Professor

Jeffrey Guhin

AD
3.7
Overall Ratings
Based on 24 Users
Easiness 3.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.6 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (24)

3 of 3
3 of 3
Add your review...
June 21, 2025
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A

The professor clearly has a good sense of humor and brought an energetic presence to the classroom. At times, the lectures were engaging, and it was evident that he’s passionate about the subject matter. His personality made the class feel approachable at first, and there were moments where his humor helped lighten the mood. However, despite those positives, the course structure left a lot to be desired. Instructions for assignments and quizzes were often unclear, and the grading system was difficult to follow. I spent hours each week trying to keep up and do my best, but I often felt unsure of what was expected. Grades were not communicated until the end of the quarter, which made it hard to track progress or know where I stood. When I reached out with questions, I was hoping for guidance — instead, I received a response that felt dismissive and sarcastic, which really undermined the time and effort I had put into the course. It was disappointing, especially after working so hard. I think this class could be a great experience with more organization, clearer expectations, and more supportive communication. The professor has the potential to be an excellent educator, but it might help to step back, regroup, and find a healthier balance — both for himself and for his students.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
SOCIOL 102
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A
June 21, 2025

The professor clearly has a good sense of humor and brought an energetic presence to the classroom. At times, the lectures were engaging, and it was evident that he’s passionate about the subject matter. His personality made the class feel approachable at first, and there were moments where his humor helped lighten the mood. However, despite those positives, the course structure left a lot to be desired. Instructions for assignments and quizzes were often unclear, and the grading system was difficult to follow. I spent hours each week trying to keep up and do my best, but I often felt unsure of what was expected. Grades were not communicated until the end of the quarter, which made it hard to track progress or know where I stood. When I reached out with questions, I was hoping for guidance — instead, I received a response that felt dismissive and sarcastic, which really undermined the time and effort I had put into the course. It was disappointing, especially after working so hard. I think this class could be a great experience with more organization, clearer expectations, and more supportive communication. The professor has the potential to be an excellent educator, but it might help to step back, regroup, and find a healthier balance — both for himself and for his students.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 3
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!