Isabella Beatriz Arzeno Soltero
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
AD
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
March 28, 2024

She is a new professor, so her lecture format isn't really what I was used to (she does a lot of exercises/discussion-type problems in lecture). Her homework problem sets are extremely long and difficult, and oftentimes she would have to make multiple announcements to clarify/correct things on the PSETs. Her exams are also very long and thus difficult (midterm, cumulative final, one-paper cheat sheet allowed), but isn't too bad. She has a kind exam/HW re-do policy to help you make up some lost points. Her final project was very open ended (lacked some clear instruction) so it was both good and bad in some ways. She's really kind and approachable in office hours. I would recommend pairing your study with textbook reading as her lectures are not always the best in covering all the material clearly.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: NR
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
March 11, 2024

Good:
* Cares about her students.
* Willing to hear about their concerns.
* Funny and easy to talk to and reach out when you have questions.
* Would take a future course with her.
* Applied final project. Good for resumes and interviews.

Bad:
* Very difficult content because it is applied fluid mechanics.
* Lectures would be better if posted online and done with an iPad. Her ability to communicate material could be better but that will come with time because she is a new professor.
* Many issues with posted homework.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A
March 28, 2024

She is a new professor, so her lecture format isn't really what I was used to (she does a lot of exercises/discussion-type problems in lecture). Her homework problem sets are extremely long and difficult, and oftentimes she would have to make multiple announcements to clarify/correct things on the PSETs. Her exams are also very long and thus difficult (midterm, cumulative final, one-paper cheat sheet allowed), but isn't too bad. She has a kind exam/HW re-do policy to help you make up some lost points. Her final project was very open ended (lacked some clear instruction) so it was both good and bad in some ways. She's really kind and approachable in office hours. I would recommend pairing your study with textbook reading as her lectures are not always the best in covering all the material clearly.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: NR
March 11, 2024

Good:
* Cares about her students.
* Willing to hear about their concerns.
* Funny and easy to talk to and reach out when you have questions.
* Would take a future course with her.
* Applied final project. Good for resumes and interviews.

Bad:
* Very difficult content because it is applied fluid mechanics.
* Lectures would be better if posted online and done with an iPad. Her ability to communicate material could be better but that will come with time because she is a new professor.
* Many issues with posted homework.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
    (2)
  • Has Group Projects
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!