field of linguistics in Week 2, or she’ll completely destroy your grade by Week 7. She grades rough drafts incredibly hard (30% of your final grade) and harshly criticizes students’ papers and ideas when little to no advice or lessons were taught on the features we were supposed to analyze. She is a rude and unapproachable professor who wants her class to be a 20+ hour commitment in your life despite everyone taking it as a desperate Writing 2 requirement. She is rude to students in office hours and in class, and provides nothing but criticism and scrutiny when you ask for help. I’ve never felt the need to write a review about a professor before, but considering she doesn’t allow for teacher evaluations, I felt like people needed to know how awful this class was before they try to enroll in it.

Helpful?

1 3 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Summer 2018
Grade: A
Jan. 26, 2019

Workload is so FUCKING intense. Like unreal at times. However, material is very interesting and can be pretty thought provoking. Take class at your own risk!

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.3 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!