- Home
- Search
- Jared Wong
- PSYCH 10
AD
Based on 45 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Gives Extra Credit
- Needs Textbook
- Engaging Lectures
- Often Funny
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Snazzy Dresser
- Would Take Again
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
His tests are not as tricky as I'd previously heard. As long as you study his powerpoint slides (and make sure to take additional notes as he mentions a lot of things in class that aren't in his slides), you will do perfectly fine. The only thing a little nerve wrecking is the fact that his midterm and final are worth the same in his class (each 45%), so you really have to make sure you do good on both to get an A.
You are pointlessly risking your gpa by taking this guy. Take Abramson if you planning to take psych 10 during the fall. Abramson gives 50% solid A's while Wong gives 50% A's and B's so it's probably about less than 20% solid A's. If scheduling is a concern, that's even more reason to take Abramson. Abramson's lectures are typically at 5pm, but they are all recorded online. Wong's are not. In terms of teaching, Wong is your standard lecturer. Abramson is does something different. I think Abramson gives a psychology book rather than a textbook like Wong. Take Abramson. Better time, better gpa, and from what I have heard, a better teacher. To put things in perspective, I am most likely going to get an A- in this class. I pretty pissed off because my friend in the other class is getting a solid A without doing much work. Wong doesn't give much work either, but his tests can be tricky. I didn't have high expectations for this class which is why I didn't do as well on the midterm. I just didn't take it seriously enough, but the class really isn't outrageous or anything like that. Take Abramson. It's just a smarter decision.
He is funny and reasonably interesting. I stopped taking notes and just went over the powerpoints later. Don't be fooled by the fact that the tests are multiple choice. You have to know the material pretty well. I did not study at all for the midterm and was very hungover (big mistake!) and got a 66. But with a little studying (and a little less drinking) I got a 96 on the final and managed get a B.
His tests are not as tricky as I'd previously heard. As long as you study his powerpoint slides (and make sure to take additional notes as he mentions a lot of things in class that aren't in his slides), you will do perfectly fine. The only thing a little nerve wrecking is the fact that his midterm and final are worth the same in his class (each 45%), so you really have to make sure you do good on both to get an A.
You are pointlessly risking your gpa by taking this guy. Take Abramson if you planning to take psych 10 during the fall. Abramson gives 50% solid A's while Wong gives 50% A's and B's so it's probably about less than 20% solid A's. If scheduling is a concern, that's even more reason to take Abramson. Abramson's lectures are typically at 5pm, but they are all recorded online. Wong's are not. In terms of teaching, Wong is your standard lecturer. Abramson is does something different. I think Abramson gives a psychology book rather than a textbook like Wong. Take Abramson. Better time, better gpa, and from what I have heard, a better teacher. To put things in perspective, I am most likely going to get an A- in this class. I pretty pissed off because my friend in the other class is getting a solid A without doing much work. Wong doesn't give much work either, but his tests can be tricky. I didn't have high expectations for this class which is why I didn't do as well on the midterm. I just didn't take it seriously enough, but the class really isn't outrageous or anything like that. Take Abramson. It's just a smarter decision.
He is funny and reasonably interesting. I stopped taking notes and just went over the powerpoints later. Don't be fooled by the fact that the tests are multiple choice. You have to know the material pretty well. I did not study at all for the midterm and was very hungover (big mistake!) and got a 66. But with a little studying (and a little less drinking) I got a 96 on the final and managed get a B.
Based on 45 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (13)
- Gives Extra Credit (13)
- Needs Textbook (8)
- Engaging Lectures (9)
- Often Funny (9)
- Tolerates Tardiness (7)
- Snazzy Dresser (7)
- Would Take Again (8)